No 'I assert this' is not 'proof enough.'
If we're going to argue at the level of 'I say so, therefore it is,' then I have a simple counter-argument:
You're wrong.
There. I win the argument. Now either get some real evidence and argumentation, or admit you're just pushing a line of propaganda you swallowed at some point. You haven't even bothered to try to come up with responses to any points others made.
Arguments?
1.King Philipp war.Those who do not get murdered must leave their lands.
2.Mexico was conqered in 1520 and most of population is still metises.USA after 1650 and all indians on East are white people cosplaing as indians.Since both communities was settled,and both suffered 90% death from plagues,then,if anglos do not genocide locals,there still would be local metise population there.
Now,back to topic - we are taking about antisemitism,not anglos genocide.So :
1.Daniel Rufeisen,polish jew was saved by polish nuns which would all die if german discovered him.He later become catholic monk as result,and go to Israel,when authorities refused to gave him citizenship - becouse for them jew who baptize is no longer jew.
Antisemites.
2.Rosalind Moss - she was succesfull jew,but decided to become catholic nun.Result? those jews who still belived stop cintacting her ,becouse she was traitor for them.
Antisemites,again.