Russian-Ukrainian-Polish Eternal Friendship Thread

Dont forget some of the far right neo nazis that are in Ukraine fighting the Russians. Why would the US Support them! They are evil!

Well it also alludes to the fact apparently the only Ukrainians who apparently are capable of independent thought are the Neo-Nazis.

The Color Revolutions, Arab Spring, Euromaiden, ISIS and so forth... That's all work of the CIA against legitimate governments. There's no actual grassroots illegitimacy. They're all paid crisis actors and terrorists incapable of having independent thoughts of their own. CIA is behind it all. Just go back and look at the history of the CIA. It's flawless victories all the way!
 
So Germany is bowing down to RUssia.
Its not because they want to, its because they are ruled by idiots who are being played like a fiddle.
Add all these news together, what's the result?
Last 3 decades of Russia's energy policy and political influence operations, overt and covert, were designed to arrange for situations like this to happen. Well played.
 
Well it also alludes to the fact apparently the only Ukrainians who apparently are capable of independent thought are the Neo-Nazis.

The Color Revolutions, Arab Spring, Euromaiden, ISIS and so forth... That's all work of the CIA against legitimate governments. There's no actual grassroots illegitimacy. They're all paid crisis actors and terrorists incapable of having independent thoughts of their own. CIA is behind it all. Just go back and look at the history of the CIA. It's flawless victories all the way!
I mean apperently.

Ah, I see what you did there
Its not because they want to, its because they are ruled by idiots who are being played like a fiddle.
Add all these news together, what's the result?
Last 3 decades of Russia's energy policy and political influence operations, overt and covert, were designed to arrange for situations like this to happen. Well played.
So now more then ever is a great time for Russia to do stuff because Germany is well....dependent on them.
Is France the savior we need?
 
Its not because they want to, its because they are ruled by idiots who are being played like a fiddle.
Add all these news together, what's the result?
Last 3 decades of Russia's energy policy and political influence operations, overt and covert, were designed to arrange for situations like this to happen. Well played.

They saw dollar signs (euro signs?) and to hell with everything else. Germany is not exactly a paragon of long-term thinking…
 
I mean apperently.

Ah, I see what you did there

So now more then ever is a great time for Russia to do stuff because Germany is well....dependent on them.
Is France the savior we need?
France to begin with was one of less Russia interested country and just wanted to do business with it. And they still kinda are. But that's still a better attitude than being held by the balls through potential grand energy crisis like Germany.
 
I love how the US IC varies being drooling out of the side of its mouth being surprised by things like the Taliban, Color Revolutions and Arab Spring to being the mastermind behind them all... And then back and forth as politics dictate.

The IC community does a thankless job and gets treated as everyone’s favorite whipping boy because it’s politically convenient. They know they’re not allowed to speak off the cuff (usually) so they always make perfect strawmen. Before this they would have been blaming “the Zionist Jewish conspiracy” or some other nonsense.
 
France to begin with was one of less Russia interested country and just wanted to do business with it. And they still kinda are. But that's still a better attitude than being held by the balls through potential grand energy crisis like Germany.
France is willing to do what ever to have a strong military again though.
The IC community does a thankless job and gets treated as everyone’s favorite whipping boy because it’s politically convenient. They know they’re not allowed to speak off the cuff (usually) so they always make perfect strawmen. Before this they would have been blaming “the Zionist Jewish conspiracy” or some other nonsense.
Exactly
 
So Germany is bowing down to RUssia.
Huh, sounds just like what the new Germany would do.
Hell, i am sure you are enjoying seeing Russia as the good guys, even though they would probrably hate every policy you ever want....
I see Russia not as a good guy or bad guy, but as a nation with legit and justified fears about warhawks like you in the west. I also understand the difference between Ukraine and other situations; its why I'm fine keeping troops in the Baltics, Balkans, and Poland, but not deploying them to Ukraine.

The US military loves using Russia as a boogeyman to try to get budgets passed and try to use them as a 'uniting' enemy to attempt to use to focus the US public away from problem at home.

Also, there are issues I agree with Russia on, such as addressing permafrost integrity. Russia isn't any sort of paragon, but neither are we, and the posturing around all this is tedious and tiresome.
Also, there is a lot more going on then you know Bacle. you are ignorant and think that america not getting invovled is a good thing. it just makes sure that we are a lauging stock, and are walked over. This WILL lead to us having to go to a war we could have avoided. Either with China or Russia, or both. Because we BOTH know shit will hit the fan soon. You just want to put your hands in your ears and go "MAD MAD MAD MAD MAD MAD MAD".
I don't care if the US is a laughing stock, because our internal issues have already made us one, and no amount of military adventurism is going to fix that.

