Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Thread

Maybe. The concept sounds good, but lots of things sound good in concept. The issue is the precise mechanism employed:



I don't know how you would break down evidence by percentages like this. Usually, when people say something like "I'm 90% sure he's guilty", there's nothing actually backing that number up, it's just a figure of speech.

How would you decide that "most" of the evidence doesn't serve to disprove self defense, what is evidence? A single witness? A single statement by that witness? What if there's a video, and then a slowed down or enhanced version of that video, is that one piece of evidence or two, or is it more than that?
That's a fair question.

I'd say that the exact mechanism does need work, but the idea is sound, and could be applied to a larger selection of cases, besides just self-defense cases.

If that question, or something like it, was added to jury instructions in general, that might cut down on malicious/political prosecutions.
 
I just want to address your "crossing state line" bit.

It's utterly meaningless. It was only used as an attack against him. You should not parrot that line. It's a half-hour drive from his home town to Kenosha, where he held a job and his dad resides.
The Leftoids hate any kind of borders except when they can use them to bludgeon upstanding citizens with them. Fuck their hypocrisy.
 
Gage is insanely luckily he didn't get charged with attempted murder, because unlike Kyle, he'd have a very hard time making a self defense claim, even if he did believe Kyle shot Rosenbaum on purpose, that does not give Gage a valid claim of self defense against Kyle.
Speaking of, there really ought to be a push for Gage to get prosecuted.
 
How would you decide that "most" of the evidence doesn't serve to disprove self defense, what is evidence? A single witness? A single statement by that witness? What if there's a video, and then a slowed down or enhanced version of that video, is that one piece of evidence or two, or is it more than that?

"Preponderance of evidence" is basically that standard already.
 
SWNS_RITTENHOUSE_05JPG-JS694822005.jpg


Agent 47 protected kid's smile.
 
General update of AH for those interested: The reasonable people have come out and the seethe back at them is pretty intense. 'not guilty was the only call to make' 'Kyle isn't a hero or a victim, but he's also not a murderer' 'How is that not racist, I refuse to engage with you anymore' 'People's Lives>Property' 'Mass destruction of property cannot be equated to rape.' 'Racist vigilantism on the rise, I foresee' 'What if Kyle had been black?' 'The right would prop him up as the next candance owens/kayne' 'the cops would have shot him'

(I'm summarizing and scattershot on what's being mentioned. The people over there aren't that different than what's going on SB or SV, you can predict everything they're saying)
 
Last edited:
General update of AH for those interested: The reasonable people have come out and the seethe back at them is pretty intense. 'not guilty was the only call to make' 'Kyle isn't a hero or a victim, but he's also not a murderer' 'How is that not racist, I refuse to engage with you anymore' 'People's Lives>Property' 'Mass destruction of property cannot be equated to rape.' 'Racist vigilantism on the rise, I foresee' 'What if Kyle had been black?' 'The right would prop him up as the next candance owens/kayne' 'the cops would have shot him'

Isnt AH supposed to be an alternate history discussion forum, or am i wrong? If so, Why are they even discussing a current court case with political ramifications??
 
Isnt AH supposed to be an alternate history discussion forum, or am i wrong? If so, Why are they even discussing a current court case with political ramifications??

They also have a ASB/MagicHappened AH forum and a fanfiction forum that fall under their main 'Alternate History' heading. But they also have an 'off topic' section divided into political and non-political. Also there are alternate timelines of stuff that's happened within the past decade.

I, for one, am surprised that AH doesn't have AH questing.
 
General update of AH for those interested: The reasonable people have come out and the seethe back at them is pretty intense. 'not guilty was the only call to make' 'Kyle isn't a hero or a victim, but he's also not a murderer' 'How is that not racist, I refuse to engage with you anymore' 'People's Lives>Property' 'Mass destruction of property cannot be equated to rape.' 'Racist vigilantism on the rise, I foresee' 'What if Kyle had been black?' 'The right would prop him up as the next candance owens/kayne' 'the cops would have shot him'

(I'm summarizing and scattershot on what's being mentioned. The people over there aren't that different than what's going on SB or SV, you can predict everything they're saying)
Links and/or quotes for the inaccessible pages?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top