China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

He actually has a lot of good points. His "eugenic" points actually point towards positive reinforcement eugenics rather than what has been done before with sterilization and forced agendas.

He pretty much debunks the depop thing with the simple fact that sudden depopulation would crash the economy and threten the powerbase of the people pushing it. And that it is more aboit power, control and money than anything to do with killing people off.
 
And is that topic an instant switch-off for you? Why?
Because eugenicists would want people like me dead or sterile for my 'defects'.

Anytime I see people wanting to push 'genetic hygiene's/'genetic health's I know they are pushing to make sure only the 'gentically healthy'/'genrtically fit' are allowed to reproduce or even live.
 
Because eugenicists would want people like me dead or sterile for my 'defects'.

Anytime I see people wanting to push 'genetic hygiene's/'genetic health's I know they are pushing to make sure only the 'gentically healthy'/'genrtically fit' are allowed to reproduce or even live.
I'm not the center of the world and neither are you. They can be good reasons I should not breed, and the same goes for you.

If you are wary of those who would enforce eugenics, I'm with you on that. Plenty of us do in fact want a eugenic society without, for example, state-enforced breeding licenses. A good start in this direction is removing dysgenic state policies. We could get a whole lot of mileage simply by removing legislation that makes things worse.
 
I'm not the center of the world and neither are you. They can be good reasons I should not breed, and the same goes for you.

If you are wary of those who would enforce eugenics, I'm with you on that. Plenty of us do in fact want a eugenic society without, for example, state-enforced breeding licenses. A good start in this direction is removing dysgenic state policies. We could get a whole lot of mileage simply by removing legislation that makes things worse.

Yeah the post pretty much points to, as I said, positive reinforcement eugenics instead of what has been done. The problem with Eugenics has never really been weather it works or not. It does, centuries of horse and cattle and dog breeding show the theory is perfectly valid. The problem is whenever people try and get human eugenics going they always end up going for, as you said, breeding loicenses and state enforced sterilizations and such.

That is the real problem with Eugenics. Not the theory, but the practice that ends up violating people's freedoms and enabling massive problems. If people want to practice Eugenics that is fine, but the moment you violate people's bodies it stops being ok.
 
Because eugenicists would want people like me dead or sterile for my 'defects'.

Anytime I see people wanting to push 'genetic hygiene's/'genetic health's I know they are pushing to make sure only the 'gentically healthy'/'genrtically fit' are allowed to reproduce or even live.
Depends on the person who's advocating these kinds of things.

Like how you have said you'd like to have children with someone who is black/brown because it could improve your genetics because of conditions you have. That's genetic hygiene.

If everyone viewed mating like that, there would be no forced Eugenics, and we would have a much healthier society.

But I get your concerns too.
 
Depends on the person who's advocating these kinds of things.

Like how you have said you'd like to have children with someone who is black/brown because it could improve your genetics because of conditions you have. That's genetic hygiene.

If everyone viewed mating like that, there would be no forced Eugenics, and we would have a much healthier society.

But I get your concerns too.
There is a difference between personal choices when it comes to who you want kids with, and the forced nature of it that eugenicists push.

The first is not eugenics, the second is, and trying to conflate the two just muddies the waters.
 
There is a difference between personal choices when it comes to who you want kids with, and the forced nature of it that eugenicists push.

The first is not eugenics, the second is, and trying to conflate the two just muddies the waters.
I agree, They are very different, and one is outright evil.

But depending whay this guy meant, genetic hygiene could just mean picking quality, compatible mates.

And without enforcing this, we could start teaching it to people and encourage it.

That doesn't carry the same evil, and would improve the overall human race.
 
I agree, They are very different, and one is outright evil.

But depending whay this guy meant, genetic hygiene could just mean picking quality, compatible mates.

And without enforcing this, we could start teaching it to people and encourage it.

That doesn't carry the same evil, and would improve the overall human race.
I am not interested in 'improving' the human race; too many horrors can be justified under the desire for that.

We do not need to make humanity 'better', just our tech.
 
Just wait for the next strain or one after it.

This vaccine will shortly be even less effective. Completely resistant strain coming soon. We are breeding it with these shitty vaccines that don't really work. Soon they'll be completely ineffective, even with boosters.
Let's hope enough people get fed up with the bullshit, and have balls to declared the Wu Flu endemic and thus all mitigation measures now moot.

This bug is going to be with us forever, and no amount of mitigation measures or vaxs/boosters will change that.

We need to refocus our effort on forcing China to foot the bill for the damage they have caused to the rest of the world.

Edit: Also, anyone involved with funding the Wuhan gain-of-function shit, and hiding all that shit from the public/ignoring the laws against it in the US to get away with funding them in China, needs to be brought up on charges.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top