Russian-Ukrainian-Polish Eternal Friendship Thread

So in essence you see any geopolitical rival as a threat to our existence, to be broken or destroyed as soon as possible?

I just want to make sure I am not putting words in your mouth, if I am misunderstanding your position.
If we want to sell weapons to Ukraine, that's one thing, and doesn't ruffle my feathers too much.

Putting uniformed US forces on the ground in expectation of getting into a shooting war with Russia is a whole other matter.

However certain warhawk factions in the US military industrial complex and DC would really like to get into a 'justified' shooting war to prove how big and strong the US military is.

Bacle, WHO are these warhawks you keep saying that want us in a war with Russia over the Ukraine? I want names, I want to know what they’ve said. I need to see and hear specifics, not just conspiracy theories which sadly appears is becoming the norm in US politics.
 
Okay.
Why should we just let soveirgn countries be invaded and taken over?
Not a single person has ever explained to me about this
Because we created that situation in the first place, by basically trying to do the exact same thing; just with a bit more circuitous method in the form of regime change.
 
Bacle, WHO are these warhawks you keep saying that want us in a war with Russia over the Ukraine? I want names, I want to know what they’ve said. I need to see and hear specifics, not just conspiracy theories which sadly appears is becoming the norm in US politics.
Zachowan, for one, and I've seen a lot of the old neocons echoing the same sentiments.

Also seeing it establishment media Twitter as well.

There are people who really expect/want a war in Eastern Europe fairly soon, and still view the US as the world police.

Also, some understandably nervous Polish posters such as Marduk.
 
Ukraine has become a farce.

I don't mean the nation, I mean the situation.

It is obvious this is only a Geopolitical circlejerk between D.C. and Moscow. There is no real ideological drive or big question here. Russia wants to get back to being a Superpower and the USA won't let them. Ukraine is being caught in the crossfire because sadly the fact is they were Russian for the last 250 years and so they have a big target painted on their back.

But it has become near impossible to defend this behavior, because there is no legitimate claim on the Western side. When conflicts like this happen you need a narrative. Each side has one. Russia sees Ukraine as rightful land for them and claims the USA is prodding on their turf and they started it by meddling in Ukrainian politics in the first place. The first is highly debatable, the second is a fact but doesn't work as much towards Russia's favor outside of their own borders, but the last point about the USA interfering first is a complete diplomatic killshot. It's just the truth. They did. Color Revolutions were all the rage under Obama and look what a nice mess it turned out to be.

But what does the USA have to offer in narrative? Why should we care about Ukraine? "Democracy"? What democracy? People have become completely disillusioned after 20 years of foreign dick waving to "fight terrorists" and "support moderate rebels". We have seen how this shit ends with Syria and Libya and Egypt and their "peaceful revolutions" in the 2010s. Patriotism? The government is actively talking down to people who are patriotic, they are replacing the fundamental american values with equity and diversity and no one wants that. The people who actually would volunteer to go out and fight have no reason to do so.

No one wants to die for Kiev outside of Ukraine, and even then it seems there is a fraction of Ukranians who don't want to do so either. This is a complete farce of a proxy conflict, and I am sad to say Putin has played his cards expertly here. The maggots in D.C. are living in a complete bubble, convinced the world hasn't really changed since 2002 other than phones being a bit more modern and the TVs now being flat instead of CRTs. They fully think they can just direct the media to whip up a "WMDs production facility" or a "They went into the maternity ward and began shutting off the incubators for the babies" and have a few divisions ready to do some Shock and Awe, America Fuck Yeah to balance the budgets with new influx of cash and feel good. It's not.

