Floridaman
Well-known member
The thing is the US isn’t quite as good at it, the best run one was Afghanistan, and we all remember how that one turned out.No no. I mean the US may continue a proxy conflict with the Russians.
The thing is the US isn’t quite as good at it, the best run one was Afghanistan, and we all remember how that one turned out.No no. I mean the US may continue a proxy conflict with the Russians.
Hasn't stopped them from trying.The thing is the US isn’t quite as good at it, the best run one was Afghanistan, and we all remember how that one turned out.
I am leaving here in a couple months and going to a unit that deploys a lotCalm down you are in a potential conflict area already I somehow doubt you would be shifted to another.
I thought you were in intelligence, why would you be sent into active conflict?I am leaving here in a couple months and going to a unit that deploys a lot
Being at the base doesn't mean attacks can't happen in combat areas. Indeed when actually facing an opposing nation with decent capabilities they're fixed targetsI thought you were in intelligence, why would you be sent into active conflict?
I can be at a base and still be attacked. Just not get hitI thought you were in intelligence, why would you be sent into active conflict?
Even in areas with not so great enemy I can still be attacked.Being at the base doesn't mean attacks can't happen in combat areas. Indeed when actually facing an opposing nation with decent capabilities they're fixed targets
I don't want to go to th middle east! Fuckimg hell
........You're going to liberate Dubai bar girls of Southeast Asian extraction of their underpants.
They'll just go well Drumpf altered the deal yada yada."B-But Obama and the UN said they were obeying it! Why are they doing what Trump said they would!!!"
I tell everyone Iran is next.
Edit: Well China and Iran
I actually don't oppose Iran having nuclear weapons, since I think it is only fair that they have the ability to defend themselves against hostile powers. The problem for me is if they will be responsible with the technology or not.
Countries like the Norks are out since they are dangerous and unstable.
Given that the Iranians don't want to eat a hundred or so warheads at the minimum if they hit either of those nations I do not think this is likely. Mind you I don't trust Iran as is and them having nukes seems like a recipe for disaster if for nothing else it forcing the Saudis and Eygptians into starting serious nuclear programI would be surprised if it's more than months between Iran getting a nuke and either Israel, the US, or both, sprouting mushroom clouds. If they do, it's probably WWIII.
Given that the Iranians don't want to eat a hundred or so warheads at the minimum if they hit either of those nations I do not think this is likely.
Oh everyone will know.You're assuming that they'll launch ballistic missiles with a nuclear warhead rather than quietly slip a briefcase nuke to a covert Hizballah operative, then deny all involvement.
Oh everyone will know.