Musk actually buys Twitter.

Terthna

Professional Lurker
People deserve to know that you were one of the Trans activists who was really nasty to them in the past, and that you've now got power on a website that you could potentially exploit if you wanted to give them trouble.
It's kind of superfluous though, considering that all you really need to figure out what sort of person they are is to read a handful of their posts. Although I'm unclear as to what power they supposedly have here, beyond benefiting from a desire amongst the staff to make a clean break from Spacebattles, that lingers from the previous owner's administration.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
It's kind of superfluous though, considering that all you really need to figure out what sort of person they are is to read a handful of their posts. Although I'm unclear as to what power they supposedly have here, beyond benefiting from a desire amongst the staff to make a clean break from Spacebattles, that lingers from the previous owner's administration.
Admin access, not sure how much server access, is a lot of power.
@ShadowArxxy is running the @SietchTechOps account
 

LordSunhawk

Das BOOT (literally)
Owner
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
And your point is, @Rocinante? @ShadowArxxy is a close personal friend of mine who has earned my trust, and when I requested that they serve as my IT person they accepted. Considering that they've had all this supposed power for *over two years* and not ONCE have they abused it in even the most trivial way? I think my trust was superbly placed in this case.

So you don't like her, boo hoo. Derailing this thread to whinge about staff, when there's already a thread for that, is ridiculous. Continue this derail at your own peril.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
And your point is, @Rocinante? @ShadowArxxy is a close personal friend of mine who has earned my trust, and when I requested that they serve as my IT person they accepted. Considering that they've had all this supposed power for *over two years* and not ONCE have they abused it in even the most trivial way? I think my trust was superbly placed in this case.

So you don't like her, boo hoo. Derailing this thread to whinge about staff, when there's already a thread for that, is ridiculous. Continue this derail at your own peril.
I wasn't the one who brought up the "doxxing," shadow did. I responded with why it was different, and shadow's past with the community is part of it, because you made up a new "soft doxing" rule to protect shadows identity.

Maybe it derailed a bit after that. I'll drop it.
 

Free-Stater 101

Freedom Means Freedom!!!
Nuke Mod
Moderator
Staff Member
I wasn't the one who brought up the "doxxing," shadow did. I responded with why it was different, and shadow's past with the community is part of it, because you made up a new "soft doxing" rule to protect shadows identity.

Maybe it derailed a bit after that. I'll drop it.
Please do. And for the record while Shadow is a staff member she is barred from any decision making regarding bans or infractions, I can testify that the only thing she does is pretty much talk about Fandom things in staff discord and random odds and ends concerning site updates and software when instructed by Sunhawk.

I just feel the need to bring that up because your entire narrative here is faulty as far as I can tell concerning corruption. I know you guys have had bad blood in the past but Shadow to my knowledge has never bought it up or made it an issue.

If I felt Shadow was targeting you or anybody else you would have been told by me after I resigned as I am strongly against the targeting of unliked individuals by staff members that's the reason I seculde myself from discussing the infractions of individuals I strongly dislike.

Sorry if this is out of the blue but I want it nipped in the bud, if you have any further concerns about it we have Sietch Affairs for a reason.
 
Last edited:

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
I really do not know what he is playing at, to be honest. He knows exactly who he's dealing with so why would he telegraph weakness like that?

Edit: what's worse is that he had twitter under his complete control, and now for some reason he has offerred the enemy an avenue of attack.

I don't think he has an End game, he's an aspie from Soof Efrikan trailer trash roots. One that has repeatedly been cucked by his former spouses and battered and easily duped by them.

He's probably just deflating.

Musk was never a savior, he was just a fun way to break things.
 

liberty90

Evil Neoliberal Cat


FkSiCJJVQAAqqYV


It looks like Kushner and Saudi investors told Musk that he had enough fun with Twatter and it's time for matters to settle down.


Possibly they showed displeasure, but the more important thing IMHO was frankly stupid - from all ideological perspectives - decision to prohibit links to all other social media sites, from facebook and instagram to mastodon and truth social. A few old friends of Musk from the Silicon Valley were briefly banned, lol. The decision is already reversed, but the damage among Musk supporters/fans was done.

You can explode twenty (unmanned) rockets to better figure out the best design, but trying to do the similar thing with social network (radical changes then trying something else next day) is very destabilizing and PR-disaster even among supporters, at least that situation IMO was.
 
Last edited:

edgeworthy

Well-known member
Pro-gun, pro-nuclear power, and pro-draft is "the left-wing position in every single discussion?" Curious.
I believe you are experiencing the "Everything I don't like/ disagree with/ contradicts or mildly upsets me is left-wing/ liberal/ socialism etc" principle?

Run into it a few times myself.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
I believe you are experiencing the "Everything I don't like/ disagree with/ contradicts or mildly upsets me is left-wing/ liberal/ socialism etc" principle?

Run into it a few times myself.

In my case it's more because I'm known to generally be one of the minority of liberals on this forum, so certain members basically replace what I actually say with "liberal strawman of the day", and/or assume anything I say that isn't "liberal strawman" is some sort of bad faith sneakyness.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
In my case it's more because I'm known to generally be one of the minority of liberals on this forum, so certain members basically replace what I actually say with "liberal strawman of the day", and/or assume anything I say that isn't "liberal strawman" is some sort of bad faith sneakyness.
It could have to do with hour 15+ year reputation of doing basically just that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top