Trump Investigations Thread

[DarthOne]

this is going to backfire hard they got so used to having a friendly media they forgot how to hide their corruption.

They still do.

 

[DarthOne]

Alan Dershowitz: Judge Merchan's Gag Order and Refusal to Allow Trump to Leave the Courtroom Is Clearly Unconstitutional – Should be Immediately Challenged – Video

Alan Dershowitz: Judge Merchan's Gag Order and Refusal to Allow Trump to Leave the Courtroom Is Clearly Unconstitutional - Should be Immediately Challenged - Video | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Harvard Law School Professor and Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz joined Sean Hannity on Tuesday along with Gregg Jarrett to discuss the current Alvin Bragg lawfare case in New York City against President Donald Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Harvard Law School Professor and Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz joined Sean Hannity on Tuesday along with Gregg Jarrett to discuss the current Alvin Bragg lawfare case in New York City against President Donald Trump.

Jury selection continued on Tuesday morning for Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's lawfare case against Trump related to 'hush payments' made to porn star Stormy Daniels. Last April Trump was hit with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and conspiracy. The charges are unprecedented and illogical.

Alvin Bragg still hasn't named the underlying felony after he twisted the law and somehow upgraded the misdemeanor charges that were past the statute of limitations – to felonies.

The fix is in. The judge overseeing the case is a far-left operative whose daughter has made a lucrative career helping Democrats 'get Trump' and is currently profiting from the case.

After refusing to recuse himself, Judge Juan Merchan on Monday threatened to put President Trump in jail if he doesn't show up for trial.

On Monday, the Marxist tyrannical judge told President Trump that he could be thrown in prison if he did not show up each day in court. This is a clear constitutional violation.

Judge Merchan even warned President Trump about attending his son's high school graduation. This is typical behavior from soulless Marxists as we are quickly learning in America today.

On Tuesday Alan Dershowtiz called on Trump's attorneys to IMMEDIATELY file a motion and challenge Judge Merchan's clearly unconstitutional court orders gagging President Trump and refusing to allow him to campaign or attend his son's graduation.

 

[Zachowon]

This is opening a huge easily appealed situation

 

[DarthOne]

This is opening a huge easily appealed situation

Good Lord, you are naïve if you think that will happen.

 

[Zachowon]

Good Lord, you are naïve if you think that will happen.

It will because there are even liberal judges who will go with the truth and the facts over feelings

 

[DarthOne]

It will because there are even liberal judges who will go with the truth and the facts over feelings

Not for Orange Man.

 

[Vyor]

Not for Orange Man.

Then leave the fucking country and shut the fuck up about something you clearly don't care about.

 

[DarthOne]

Then leave the fucking country and shut the fuck up about something you clearly don't care about.

...how on earth have you reached the 'I don't care' conclusion?

 

[Zachowon]

Not for Orange Man.

I mean, there are still plenty of judges who uphold the law over ideals.
Like Amy Totenburg in GA who so far has ruled against Dominion voting machines

 

[Vyor]

...how on earth have you reached the 'I don't care' conclusion?

Your literal endless bitching.

 

[Poe]

Then leave the fucking country and shut the fuck up about something you clearly don't care about.

Your literal endless bitching.

Jesus, did your mom make the nuggies a little cold this morning or something?

 

[Rocinante]

Your literal endless bitching.

So bitching about something means people DON'T care?
Nah. Darth has a good point. Trump is getting fucked in these legal situations. The law isn't being handled in a fair and just way, and expecting that it suddenly will is being pretty optimistic.

 

[Doomsought]

This is opening a huge easily appealed situation

How many years after the fact?

 

[Abhorsen]

It isn't being handled fairly In NYC. In the other places, I have hope. But it doesn't matter if it's being handled fairly in NYC. There's no need for a conspiracy there, just watch and let the juror pool do it's stuff, and voila, conviction.

There's no point to bitch about the juror pool. And in fact, a low number of bans benefits Trump. Why? because the prosecution gets an equal number.

Basically, you can't ban someone for being pro/anti trump, unless it's a clear massive bias. Trump's only hope is to get 1 pro Trump juror on that jury and hang it. In reality, he needs more than one, as alternates means a random selection of the jury selected (usually they select about 14 or so, then choose 2 at random to toss, IDK exactly how it works in NY, and they might grab more alternates than usual).

So once the ones that struck for cause are gone, you go through your free strikes (in this case 6). With 6 strikes, that means to get a pro trump person on the jury, you need to see 7 (6 strikes plus 1 on the jury) pro trump jurors before seeing 18 (6 strikes plus 12 on the jury) anti-trump. If there were 2 strikes, it would be 3 v 15, which is much better odds. If there were 20 strikes, it would be 21 v 32, which is worse odds.

So the number of free strikes is something we want as low as possible here.

 

[Vyor]

So bitching about something means people DON'T care?
Nah. Darth has a good point. Trump is getting fucked in these legal situations. The law isn't being handled in a fair and just way, and expecting that it suddenly will is being pretty optimistic.

Yeah, see, except that the appeals courts are already ruling in his favor. Repeatedly so. Even in New York.

 

[Zachowon]

Yeah, see, except that the appeals courts are already ruling in his favor. Repeatedly so. Even in New York.

It's just people doodling and glooming

 

[edgeworthy]

This is opening a huge easily appealed situation

Really why?

At the beginning of EVERY criminal case the accused is required to be present during proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled at least 3 times on this very matter.
Rule 43. Defendant's Presence
The purpose of which is in part to protect the defendant.
(So that they cannot be tried in absentia, and have the clear right to confront their accuser)

 

[Zachowon]

Really why?

At the beginning of EVERY criminal case the accused is required to be present during proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled at least 3 times on this very matter.
Rule 43. Defendant's Presence
The purpose of which is in part to protect the defendant.
(So that they cannot be tried in absentia, and have the clear right to confront their accuser)

The jury selection and any kind of unbiased jury of his peers

 

[Vyor]

Really why?

At the beginning of EVERY criminal case the accused is required to be present during proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled at least 3 times on this very matter.
Rule 43. Defendant's Presence
The purpose of which is in part to protect the defendant.
(So that they cannot be tried in absentia, and have the clear right to confront their accuser)

beginning, not the entire thing

 

[Captain X]

Racist journalists are happy because most of the prosecutors going after Trump are black, basically.