United States Trump 2nd Term - Planning and Beyond

Reader mode


Strange, on the day we filed the Epstein lawsuit (April 8), the Justice Department sent us a letter that said they had no records from Pam Bondi's office in response to our records request to her office which was for "all records of communication between Attorney General Bondi
Click to expand...

"Acccckkkkkkshhhuuuaalllly... this is 6 billion degree chess."
 

Article:
Following my Day One Executive Order, the Office of Personnel Management will be issuing new Civil Service Regulations for career government employees. Moving forward, career government employees, working on policy matters, will be classified as “Schedule Policy/Career,” and will be held to the highest standards of conduct and performance. If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the President, or are engaging in corrupt behavior, they should no longer have a job. This is common sense, and will allow the federal government to finally be “run like a business.” We must root out corruption and implement accountability in our Federal Workforce!

Basically, Trump wants to maximize efficiency within the government. More or less, what had been needed for decades, only besides the temporary DOGE, he is now making it a set policy. Replies are a mixed bag of people who praise it and people who dislike it, saying the government is not like a business and that bureaucrats serve the law, not the president's policy.

I would normally agree with that, but considering everything revealed by DOGE and the other unpleasant stuff, I feel like we're long past the point of saying it shouldn't be done. Thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WanderingCrusaderMan said:

Article:
Click to expand...

Article:
Following my Day One Executive Order, the Office of Personnel Management will be issuing new Civil Service Regulations for career government employees. Moving forward, career government employees, working on policy matters, will be classified as “Schedule Policy/Career,” and will be held to the highest standards of conduct and performance. If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the President, or are engaging in corrupt behavior, they should no longer have a job. This is common sense, and will allow the federal government to finally be “run like a business.” We must root out corruption and implement accountability in our Federal Workforce!
 
mrttao said:
Article:
Following my Day One Executive Order, the Office of Personnel Management will be issuing new Civil Service Regulations for career government employees. Moving forward, career government employees, working on policy matters, will be classified as “Schedule Policy/Career,” and will be held to the highest standards of conduct and performance. If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the President, or are engaging in corrupt behavior, they should no longer have a job. This is common sense, and will allow the federal government to finally be “run like a business.” We must root out corruption and implement accountability in our Federal Workforce!
Click to expand...
Still have no idea how to do the article thing.
 
Bacle said:


Dems trying to get rid of the electoral college, again.
Click to expand...

I love how 'restore democracy' translates as if we have never before been one while having the EC.

The irony would be that even if this passed before Trump was elected it would still result in him winning as he won the popular.
 
Last edited:
Buba said:
Constitutional ammendment?
Click to expand...
It isn't happening. Not that I think the American system of government is immune to corruption as both Republicans and Democrats have at separate points in the past tried to slant it in either direction but a 'restoration' of anything needs to be a return to constitutional status quo and that isn't what they are proposing.

Not that it matters anyway, the democrats aren't as inevitable in the upcoming generation as they naively assume themselves to be and the entire abolish the EC idea hedges on them being overwhelmingly ascendant in coming years.
 
Typhonis said:
Besides, the EC is cooked into the Constitution. Thus, they need to make it an amendment.
Click to expand...
Their are ways to subvert it on a state by state basis but ultimately, your right this is just a ploy to keep the debate and narrative going while the dems sort out their internal problems, they don't have the political capitol to even remotely abolish the EC in a constitutional amendment.

The worse they can do is keep pushing this idea.
 
Liberals and conservatives in America should all get guns, especially conservative Trump supporters, but regardless of your alignment. The Neoliberal Far-Left and the Neoconservative Far-Right are getting EXTREMELY fucking violent in their rhetoric.
I remain optimistic, but better safe than sorry.
 
Cherico said:
pretty much everyone here has been well aware that the left doesn't have a damned issue with using violence since the George Flyodd riots.

Were just all left wondering when the worst crazies will finally do something bad enough to get us into a civil war.
Click to expand...
A civil war which wouldn't end well for them, so basically "when will they do something stupid enough as to proverbially slit their own throats?"
 
They want the next group of Democrats that come after them to have the advantage via fraud or 'imported' people who just 'happen' to be asylum seekers.

I think the Electoral college should be expanded to include state Electoral college to state level elections for Senate etc based on counties in the state. Stop redrawing the districts for gerrymandering based on race etc in cities.

It would be about as neutral as possible.

Edit: Maybe.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 9 (members: 3, guests: 6)
Back
Top