This is fucking Russia. I don't care about the cope "muh outdated Soviet shit" and "lel Italy has a bigger GDP". That's missing the point. They are literally next to the battle, can prepare and do a invasion in a few days and be done, and if the west tries and do anything they can and WILL rely on the Nuclear Deterent. Putin knows this. Fucker is ex-KGB. His entire strategy as the Russian leader since he came into power in the 2000's has been one quite different from pretty much the entire of Russia history. He doesn't do long term, he doesn't really do large scale, he is extremely cautious about spending Russian lives in military adventures (especially in the context of Russia). He took his KGB training and applied it in full on his new Russian Federation. He plans, waits, calculates, and then delivers a single powerful surgical strike. The 2014 Donbass/Crimea thing was exactly this. There were a few months preparation, manouvers, geopolitic plays, and then once day "unmarked soldiers" crossed over and the Crimea "seceded" and then voted and voila, Russian. Done.

Obama couldn't really do anything. The west couldn't really do anything. There were talks and sanctions and blusters, but in the end Russia got away mostly scoot free. Maybe Obama and his cronies could have turned it into a proxy war, but do you think they would have managed to stop it? I don't. It wouldn't be worth it. By the time troops could get to Crimea it would have been far too late to make it really possible to drive the "unmarked soldiers" back and too dangerous.

And this was 2014. Unity was still super high. People still mostly believed shit. Compare that to today. Do you really see people rallying around this shit? After Afghanistan?

I feel sorry for Ukraine if anything. The West failed them by rotting from inside out.
 
This is from an exchange I had with a Hardcore Biden supporter.

Highlighted reply
Robert Nobles
13 minutes ago (edited)
@Sailor.X I am liking Biden’s victory over Trump. Bare shelves were a problem under Trump, yet I didn’t blame him. Gas prices are set by global supply and demand and I was car free until last year and barely drive my hybrid now. Good riddance to people who won’t get vaccinated. I picked Biden and he won. He got us out of Afghanistan like so many before promised and never did. I got a raise this month and a promotion, so I personally have more money in my pocket. Entry level workers are also getting more pay if you haven’t heard. Stock market and 401k through the roof. Plenty of money in peoples pockets. So other than COVID and things outside of Biden’s control things are doing well considering. Thanks for inquiring!
Show less






REPLY

You can't help these people you can only pity their stupidity
Operation Doublethink seems to be a complete success.

Tom Hanks to the rescue!



SIMPSONS DID IT! SIMPSONS DID IT!


This is going to ruin what rep he has.

And, oh look. The Democrats might be setting up their narrative for the 2022 midterms:

How many zombies are they conscripting this time?

Okay.
Why should we just let soveirgn countries be invaded and taken over?
Not a single person has ever explained to me about this
Hmmm . . . Let's see what good the US World Police has done for the world in the last 20 years?

Afghanistan. Killed some people, dropped some bombs, got some soldiers killed, wasted a shit load of taxpayer dollars. For what? For everything to go back to step one, with the Taliban back in charge and as bloodthirsty as ever.

Syria. Gave a bunch of military gear to rebels that promptly joined ISIS, weakened the legitimate government and hindered them from defeating ISIS, probably killed some civilians here and there, wasted a shit load of taxpayer dollars, caused a massive refugee crisis that is still affecting Europe. For what? For Syria to be a endless cesspit of misery and suffering.

Libya. Bombed the shit out of a legitimate government, let Libya's entire arsenal of weapons enter the black market, got a few US government personnel and contractors killed in a botched rescue mission. For what? For Libya, one of the most stable and prosperous countries in Africa to be turned into a dystopian conflict stricken hellhole where the slave trade of all things has reemerged.

Iraq. Overthrew a legitimate government after decisively defeating it in a massive war, went looking for WMDs but found some toilet factories instead (the Iraqi Shitflinger 5000 made Powell, Cheney, and Bush void their bowels in fear), destabilized one of the only countries capable of keeping Iran (a genuine threat) under control. For what? For oil barons to get their 15% increase in profits for 15 years, for the military industrial complex to make trillions of dollars, for the right to be deceived into becoming attack dogs for the global Cabal.

Canada participated in all of these shameful actions, much to my disgust.

I say we sit this one out and let the Russians and the Ukrainians duke it out.

Unless you truly believe that little Miss PFC with 2 moms is capable of defeating Ivan the Bear Wrestler in his own backyard?

