Aaron Fox
Well-known member
It isn't a lie when the data supports it Sunhawk. Also, the F-111 killed far more tanks than the A-10 in its entire extended lifespan. When the only other aircraft (the Tornado) had greater losses (and, last I've checked, been tasked with the mission of killing Iraqi airfields)...We've already been over this, @Aaron Fox, the A-10 was MORE SURVIVABLE while not being allowed to use their preferred attack profile than the F-16, which flew lower-threat missions and within its preferred attack profile. Constantly repeating a lie does not magically make it the truth.
... stop sounding like a Sparky fanboy by repeating their lies.
It is, but once anything more than a few AAGs shows up (even a few MANPADs), it starts to take losses. Even Iraqi levels of competence are deadly to an A-10. That is why the F-35 is going to replace the A-10, low and slow is a death sentence now.The A-10 when flying at super low attitude and allowed to have unrestricted ground attack, is a beat