Also, I disagree a war with Russia or the CCP is inevitable, and think people like you spout that off to continue justifying DoD budgets more than anything.

And you can try to ignore MAD all you want, but the US public has not forgotten it exists and has no desire for any conflict that risks MAD with a peer opponent.
But that’s just it, it’s not an option. It doesn’t solve anything, nor would it do anything to de-escalate tensions. Sure, Russia would be happy in that they get a chunk of Ukraine without firing a shot, but that just means they’re closer to the finish line when they come back for the next round. And make no mistake, there will be a next round.



There’s a lot to cover here, but the short form is, you’re taking data points and making assumptions based on things not in evidence. And just because people on SB that you disagree with were supporting it doesn’t automatically mean they’re wrong.

Example: You’re taking the Biden/Burisma thing and concluding that it’s proof that that’s the only reason anyone cares about Ukraine, when all it really does is just confirm Hunter Biden has been making money trading on his dad’s name, and that the elder Biden was either too stupid to realize this or else did realize it and was just being “Mr. Typical Corrupt Politician.” (This being Joe Biden we’re talking about, either option is entirely plausible, and I’m not making a judgment either way, at least not in this thread).

Anyway…to the topic at hand.

The Color Revolutions were very much domestically driven. In fact, I should note that during the original Rose Revolution in Georgia, the U.S. and Russia were both throwing their support behind Eduard Shevardnadze (at least initially; it wasn’t until later that it dawned on the U.S. that this wasn’t some flash in a pan and they switched their support to Saakashvili -who is himself quite a figure and actually came up during the Maidan protests). Basically, what happened was that after 10+ years of the same old shit, the people in the various republics decided to opt for some changes. This wasn’t just confined to Ukraine and Georgia; it happened in Kyrgyzstan as well, which if you look at a map you’ll notice is nowhere near Europe.*)

The whining about involvement of Western intelligence is one that goes back to the Soviet days. Basically, it’s Russia propaganda meant for domestic consumption, because if the Russians knew just how incompetent their leaders are** they’d storm the Kremlin and summarily execute them all.

In fact, the Orange Revolution in some ways was a loss for the U.S., because under Leonid Kuchma (the incumbent, whose chosen heir was Yanukovych), the Ukrainians had sent troops to Iraq in support of the U.S. When Yushchenko took office, one of the first things he did was withdraw his support from that endeavor and called the troops home.

The Russia collusion/Trump thing…I can see why you’d be skeptical of anything the press says, but it’s also important to note that this didn’t come in a vacuum. Sure, consider it a cautionary tale in taking news at face value, but don’t automatically assume that the source of the story is lying, or that anyone who disagreed with the story is always going to be telling the truth, either.

Ukraine may be a corrupt state but it’s not some “shithole” country (which term was applied to sub-Saharan Africa which…well…as bad as Ukraine might be it’s not that bad). Ukraine is a country with a fair amount of natural resources, was the breadbasket of the USSR, and has a few other advantages going for it. It’s one of the biggest countries in Europe, borders a couple of other major NATO and EU members, is located right on the Black Sea and close to the Western world, and has tremendous economic potential.

The West has been taking an interest in Ukraine since the collapse of the USSR because of that. It’s popped up more recently in the news as focus shifted away from the Middle East/Southwest Asia and the war on terror, but I can assure you, interest in Ukraine didn’t come about because of MH-17 and Crimea, or the Orange Revolution. It was always there; it just became more noticeable because Russia started reverting to its historical MO in full view.

*-One random fact I learned during grad school is that Kyrgyzstan has a German minority -in fact, so does Kazakhstan- partly as a result of a bunch of POWs from the Wehrmacht that got deported to the interior and were released but left there after the end of World War II.

More significantly, I’d note that Kyrgyzstan in 2005 had a U.S. presence because it had an air base at Manas for supporting operations in Afghanistan.

So it’s important to remember, correlation =/= causation.
Actually, the stuff on SB had me cheering the Maidan at the time, because I naively believed it was completely organic.

I'm not that naive anymore, and the things that have happened in the world since then have made me see the US as no more righteous than Russia or the CCP.

