Middle East US Airstrike decapitates Iraqi Hezbollah

I think Realm is in the camp who think the Japanese only surrendered because the Russians entered the war against them after the bombs dropped.

Whether the Russians entering the war or the bombs caused Japan to surrender will always be an issue of contention. I've found that those who support it being the Russian entry tend to also be those who have general anti-American or at least America-skeptical attitudes and views.
I doubt the Soviet naval capabilities could make much of a difference. They were also extremely battered by the war with Germany. Claiming their involvement outweighed the friggin' nuclear destruction of two cities is moronic. I doubt the Soviets were even a minor consideration.
 


Because quite frankly this needed to be said to the general public.


While he is correct about the media's coverage of this, he really has zero clue of what he is talking about in reference to the actual situation or the implications. Soleimani was far more than "some terrorist asshole" and Trump was absolutely willing to provoke a war with Iran when he authorized this strike.

Note the timing of the cancelation of Pompeo's trip vis a vi this strike, and the reports that Trump has rejected assassinating Soleimani at least once previously, and that Obama refused to take him out because of the expected consequences of doing so.

While Trump would be perfectly fine with Iran backing down, he absolutely did this on the expectation that it would lead to a war with Iran as a consequence.
 
Time to bring back a McCain classic.


That is exactly the sentiment that I am talking about (although more on SB than here) and that the talking heads are missing.

Note how the crowd clapped for the guy asking the question/making the statement.

There is a very large swath of the US population, especially in the Trump electorate, that ran entirely out of patience with Iran a decade or more ago and will cheer on blowing the hell out of them on pretty much the slightest excuse.

People should also remember the condemnation from much of the right when Trump decided not to retaliate for the drone.
 
That is exactly the sentiment that I am talking about (although more on SB than here) and that the talking heads are missing.

Note how the crowd clapped for the guy asking the question/making the statement.

There is a very large swath of the US population, especially in the Trump electorate, that ran entirely out of patience with Iran a decade or more ago and will cheer on blowing the hell out of them on pretty much the slightest excuse.

People should also remember the condemnation from much of the right when Trump decided not to retaliate for the drone.
Personally, I have sympathy for the people of Iran, but no fucks to give about the Ayatollah and IRGC.

If Iran escalates, Trump can pull Operation Preying Mantis 2.0 without that much of an issue.

Even just flattening their refineries would probably force Iran to back down and neutralize them as a serious regional competitor. All with minimal civie collateral damage.
 
Personally, I have sympathy for the people of Iran, but no fucks to give about the Ayatollah and IRGC.

If Iran escalates, Trump can pull Operation Preying Mantis 2.0 without that much of an issue.

Even just flattening their refineries would probably force Iran to back down and neutralize them as a serious regional competitor. All with minimal civie collateral damage.
Remember when Trump mentioned 52 targets if Iran does something stupid. Take a guess as to how many American hostages Iran took in the 1970s.
 
Interesting indeed. Ask the former USSR countries if they'd rather get back into the Russian sphere of influence.
They won't especially Ukraine and Poland.
Or ask China's neighbors if they want back into their influence. Vietnam, India, South Korea, and the Philippines don't like China.
Even now Tibet and the Uyghurs want out.

To be fair under American influence just like with the Russians there's the possibility of getting replaced if you're one of those random dictators that leads to further instability. Philippines didn't like what happened to them.

So like we thought, they decided to use indirect means, using their pets rather than doing it themselves.
Disposable and deniable assets to carryout attacks with the heat directed on them.
 
Well lots of different information out there what is targeted and if by PMU rockets and/or Missiles launched by Iran itself.

 
Whelp, I guess Iran wants to see what Trump means when he listed 52 targets. Hopefully it's not anything historically valuable/irreplaceable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top