Imagine needing a piece of wood to get off.You missed the reference. The male would stare at the piece of wood while letting miss lefty palms do it's work.
This message is brought to you by the PCG (Player Character Gang)
Imagine needing a piece of wood to get off.You missed the reference. The male would stare at the piece of wood while letting miss lefty palms do it's work.
It happened again:It gets better, these are some of the chyrons that CNN used to talk about it:
snip
Other examples of angry CNN chyrons were shown on Fox News by Tucker Carlson, which Trump reposted the clip of:
snip
Imagine being so butthurt you start ranting in the chyrons.
And in something that leaves me wishing I was still poking fun at CNN's Chyron guy going mad we instead have CNN printing literal CCP propaganda as an article before promptly quietly editing it when people called them out on it:
Archive of dailycaller article.Following Backlash, CNN Scrambles To Stealth Edit Article Repeating Chinese PLA Propaganda
CNN scrambled to quietly edit an article repeating Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) propaganda Wednesday morning following backlash.dailycaller.com
Archive of CNN Article.
I'm not sure what's more impressive, how much they plagiarized from the press release with minimal changes or how little thought they put into whether or not they should be printing said article.
CNN like a lot of news operations utterally gutted their international branches to save on money, and while they did save money it leaves them completely and utterly blind when it comes to international events.
And those that aren't are just something some "journalist" saw posted on Twitter, or Reddit, and didn't bother to fact-check.The majority of international news reports, in almost every news company(whether TV or newspaper) are copy-pasted reports from one of four news agencies: AP, Reuters, France-Presse and Xinhua.
Bloomberg actually has a decent amount of international news reporting.The majority of international news reports, in almost every news company(whether TV or newspaper) are copy-pasted reports from one of four news agencies: AP, Reuters, France-Presse and Xinhua.
I was once told Al Jazeera is not unbiased when it comes to anything, and everything they push out pushes the Qatar agenda, and that pushes all these others Agendas.Bloomberg actually has a decent amount of international news reporting.
Al Jazeera is also pretty good for anything that doesn't touch on an issue Qatar (its owner) cares about.
Sounds pretty bad, right? Shilling for the War in Afghanistan, shilling for the patriot act (aggressive prevention), implying with mention of "chemical or biological weapons" that the risk of WMDs was great enough to justify invading Iraq, praising Obama's use of drone strikes, mentioning the economic damage of 9/11 and not that the ensuing war cost twice as much, and saying that on the whole the effort was a success. Doubtlessly the woke resistors will reject such illogical praising of the things their parents told them were bad and should be opposed 15 years ago, especially when they're written by one of Dubya's speech writers. Can you imagine them choosing one of the men who voted for the Iraq war?Ideology does not provide protection from this syndrome. It is the same type of reasoning that declares the war against terrorism to be an overreaction to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. On that day, terrorist operations costing $500,000 killed nearly 3,000 people and resulted in an estimated $3.3 trillion in economic damage. An attack with chemical or biological weapons could have multiplied these results. Under President George W. Bush, the United States undertook a global campaign against terrorist networks and financing that was costly but, on the whole, successful. The effort was continued by President Barack Obama — employing different terminology and more drone strikes — with continued effect. Yet some insist that a lack of attacks on the American homeland proves the aggressive prevention of those attacks unnecessary.
Great to see quality media is on top of the really important issues.