I am also more aware of the way the US IC loves to try to do deniable domestic ops in other nations or support them when they happen (Ghadaffi comes to mind).

As I said, I trust neither DC nor Moscow's narrative on the Ukraine situation, and am very, very suspicious of the way self-admitted warmongers and neocons seem rather excited about us possibly sending forces to directly confront Russia over Ukraine.

I also am not so naive as to think that MAD is not a distinct possibility we risk if US troops formally enter Ukraine to counter the Russians. MAD would not just end the US and Russian as world powers, it would likely be the end of advanced human civilization for centuries and would irradiate a lot of the planet.
 
Last edited:
I see Russia not as a good guy or bad guy, but as a nation with legit and justified fears about warhawks like you in the west. I also understand the difference between Ukraine and other situations; its why I'm fine keeping troops in the Baltics, Balkans, and Poland, but not deploying them to Ukraine.

The US military loves using Russia as a boogeyman to try to get budgets passed and try to use them as a 'uniting' enemy to attempt to use to focus the US public away from problem at home.

Also, there are issues I agree with Russia on, such as addressing permafrost integrity. Russia isn't any sort of paragon, but neither are we, and the posturing aroynd all this is tedious and tiresome.
I don't care if the US is a laughing stock, because our internal issues have already made us one, and no amount of military adventurism is giloung to fix that.

Also, I disagree a war with Russia or the CCP is inevitable, and think people like you spiyt that off to continue justifying DoD budgets more than anything.

And you can try to ignore MAD all you want, but the US public has not forgotten it exists and has no desire for any conflict that risks MAD with a peer opponent.Actually, the stuff on SB had me cheering the Maidan at the time, because I naively believed it was completely organic.

I'm not that naive anymore, and the things that have happened in the world since then have made me see the US as no more righteous than Russia or the CCP.

I am also more aware of the way the US IC loves to try to do deniable domestic ops in other nations or support them when they happen (Ghadaffi comes to mind).

As I said, I trust neither DC not Moscow's narrative on the Ukraine situation, and am very, very suspicious of the way self-admitted warmongers and neocons seem rather excited about us possibly sending forces to directly confront Russia over Ukraine.

I also am not so naive as to think that MAD is not a distinct possibility we risk if US troops formally enter Ukraine to counter the Russians. MAD would not just end the US and Russian as world powers, it would likely be the end of advanced human civilization for centuries and would irradiate a lot of the planet.
Bacle.
A military with no experience or enemy to fight is more useless then a small but expeierenced one.
THAT is what will happen if we do not go to war.
We will be like China.

I can assure you though. War IS around the corner, and MAD will not happen.
Nukes dont worj like in movies unless it is a ground det
 
Bacle.
A military with no experience or enemy to fight is more useless then a small but expeierenced one.
THAT is what will happen if we do not go to war.
We will be like China.

I can assure you though. War IS around the corner, and MAD will not happen.
Nukes dont worj like in movies unless it is a ground det
I'd rather have a smaller, inexperienced military that mostly exist for anti-piracy and coast guard uses, with a secure nuclear triad to ward off any moves against CONUS, than continue to allow warmongers like you to try to get us into more wars.

And the way you speak about needing wars to keep our troops 'expereinced' is part of why I am suspisiocs of the US IC trying to push Color Revolutions and the like, just to create conflicts to participate in.

Like Zach, you have damn near singlehandedly convinced me, via your actions and rhetoric around this stuff and the way you have defended the actions of damn near anything the DoD/IC does, that the US military industrial complex and IC is far less righteous than any of the PR it likes to put out, and that the most realistic take on the US military in fiction is MASH and not for good reasons.

It feels very much to me like the US military wants to relive the glory of WW2, because it's been humiliated time and again in COIN operations and is not viewed as highly as it used to be. It feels like this is more about the US military's wounded pride and ego looking to be soothed, than anything close to a legit cause to risk MAD.
 
France to begin with was one of less Russia interested country and just wanted to do business with it. And they still kinda are. But that's still a better attitude than being held by the balls through potential grand energy crisis like Germany.

I don't understand the irrational fear of nuclear power plants, Like if they want to be "green" then that is the only realistic option. These little wind farms and solar panels are a joke and a waste of time.
 
