Daily Mail said:A transgender underwear designer has been accused of child abuse for selling pants that seek to ‘flatten’ the genitals of boys as young as four.
Doctors warned that the underwear, which is made to ‘flatten the side profile of the pelvic area’, could cause infertility.
A leading peer claimed the sale of the product amounted to a criminal offence.
The garments are sold by Carmen Liu, an eponymous company established by a transgender former ballet dancer that describes itself as ‘the UK’s first brand to design flattening and tucking underwear’.
Look at the complete "this is good actually bigot" responses from groomers in the replies
This has followed the left's playbook perfectly.
"It's not happening
No really It's not happening
We told you conspiracy theorists It's not happening
Okay it's is happening, and it's good"
Look at the complete "this is good actually bigot" responses from groomers in the replies
No. What is banned is class instruction, that is to say, you can't have "Gender and You" on the curriculum, if it's "Parents Show Up Day" and Little Jenny has two Dads, the teacher can say "some kids have two dads and that's fine" and can even explain a bit about why. Now, your actual example is rendered rather moot by the fact that Florida's issued new guidelines basically saying "If they are under 18 the evidence is the risk of harm from trans treatments is unacceptably higher than the potential benefits, so don't". If it happens anyway, the Teacher is entirely in their rights to punish harassment as per normal and say things like "it's fine to be more comfortable wearing something else".Now, as to child grooming, there is one exception to the child grooming bill I'll actually listen too, and it's a good point. What happens when the woke parent brings there 'trans' kid to school, and the kids ask the teacher "What's up with George? Why's he wearing a dress?" That would, in a normal world, be a fine time for the teacher to quickly, dispassionately, explain what's up with George then move on. But in Florida, the teacher can't say anything,
Class instruction wasn't defined. That's one of the actually relevant issues with the law: it's vague. It's quite possible the two dad thing to a young enough kid might cross the technical legal line. Of course, a decent DA isn't going to sue over that, but some DA's want a political case no matter the facts. The problem is that the law is vague, not the law itself.No. What is banned is class instruction, that is to say, you can't have "Gender and You" on the curriculum, if it's "Parents Show Up Day" and Little Jenny has two Dads, the teacher can say "some kids have two dads and that's fine" and can even explain a bit about why. Now, your actual example is rendered rather moot by the fact that Florida's issued new guidelines basically saying "If they are under 18 the evidence is the risk of harm from trans treatments is unacceptably higher than the potential benefits, so don't". If it happens anyway, the Teacher is entirely in their rights to punish harassment as per normal and say things like "it's fine to be more comfortable wearing something else".
It's actually not vague, a number of those "vague terms" are "set to be defined later and otherwise don't apply". Basically, for all the hubbub about the law, there's very little in it that is actually currently enforceable. Most of it is waiting for other laws to define things like "according to state policy".Class instruction wasn't defined. That's one of the actually relevant issues with the law: it's vague.