Please give an example of something that you would consider immoral.
In relation to what? Conquest? Genocide for the lulz, pointless destruction that doesn't really serve a purpose to anything. Slavery because it makes no damn sense.. and so on and so forth. Behavioral and social engineering is immoral because it sets us at odds with our own DNA and always ends in disaster.
Conquest is an extension of our ape instincts, a desire to push the troop/clan to the farthest extension possible. It's inherently part of what makes us human. Doing it in a way that damages the species, harms us and wastes resources would be immoral.
Darwinism is a lousy thing to base morality on in general. A society run on Darwinistic rules would be considered a nightmare by any sane person. Not that people didn't try in the early 20th century ... and culminated in trying to genocide themselves when they lost their bid for world conquest, because Darwin demanded it.
Because Wotan demanded it. Hitler and his like were a bunch of degenerate Neopagan animals who larped at being Darwinistic. Not that Social Darwinism applied on a large scale is possible, mostly because no government on earth exists wherein the fit and the worthy govern.
They're all run by weak, mediocre, defective, dumb and pathetic people. Because Governments exist to give shelter to the unemployable and the undeserving.
Except 'fitness' has far more to do with culture and people's decisions than it does with innate physiology. Even physiology is heavily dependent upon culture and people's decisions.
Darwinism presumes biological basis for fitness.
Someone who is morbidly obese, diabetic and missing a foot but who also revolutionizes the energy sector..is someone who is obviously fit.
Certain groups put too much emphasis on aesthetics
only, which I admit are incredibly important. But to a degree, ugliness and these androgynous freaks and trannies are almost always a symptom of a culture on the verge of either collapse or a violent correction.
But not because they look weird and cut their nuts off.
Their existence is symptomatic of a larger cultural failing.
Failing to address one while overfocusing on the other ends in ruin.
Difficult fence to walk basically.
More like using science as a vehicle for self-idolatry. Every 19th century "race scientist" just so happened, very mysteriously, to "discover" that his own country was made up of the truly superior ones.
Social Deconstructivism is neither scientific nor particularly secular. It's another, incredibly violent religion that focuses on blood and death and destruction and one that fetishizes a bastards take on Science and wields it like holy scripture in a shitty justifification.
A century ago we had Hitler, a century before that we had the secularists and today we have the Alphabet people, their activists and the identitarian left.
Just a new sect of that old, ugly fedora cult, that demands mutilation, child rape and societal peril as forms of worship and as offerings.