I'd rather have a smaller, inexperienced military that mostly exist for anti-piracy and coast guard uses, with a secure nuclear triad to ward off any moves against CONUS, than continue to allow warmongers like you to try to get us into more wars.

And the way you speak about needing wars to keep our troops 'expereinced' is part of why I am suspisiocs of the US IC trying to push Color Revolutions and the like, just to create conflicts to participate in.

Like Zach, you have damn near singlehandedly convinced me, via your actions and rhetoric around this stuff and the way you have defended the actions of damn near anything the DoD/IC does, that the US military industrial complex and IC is far less righteous than any of the PR it likes to put out, and that the most realistic take on the US military in fiction is MASH and not for good reasons.

It feels very much to me like the US military wants to relive the glory of WW2, because it's been humiliated time and again in COIN operations and is not viewed as highly as it used to be. It feels like this is more about the US military's wounded pride and ego looking to be soothed, than anything close to a legit cause to risk MAD.
I am a LOT more of a warmonger then majority of the IC.
I am also going to volunteer to go to front line duty at all times
 
I am a LOT more of a warmonger then majority of the IC.
I am also going to volunteer to go to front line duty at all times
That doesn't change or refute anything I've said or pointed out; in fact it reinforces it.

You want to go die on the front lines in some war, fine.

Do not expect many people in the US public to want to join you or support the wars you want.
 
I see Russia not as a good guy or bad guy, but as a nation with legit and justified fears about warhawks like you in the west. I also understand the difference between Ukraine and other situations; its why I'm fine keeping troops in the Baltics, Balkans, and Poland, but not deploying them to Ukraine.

The US military loves using Russia as a boogeyman to try to get budgets passed and try to use them as a 'uniting' enemy to attempt to use to focus the US public away from problem at home.

Also, there are issues I agree with Russia on, such as addressing permafrost integrity. Russia isn't any sort of paragon, but neither are we, and the posturing around all this is tedious and tiresome.
I don't care if the US is a laughing stock, because our internal issues have already made us one, and no amount of military adventurism is going to fix that.

Also, I disagree a war with Russia or the CCP is inevitable, and think people like you spout that off to continue justifying DoD budgets more than anything.

And you can try to ignore MAD all you want, but the US public has not forgotten it exists and has no desire for any conflict that risks MAD with a peer opponent.Actually, the stuff on SB had me cheering the Maidan at the time, because I naively believed it was completely organic.

I'm not that naive anymore, and the things that have happened in the world since then have made me see the US as no more righteous than Russia or the CCP.

I am also more aware of the way the US IC loves to try to do deniable domestic ops in other nations or support them when they happen (Ghadaffi comes to mind).

As I said, I trust neither DC nor Moscow's narrative on the Ukraine situation, and am very, very suspicious of the way self-admitted warmongers and neocons seem rather excited about us possibly sending forces to directly confront Russia over Ukraine.

I also am not so naive as to think that MAD is not a distinct possibility we risk if US troops formally enter Ukraine to counter the Russians. MAD would not just end the US and Russian as world powers, it would likely be the end of advanced human civilization for centuries and would irradiate a lot of the planet.

Bacle, with all due respect, you keep fretting about US troops getting sent to the Ukraine. Who’s giving that order, how and when? No, generalizations like the “evil military industrial complex and warhawks” will not do. Show me someone in DC, in the Pentagon or State department that’s actually come out to publicly advocate such a move. Otherwise this is just coming off as a circle jerk with the likes of Greenwald, Tucker Carlson, Gabbard, Timcast and other isolationists who keep beating upon a political strawman where there are plenty more legit issues to smack the Biden Admin around with like inflation, the southern border, crime, etc.

As for the US not being righteous…sorry if I come off as a cynic, but gee, welcome to realpolitik. That said, I’d prefer the US to the CCCP or Russia. You’re at least allowed the freedom to criticize your own government here, for now anyway.
 
Lets also not forget the sort of leadership the US military currently has.

oCbwa4W.jpg
 
Bacle, with all due respect, you keep fretting about US troops getting sent to the Ukraine. Who’s giving that order, how and when? No, generalizations like the “evil military industrial complex and warhawks” will not do. Show me someone in DC, in the Pentagon or State department that’s actually come out to publicly advocate such a move. Otherwise this is just coming off as a circle jerk with the likes of Greenwald, Tucker Carlson, Gabbard, Timcast and other isolationists who keep beating upon a political strawman where there are plenty more legit issues to smack the Biden Admin around with like inflation, the southern border, crime, etc.
NATO Article 5 is still a thing, and it seems very much like certain NATO nations want to get involved on the ground in Ukraine.

