The War in Afghanistan

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
I also say we nuke North Korea.
Not because I am racist but because fuck the hassle they have caused us.
Hell, I think MacArthur should have nuked China in the 50s
And this is why you are simply a morally bad person. You are willing to murder people simply because they are in your way. You don't care about the innocent civilian lives at all.

Seriously, why do people advocate for nuclear war? What is wrong with people?
 

King Arts

Well-known member
I also say we nuke North Korea.
Not because I am racist but because fuck the hassle they have caused us.
Hell, I think MacArthur should have nuked China in the 50s
Yes back then it would have been good and prevented much suffering by ending Mao and preventing horror like the cultural revolution.
Now the cultural revolution ended and nuking China now would help nobody.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Yes back then it would have been good and prevented much suffering by ending Mao and preventing horror like the cultural revolution.
Now the cultural revolution ended and nuking China now would help nobody.
Even back then it wouldn't have been a good idea. If murdering everyone is the only way to save them from the cultural revolution, I don't see that as an improvement.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
And this is why you are simply a morally bad person. You are willing to murder people simply because they are in your way. You don't care about the innocent civilian lives at all.

Seriously, why do people advocate for nuclear war? What is wrong with people?
Against the norskies you only have one option. Because you may not have a choice against them
Even back then it wouldn't have been a good idea. If murdering everyone is the only way to save them from the cultural revolution, I don't see that as an improvement.
Idk, getting rid of Mao...
 

Free-Stater 101

Freedom Means Freedom!!!
Nuke Mod
Moderator
Staff Member
Except it is a valid thing because of how it was going.
Zack this is me giving a single friendly warning on this subject, genocide is wrong, I don't care what you think they did, the fact is that for all of the cess pitts that they are, neither NK nor The Middle East possess any sort of an immediate credible military threat to justify an unprovoked attack of such magnitude.

Final warning keep going and you are looking at a possible ban for genocide
advocacy of all things and you know better.

P.S. Abhorsen is right please do some soul searching, think long and hard on this subject.
 
Last edited:

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Alright. I apologize for how it sounded.
My work humor slipped onto here and I may have went with it to long.
My apologies
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The Federal Aviation Administration has eased rules to allow airliners to fly over Afghanistan!

For mysterious reasons however, only Afghan (and some Iranian) airlines actually engage in the pleasure of flying over Taliban Afghanistan. It's unknown what possible concerns they could have, ranging from the thousands of MANPADs and short range air defense systems still in country, the multiple ongoing insurgencies or worst of all, having a civil air emergency and having to land at a Taliban Afghanistan Airport.


Thus alas... even if you can, airliners still aren't...
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Thousands of MANPADs? I don't recall USA issuing any to ANA and those from the 80s are way past the use date, while the Taliban manage to acquire only a handful in the last decade (thanks to Quatar) and probably have those under control, a precious asset and all that.
The place with most ''wild'' MANPADs nowadays are Syria and Libya, followed by EU.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Thousands of MANPADs? I don't recall USA issuing any to ANA and those from the 80s are way past the use date, while the Taliban manage to acquire only a handful in the last decade (thanks to Quatar) and probably have those under control, a precious asset and all that.
The place with most ''wild'' MANPADs nowadays are Syria and Libya, followed by EU.

Random thought but the term ‘wild MANPADs’ makes me think of the various spoof Nature Documentaries you see people make for amusement on YouTube.

“Here we see the majestic wild MANPAD in its natural habitat…”
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Thousands of MANPADs? I don't recall USA issuing any to ANA and those from the 80s are way past the use date, while the Taliban manage to acquire only a handful in the last decade (thanks to Quatar) and probably have those under control, a precious asset and all that.
The place with most ''wild'' MANPADs nowadays are Syria and Libya, followed by EU.

Comes from the disputed Rand Study of 4500 MANPADs.


I think their biggest issue, which I made pretty obvious, was having to land in Taliban Afghanistan in case of an emergency.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Comes from the disputed Rand Study of 4500 MANPADs.

It's bullshit number, they just counted MANPADs that Soviets delivered to the communists and CIA to mujaheddin, those MANPADs are long rendered useless, it's only the handful of recent acquisition that are useful. Hell, that report still has Yugoslavia, that shows just how well researched it is.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
Comes from the disputed Rand Study of 4500 MANPADs.


I think their biggest issue, which I made pretty obvious, was having to land in Taliban Afghanistan in case of an emergency.
Ironically, if an airline did have to make an emergency landing in Afghanistan, the Taliban may actually help them and send them on their merry way again because it's not in their interests to act like dicks to a bunch of foreign civilians.

They want to be seen as a legitimate government, so they're acting like one -- making trade deals, instituting fiscal policies, et cetera. They basically learned/inherited that from the American administration/puppet government.

Meanwhile, you have American Lefties still screeching about Afghani transtrenders, Groomers United's rights, and feminism under Taliban rule. shrug
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Ironically, if an airline did have to make an emergency landing in Afghanistan, the Taliban may actually help them and send them on their merry way again because it's not in their interests to act like dicks to a bunch of foreign civilians.

They want to be seen as a legitimate government, so they're acting like one -- making trade deals, instituting fiscal policies, et cetera. They basically learned/inherited that from the American administration/puppet government.

Meanwhile, you have American Lefties still screeching about Afghani transtrenders, Groomers United's rights, and feminism under Taliban rule. shrug
The "may" is the issue here. It indeed may happen. They, or some of them, may also get detained by the Taliban for who knows what reason for months, like this guy.
The total unpredictability is the issue.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
The "may" is the issue here. It indeed may happen. They, or some of them, may also get detained by the Taliban for who knows what reason for months, like this guy.
The total unpredictability is the issue.
He's a dumbass that went there voluntarily, which is never a good idea. But I see your point and agree with it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top