Edit: Somewhat ninja'd by @Sobek
 
I'm happy to sell arms to the Ukraine as a friendly neutral, I'm not happy to send troops. Volunteers can volunteer if the Ukraine wants to raise a brigade of internationals.
 
You covered the failures of foerign policy a bit better while I took care of Ukraine debacle more @Droideka MK.II so it kinda get's even.

The fact is people are not up to be world police. Every time they try it ends in tears, failure and shame. For the people that is, the government just washes their hands off of it and keeps going.

Nah, not this time.

Like I said, I feel bad for Ukraine. They might actually have needed the World Police to help them, but sadly this buy cried wolf too many times. People have been burned. The sheep will really be killed this time and he can blame no one but himself.

I'm happy to sell arms to the Ukraine as a friendly neutral, I'm not happy to send troops. Volunteers can volunteer if the Ukraine wants to raise a brigade of internationals.

I think most people would, but the fact is this isn't actually about protecting Ukraine, but protecting a Sphere of Influence. Poor bastards.
 
So in essence you see any geopolitical rival as a threat to our existence, to be broken or destroyed as soon as possible?

I just want to make sure I am not putting words in your mouth, if I am misunderstanding your position.
If we want to sell weapons to Ukraine, that's one thing, and doesn't ruffle my feathers too much.

Putting uniformed US forces on the ground in expectation of getting into a shooting war with Russia is a whole other matter.

However certain warhawk factions in the US military industrial complex and DC would really like to get into a 'justified' shooting war to prove how big and strong the US military is.


I'm trying to explain why the adminstration is doing this not say weather or not its a good idea or not.

That said Russia was an existential threat to america's existence for generations they were the Carthrage to our Rome. Letting them get back to great power status is not something the boomers will allow.
 
Again, I ask, who is asking us to get into a shooting war with Russia over Ukraine? And I’m not talking about Zachowon here on Sietch., show me someone in the Pentagon, Joint Chiefs, US state Department, potus administration, etc who wants to send troops into the Ukraine to fight the Russians and actual quotes saying that is their intent.

Otherwise, you are all wasting time and energy tying yourselves into endless knots and beating your chests with conspiracy theories over something that isnt going to happen in regards to a us troop deployment. Most likely scenario if Putin invades, the Ukrainians put up a fight, and Putin most likely takes Kiev. The most the west and the US will do other than supplying weapons to the Ukrainians is slapping more sanctions on the Russians and that’s it. What people like Marduk is rightfully worried about is when Putin starts setting his sights on the Baltic states, and the Polish border.
 
I'm trying to explain why the adminstration is doing this not say weather or not its a good idea or not.

That said Russia was an existential threat to america's existence for generations they were the Carthrage to our Rome. Letting them get back to great power status is not something the boomers will allow.
We are not Rome, and should not seek to emulate Rome in anything but architecture.

This view of America as the 'new Rome' is unhealthy, and creates flawed assumptions about how the US should act
 
We are not Rome, and should not seek to emulate Rome in anything but architecture.

This view of America as the 'new Rome' is unhealthy, and creates flawed assumptions about how the US should act

To be fair I don’t think Cherico was implying that the US is Rome, or is trying to emulate Rome. Rather he was just trying to draw a parallel allegory, especially with realpolitik. YMMV of course.
 
To be fair I don’t think Cherico was implying that the US is Rome, or is trying to emulate Rome. Rather he was just trying to draw a parallel allegory, especially with realpolitik. YMMV of course.
I seen him say we are the new Rome, or should act as if we are, and it's something I've seen in a lot of the verbage of people who view the US as an empire in all but name.

Its a disturbing trend, as it creates a lot of flawed assumptions about what course of action our nation should persue, and how we should handle foreign and domestic relations/issues.
 
Send in the Sarmatians. Tell them they'll get one dogecoin for every hundred Russian heads they bring us. Men and Women. Children are half credit.

Don't tell them we don't have a reliable methodology of telling which heads are actually those of Russian citizens or not though. Learned that mistake already.
 
