You speak about tactics, I speak about strategy.
As Sun Tzu said 'If you defend everything, you defend nothing.'; that holds true for politics and social capital as much as military campaigns and planning.
Defending the CSA is defending an abandoned septic tank while your capital and ports are about to be sacked.
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
My main criticism of you, to use Sun Tzus framing, is that you know neither your yourself/your allies), nor your enemies. Even worse, you are not simply ignorant of both, but deeply believe you know a great deal about both, which are both simply not true.
On this game we are playing, you have a false sense of what the state of the board is, who the players are, a fabricated history of how the board reached its current status, and how this game actually works.
Thus, your suggestions come across as either insane, grounded in complete ignorance, or actively sabotaging of the cause.
That is my criticism of you in this discussion we've been having. Your applying faulty logic to a poor understanding of how things are.
You say Republicans should be pro environment? They are. They literally created the Environmental Protection Agency. Republicans are deeply involved in many conservation groups. They're not communists however, so it doesn't matter.
You say Republicans should be pro black and anti confederacy? They are. Republicans bend over backwards to try and appeal to blacks, voted in the civil rights acts over democratic opposition, actively purge anyone with the smallest hint of pro white sympathy, up to voting in a democrat rather than a racist when one won a primary. Their not communists however, so it doesn't matter.
To those of us who have been in this a while, what your saying seems to amount to "If only the Republicans were still lead by George Bush, Nixon, and McCain, everything would be great".
Your arguing that Republicans do what they have done for at least 50 years and follow in the Rommey/McCain tradition. Because that worked out so well.