Like, right now the mostly likely scenario seems to be Poland demanding US troops enter Ukraine to counter the Russia forces.

As well one of our Ohio-class SSGNs is now in the Med, along with a CVBG, and it's been reported they are there due to the tensions in Ukraine. Us Tomahawking or airstriking Russian troops on behalf of Kiev is a real possibility I fear if things go the way Zach seems to want.
As for the US not being righteous…sorry if I come off as a cynic, but gee, welcome to realpolitik. That said, I’d prefer the US to the CCCP or Russia. You’re at least allowed the freedom to criticize your own government here, for now anyway.
Sure, for now.

Except you know the whole way that the Left have tried to just use corpo's to censor things for the gov, to avoid Constitutional issues, the whole stolen election, the Jan 6th political prisoners, and the way the DoD seems to be gearing up for domestic operations as well.

I think we are one bad day away from Biden and his handlers trying to go full Palpatine, and a war would give them powers not even thier Wu Flu bullshit could grant them.

The less power and funding the US military has right now, the less likely they are to try to get us into some dumb foreign war, and makes them less capable of being turned against thier fellow citizens.
 
NATO Article 5 is still a thing, and it seems very much like certain NATO nations want to get involved on the ground in Ukraine.

Like, right now the mostly likely scenario seems to be Poland demanding US troops enter Ukraine to counter the Russia forces.

Poland can request whatever the hell they want, it doesn't mean it'll happen. And Ukraine isn't a NATO member, so Article 5 doesn't mean a damn thing.

As well one of our Ohio-class SSGNs is now in the Med, along with a CVBG, and it's been reported they are there due to the tensions in Ukraine. Us Tomahawking or airstriking Russian troops on behalf of Kiev is a real possibility I fear if things go the way Zach seems to want.

Okay, so a couple of things. First off, the U.S. sending military assets close to a region where shit is liable to pop off even if it doesn't involve us being shot at is a thing we've been doing since the earliest days of the Cold War. This is *doubly* true when it's the Mediterranean, where we've typically kept a carrier (and side note, it's a carrier strike group, not a CVBG, which hasn't been a thing since the early 2000s) on station because a not insignificant number of NATO member states are located on its shores. It's not there to hit the Russians; it's there in case for some reason the Russians decide to up the ante and we end up having to respond. "Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it" as the saying goes, which we learned the hard way with Korea in 1950.

Sure, for now.

Except you know the whole way that the Left have tried to just use corpo's to censor things for the gov, to avoid Constitutional issues, the whole stolen election, the Jan 6th political prisoners, and the way the DoD seems to be gearing up for domestic operations as well.

I think we are one bad day away from Biden and his handlers trying to go full Palpatine, and a war would give them powers not even thier Wu Flu bullshit could grant them.

The less power and funding the US military has right now, the less likely they are to try to get us into some dumb foreign war, and makes them less capable of being turned against thier fellow citizens.

Okay, seriously. You need to take your tinfoil hat off because it's clearly not letting blood circulate to your brain. Stop conflating different issues. Domestic politics and "the left and corporations driving this" are things that only someone who's completely ignorant of reality would say. And the fact that you "know the truth of Maidan" only serves to reinforce that you went full retard in only believing sources that "tell the truth" -when in reality those idiots would be hard pressed to tell you basic things like "what does the treaty over Ukrainian security mean", who the parties to it are, etc instead of taking the time to look into this from other sources -and yes, that includes sources like the New York Times, National Review, the Wall Street Journal, BBC, etc. Will there be bias, yes. But you have to account for that and look for what facts all of them agree on, and you need to look at your current sources far more critically.

Seriously. Chill out, and stop listening to the shock jocks and YouTubers whose only goals are to sensationalize the news and generate clicks and follows (and revenue as a result).
 
Found a cool article about the entire 2014 fiasco, and a quick look over the Wikipedia page seems to fit most of it.


It just really, really comes off as a Color Revolution. The president didn't want to sign a trade and political friendship treaty and then this shit started? A well known Neocon and a Neolib show up in Ukraine just before it happen to speak? Glowing support from media in the west? Massive white washing of the complicated nature of the issues and people involved on the "revolution to make for a pretty headline? It all looks just too convenient, especially knowing now the Biden-Ukraine thing which implies the people who were on the winning side made the best of their new connections.