Perhaps it’s just my personal perception? But the only ones I’m seeing screaming the most about “what if the US sends troops to the Ukraine”, “what if there’s a nuclear war over the Ukraine” ad nauseum, are the ones claiming to oppose such ventures. Greenwald, Tucker, Gabbard, etc. Maybe I’m wrong, but for all this talk about the warhawks claiming to want a war over the Ukraine, I dont see the Pentagon issuing any WARNORDs to expect troop mobilizations, or massive shipments of heavy armor and artillery into the Ukraine from the West, with of course the exception of heavy weapons like ATGMS for the Ukrainian forces. Also, I don’t see any calls by the administration or Pentagon for the US to send armed forces into Ukraine.

Again, my perception, but it seems whenever Putin makes noise, certain actors automatically start bending over backwards to be Putin apologists and cry over how “aggressive” NATO and the West is being.
We are waiting for those WARNOs because me and some guys I know in other NATO armies are thinking some members of a NATO force are going to die in the invasion, and that is gonna bring us in.
POLAND is the main issue everyone is worried, because they are in direct path of the Russians after Ukraine. "B-but they fall under NATO!"
So? What is gonna stop the US fromnot getting invovled again? NATO? Biden has basically shown he doesnt care for our allies.
Ukraine has become a farce.

I don't mean the nation, I mean the situation.

It is obvious this is only a Geopolitical circlejerk between D.C. and Moscow. There is no real ideological drive or big question here. Russia wants to get back to being a Superpower and the USA won't let them. Ukraine is being caught in the crossfire because sadly the fact is they were Russian for the last 250 years and so they have a big target painted on their back.

But it has become near impossible to defend this behavior, because there is no legitimate claim on the Western side. When conflicts like this happen you need a narrative. Each side has one. Russia sees Ukraine as rightful land for them and claims the USA is prodding on their turf and they started it by meddling in Ukrainian politics in the first place. The first is highly debatable, the second is a fact but doesn't work as much towards Russia's favor outside of their own borders, but the last point about the USA interfering first is a complete diplomatic killshot. It's just the truth. They did. Color Revolutions were all the rage under Obama and look what a nice mess it turned out to be.

But what does the USA have to offer in narrative? Why should we care about Ukraine? "Democracy"? What democracy? People have become completely disillusioned after 20 years of foreign dick waving to "fight terrorists" and "support moderate rebels". We have seen how this shit ends with Syria and Libya and Egypt and their "peaceful revolutions" in the 2010s. Patriotism? The government is actively talking down to people who are patriotic, they are replacing the fundamental american values with equity and diversity and no one wants that. The people who actually would volunteer to go out and fight have no reason to do so.

No one wants to die for Kiev outside of Ukraine, and even then it seems there is a fraction of Ukranians who don't want to do so either. This is a complete farce of a proxy conflict, and I am sad to say Putin has played his cards expertly here. The maggots in D.C. are living in a complete bubble, convinced the world hasn't really changed since 2002 other than phones being a bit more modern and the TVs now being flat instead of CRTs. They fully think they can just direct the media to whip up a "WMDs production facility" or a "They went into the maternity ward and began shutting off the incubators for the babies" and have a few divisions ready to do some Shock and Awe, America Fuck Yeah to balance the budgets with new influx of cash and feel good. It's not.

This is fucking Russia. I don't care about the cope "muh outdated Soviet shit" and "lel Italy has a bigger GDP". That's missing the point. They are literally next to the battle, can prepare and do a invasion in a few days and be done, and if the west tries and do anything they can and WILL rely on the Nuclear Deterent. Putin knows this. Fucker is ex-KGB. His entire strategy as the Russian leader since he came into power in the 2000's has been one quite different from pretty much the entire of Russia history. He doesn't do long term, he doesn't really do large scale, he is extremely cautious about spending Russian lives in military adventures (especially in the context of Russia). He took his KGB training and applied it in full on his new Russian Federation. He plans, waits, calculates, and then delivers a single powerful surgical strike. The 2014 Donbass/Crimea thing was exactly this. There were a few months preparation, manouvers, geopolitic plays, and then once day "unmarked soldiers" crossed over and the Crimea "seceded" and then voted and voila, Russian. Done.

