...Men's Gymnastics is about stuff like "how high can you get?" Women's Gymnastics is more "what angles can you get your body into". Both are valid interpretations, but also different.
*shrug* Okay, that value is?
Literally the same value as in Men's. duh.
What a silly thing to say, women are not men. We are unequal in most ways. Only the ignorant presume that what works for men, must therefor work "literally the same" for women.
...You literally ignored the entire context of that line including the rest of the post.
I mean that's fair. Neither have much value (to me) so, I'll take it.
You literally made no argument other than "literally the same value as in mens" and "some people like to see peak performance". It's like you're speaking in word salad, "something something context, something something bad faith", and figure if you just throw enough of them out there, your inability to articulate your position in a credible fashion will be forgotten.
www.swimmingworldmagazine.com
He can't go toe-to-toe with men his size and prefers to "win" against athletic women who are probably about 4-5" shorter and 40lbs lighter ... on a good day.Lia Thomas had that big preliminary race against NCAA Swimmers from across the country. This was a big deal since it was the first time she'd compete for a NCAA Swimming Title.
Here is Lia Thomas pictured with the first, second and third place winners in the Women's 500 meter swimming event on the right of the podium.
Virginia Freshman/First Year Swimmer Emma Leyant (a silver medalist in the 2021 Olympics) was surpassed by Lia Thomas by a margin of 1.75 seconds with a time of 4:34.99. Erica Sullivan, a first year out of Texas (hence the hat) took third with a time of 4:35.92. In fourth place and also pictured above is Stanford swimmer Brooke Ford, a fifty year student and another Olympian.
2022 NCAA Women’s Championships Day 2 Finals: Lia Thomas Wins 500 Freestyle 'It Means the World'
The 2022 NCAA Women’s Championships Day 2 Finals: 500 Freestyle. The second night of the NCAA meet kicked off with the 500 freestyle.
Lia Thomas had that big preliminary race against NCAA Swimmers from across the country. This was a big deal since it was the first time she'd compete for a NCAA Swimming Title.
Here is Lia Thomas pictured with the first, second and third place winners in the Women's 500 meter swimming event on the right of the podium.
Virginia Freshman/First Year Swimmer Emma Leyant (a silver medalist in the 2021 Olympics) was surpassed by Lia Thomas by a margin of 1.75 seconds with a time of 4:34.99. Erica Sullivan, a first year out of Texas (hence the hat) took third with a time of 4:35.92. In fourth place and also pictured above is Stanford swimmer Brooke Ford, a fifty year student and another Olympian.
2022 NCAA Women’s Championships Day 2 Finals: Lia Thomas Wins 500 Freestyle 'It Means the World'
The 2022 NCAA Women’s Championships Day 2 Finals: 500 Freestyle. The second night of the NCAA meet kicked off with the 500 freestyle.
I see that you've never had the pleasure of playing an MMO with open world PvP where a max level player can wander into low-mid level zones and oneshot all the nublets trying to quest. Some people cannot be reasoned with, they just want to win, and the level of competition does not matter.
Goldman's Dilemma. This is a classic question and its results have been repeated many, many times over several decades. More than half of athletes questioned said they would take a drug guaranteed to kill them in five years if it also guaranteed gold medals along the way. The idea that at least some of those people would be willing to suffer merely the effects of transition for a guaranteed win isn't remotely a stretcher.
...Did you actually read the article you posted? Back when the question was first asked, yes. When they repeated it in recent years it dropped down to "12% would take it if it was illegal and otherwise harmless" and far less would take it if it was lethal.
Please, please tell me you're joking and not actually that naive. Please tell me you didn't take everything in a Wikipedia article at face value without investigating. Please?
Maybe, but pick your links better anyway.
