Terthna
Professional Lurker
Thing is, once we cross that line, we have no idea what's going to happen. Civil conflict on that scale is like a runaway train; you can't just pump the breaks once the destination is reached. Your best hope is that it runs out of fuel and rolls to a stop before it hits something it can't just plough through. Sadly, the regressive left is not only aware of this, but they're banking on everyone else believing that the potential cost of such a conflict is too high to justify fighting back.I mean, I’m pretty much at the point where I can say Pinochet did nothing wrong and we need to start handing out parachute free skydiving lessons to leftists and still be pretty comfortable with myself...So the article isn’t necessarily wrong if they’re talking about the fringe right.
If they’re talking about the gentlemanly losers and right leaning centrists, not so much.
Someone I know, I’m not going to get into specifics, is basically the poster boy for milquetoast, small government conservatism, and they get insanely uncomfortable and judgmental anytime I start talking about taking the fight to the liberals if they steal the election.
They recognize what the democrats are doing is wrong, but they refuse to draw a line in the sand where fighting them to preserve the nation becomes acceptable.
It’s the classic modern conservatism that I absolutely loathe. No sin so great, no crime so loathsome, that it would justify even contemplating taking the fight to the streets.
It’s this type of polite, turn the other cheek and ask for another punch that makes me contemptuous of modern conservatism.
They're essentially playing chicken, and expecting their enemies to blink every single time. This tactic is unsustainable, and basically lays the groundwork for those who see crashing into their opponent, and not avoiding them at the last moment, as the ultimate goal of the contest to seize power.