Obama couldn't really do anything. The west couldn't really do anything. There were talks and sanctions and blusters, but in the end Russia got away mostly scoot free. Maybe Obama and his cronies could have turned it into a proxy war, but do you think they would have managed to stop it? I don't. It wouldn't be worth it. By the time troops could get to Crimea it would have been far too late to make it really possible to drive the "unmarked soldiers" back and too dangerous.

And this was 2014. Unity was still super high. People still mostly believed shit. Compare that to today. Do you really see people rallying around this shit? After Afghanistan?

I feel sorry for Ukraine if anything. The West failed them by rotting from inside out.
You do know majority of the Ukrainians are willing to die against the Russians because when they were Russian puppet states, they lived worse?
and the coup of 2014 was more then just the US. It was the country not wanting to be apart of Russia.


But again. THe thing is, RUSSIA HAS NO CLAIM TO UKRAINE! If anythingPoland has more claim then Russia. SO why not give it to Poland?

All I see in here is "America is the bad guy because we arnt letting Russia invade a soverign nation they once had control over before they got ousted by a coup that the Russians blame on America."
The Russians will always claim America started it, that NATO started it.
But idk.
Maybe we will get deployed, maybe we will just sell arms. Just know that if the US and NATO do not stop Russia, they WILL do what ever they can to get the baltic states to leave NATO and then "Take back thier land".

If you dont beilive me, then you are ignorant and to in the mind of "LET THEM FIGHT FOR THEMSELVES!" Guess every country should be invaded by Russia then. Only makes sense since they cant defend, and they could have claims as having a large ethnic russian population.
Hell, if Ethnic population is a reaosn for invasion, we are on the list ourselves as Americans.....


Also, what makes Ukraine diffrent from Taiwan?

Also, nukes will not be fired if troops are in Ukraine. Russia isnt stupid enough because their docrtine is for homeland defense. They know nuking in Ukraine is a deathsentence. They are not going to do that. One also needs to know that nukes are also not an end all be all espeically if air burst
 
Last edited:
If the US was charging nations like Ukraine for bailing them out of shit like this then it might actually be worth it. The way I see it is if we are not getting plunder or land then there is absolutely no reason to go to war.
 
Last edited:
If you US was charging nations like Ukraine for bailing them out of shit like this then it might actually be worth it. The way I see it is if we are not getting plunder or land then there is absolutely no reason to go to war.
Just have them pay us back for the money we spent.
It wouldnt just be us fighting either.

And this isnt ancient times. We are not invaders. We do not plunder or take. We protect so they can build thier forces. MAYBE this will teach Ukraine to build up thier military and jump into joining NATO.
 
I never said Ukranians won't fight for Ukraine. Most will. I am saying most NATO people won't.
 
And this isnt ancient times. We are not invaders. We do not plunder or take.
Then "we" aren't befitting from the wars so we have no motive to fight. Maybe if all the countries whose sole defensive foreign policy appears to be "fight to the last American" spent their entire defense budgets on paying average American plebeians in exchange for said plebeians voting for interventionist politics to keep their gravy train running, it could work, but as now, the average American plebeian does not benefit from such wars.
 
Then "we" aren't befitting from the wars so we have no motive to fight. Maybe if all the countries whose sole defensive foreign policy appears to be "fight to the last American" spent their entire defense budgets on paying average American plebeians in exchange for said plebeians voting for interventionist politics to keep their gravy train running, it could work, but as now, the average American plebeian does not benefit from such wars.
Every country would basically just might as well be annexed by a country that has the ability to have a large standing army
I never said Ukranians won't fight for Ukraine. Most will. I am saying most NATO people won't.
But why should we let them basically be genocided
 
Every country would basically just might as well be annexed by a country that has the ability to have a large standing army nuclear deterrent
fixed
ENYc9B8W4AAFSu4.jpg

But why should we let them basically be genocided
Better they die than, at a minimum, our soldiers, at a maximum, the entirety of civilization, dies to save them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top