You ask me, Ukraine knew they were in a shit spot and for 2 decades they tactfully played the Finnish tactic of trying to stay on the good side of both the East and West. The President in 2013 saw signing the treaty as a bit too much of a western push and decided to wait as he didn't want to fuck with Putin and for this they pulled a color revolution to get a more obedient guy. And now Ukraine is paying the price for the Western arrogance by getting fucked by Russia.
 
Poland can request whatever the hell they want, it doesn't mean it'll happen. And Ukraine isn't a NATO member, so Article 5 doesn't mean a damn thing.
I know that, but the Biden connections to Ukraine change the situation.

Remember a phone call with the head of Ukraine and even mentioning Biden/Burinsma caused the First Impeachment.
Okay, so a couple of things. First off, the U.S. sending military assets close to a region where shit is liable to pop off even if it doesn't involve us being shot at is a thing we've been doing since the earliest days of the Cold War. This is *doubly* true when it's the Mediterranean, where we've typically kept a carrier (and side note, it's a carrier strike group, not a CVBG, which hasn't been a thing since the early 2000s) on station because a not insignificant number of NATO member states are located on its shores. It's not there to hit the Russians; it's there in case for some reason the Russians decide to up the ante and we end up having to respond. "Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it" as the saying goes, which we learned the hard way with Korea in 1950.
Yes, I know the CV being there is, that's expected.

The Ohio class is a very different matter.

I think the last time they had one there was under Trump when he struck Assad.
Okay, seriously. You need to take your tinfoil hat off because it's clearly not letting blood circulate to your brain. Stop conflating different issues. Domestic politics and "the left and corporations driving this" are things that only someone who's completely ignorant of reality would say. And the fact that you "know the truth of Maidan" only serves to reinforce that you went full retard in only believing sources that "tell the truth" -when in reality those idiots would be hard pressed to tell you basic things like "what does the treaty over Ukrainian security mean", who the parties to it are, etc instead of taking the time to look into this from other sources -and yes, that includes sources like the New York Times, National Review, the Wall Street Journal, BBC, etc. Will there be bias, yes. But you have to account for that and look for what facts all of them agree on, and you need to look at your current sources far more critically.

Seriously. Chill out, and stop listening to the shock jocks and YouTubers whose only goals are to sensationalize the news and generate clicks and follows (and revenue as a result).
I don't know the 'truth' of Maidan, but everything I've seen about it since it happened...there was discontent at home with the pres at the time, and as I said I was cheering on the Maidan when it happened.

The whole MH17 thing also complicated it in a massive way, and created justified anger in the West; that was a massive fuck up on Russia/the rebels side that didn't have anything to do with the conflict.

I thought the new gov was going to be a huge change in the course of the nation for the better for a long time after Maidan, but now it just looks like another civil war we decided we needed to stick our dick in, with the added bonus of this time being able to directly fuck with what used to be part of the Russia heartland. It's the same folly over lines on a map written without the consent of the people there, this time under Gorbachev, that has screwed things up for Ukraine. Plus the whole radioactive fuckup that was Chernobyl and showed the flaws in the USSRs way of operating, which I get Ukraine has legit beef with Russia about, plus the whole Holomodor issue.

Since then, with what the Ukraine situation has turned into...it looks like another US/Allied IC backed or supported event, even if it had an organic base.

Everything else that has happened since the Wu Flu got out, the Impeachment of Trump over that phone call, EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL, and the way the exit from Afghanistan was handled...the trust in the institutions is gone and Zach's warmongering while being in the IC, plus what I'm seeing from some neocon/neolib voices about Ukraine...I think there is a faction trying to get Biden to engage Russia in combat/war directly in/over Ukraine, and that scares me deeply. Ukraine is not in NATO, as you've said, and thus article 5 doesn't apply. However we also have posters like Marduk, who seem to want to go all Winged Hussars on the situation, or for the US to do it in the stead as part of NATO.

Many of you mistake me for being pro-Putin/Kremlin, when in reality I'm tired of pretending the shit of both doesn't stink in this situation. If I was pro-Kremlin, I'd want US troops out of Poland and the Baltics and for us to step selling weapons to Keiv; I want neither.

Zach just keeps putting words in my mouth and exaggerating what I say, which is part of the problem here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top