Yeah. Now extrapolate out to a global population size. 0.075% is 1 in 1,157. In other words, not far off from Denis Rancourt's estimates. Millions of people dead.
China Wuhan Virus Pandemic
- Thread starter Arch Dornan
- Start date
Vyor
My influence grows!
Yes. And Pfizer unblinded their trials and gave the vaccine to the control group. Or were you not paying attention to what Brook Jackson said?
This is serious stuff, @Vyor. People have been presenting the data and they've been ignored by the mainstream media.
Last edited:
Vyor
My influence grows!
And there were a total of 38, across both groups, after 33 weeks. They started unblinding the trial at 20 weeks, or about 4.5 months. So there were 1.5 months between the unblinding and those numbers.
That is not statistically significant.
To people who lost love one's to that mortality rate, it is VERY SIGNIFICANT.
The clot shots we a depopulation event, coupled with ineffective treatment of the virus itself, and at best the J&J shot is a placebo that won't fuck over the person that gets it, but won't even protect from the Wu Flu itself.
Natural immunity is the only lasting immunity to the Wu Flu, and people who got the shots likely will never be able to get that same level of immunity, while also have either a mRNA UXO in their systems for the rest of their lives, or a placebo that did nothing but allow people to fill out some paperwork for their jobs/governments.
Vaccines arnt cures, hell flu shots are a guess.
It is supposed to mitigate things at best
I haven't gotten a flu shot since the Wu Flu came out, because they started talking about putting them in the same shot after a bit.
I rarely got the flu shot before that, to be fair, because I understood medical quality control/effectiveness was often exaggerated and doubted the shot did anything for me for a long time.
I won't shit on TDAP or malaria or anthrax shots, those are proven and effective products, but flu shots are crap in terms of effectiveness, 60% at best, and 60% would get you a low D on any grade school or college test, why should I trust it from a medical group?
That's not even touching the Wu Flu vax itself, which is at best a placebo, at worst an effective human genophage, and we don't have the same number of kids the krogan do.
Yeah, I used to get the flu shot yearly for my job, got the flu yearly, too.
Vaccines are one of the best things that medical science has ever produced. The flu vaccine isn't really necessary though. Unless you're in a risk group, then you might as well take it. 60% chance of protection is better than 0% when the flu can kill you and there
are very few negative side effects.
If you're an otherwise healthy adult, you Just don't need it.
And y'all already know my position on the covid "vaccine."
mrttao
Well-known member
J&J shot actually got recalled for killing people too quickly and too obviously via blood clots
Which is odd because a vast majority of the military got it and we have had zero deaths from it. (It was the only one able to be sent overseas, thousands of Service members were given the JnJ)
I got it. Been fine.
Funnily enough though, it was still able to be gotten after the apperent recall
Everyone always mentions the wrong guy lol.
Military stateside got Pfizer
Dangit!!! Fixed
Vyor
My influence grows!
Except it's literally 0 correlation with that level of statistical insignificance. 0, none, nada, zilch.
That number of computer crashes among that number of software users is within expected norms. Like, that number would more likely be because of poor RAM overclocking or cosmic ray events than the software being bad. The same can be said of the medical field, particularly since at least in that article they didn't say who those adverse events even happened to. If it happened primarily to older people, I think I can see a much stronger correlation!
Maybe there was more than one version, and they had some control over who got which one.
Vyor
My influence grows!
The more conspiracy theories you need to justify things, the more likely it isn't true. The more people need to be in on it, the more likely it isn't true.
Not if the extra "theories" are just extrapolations from the main one, and can be tested.
No, the more people who would need to be fully "in on it", without any of them spilling the beans....
Vyor
My influence grows!
And thus not true, because the conspiracy would fall apart. It only takes one person coming out with evidence.
So far: 0 evidence in spite of a multi corporation with multiple government orgs alleged plan to depopulate the fucking planet. Across multiple governments, including china and russia which... if they had info on this, do you think they'd not use it for an easy propaganda win? "The americans were poisoning their own citizens! And knew about it! They wanted us to do so too, here are their own words!"
This is akin to saying that NASA faked the moon landing and the USSR knew but didn't say anything. For some reason.
Yeah the "all of the governments of the world are in on it" part I don't buy either. American Big Pharma wanting to push products to make people sick, and thus need more drugs, otoh?
While I know that there are people out there who believe that the planet is direly overpopulated and needs far less people, it makes more sense to me to assume that American companies are motivated for profit.
Vyor
My influence grows!
Oh 100%, I can absolutely buy that they just rushed the vaccines out without full testing done because they wanted to be the first on the market and, thus, able to charge whatever the fuck they wanted.
But that's... to fuck up so badly that a single vaccine can kill people in 20 different ways? That requires deliberate effort, not "this will probably work well enough to avoid questions" like a profit motive would want.