Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum

[TheRejectionist]

I want to take your argument seriously but it's very difficult when you put Foucalt there, one who, as far as I remember, perfectly encapsulate the term "pedo-enabler", because Michel Foucault argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations.

 

[LordsFire]

I want to take your argument seriously but it's very difficult when you put Foucalt there, one who, as far as I remember, perfectly encapsulate the term "pedo-enabler", because Michel Foucault argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations.

He was one of the founding post-modernists.

One of the vanguard of the modern nonsense, CRT, DEI, etc, is all based out of this school of thought, which was created by bitter and spiteful marxists once the truth about the Soviet Union got out, and they couldn't make 'factual' arguments in favor of socialism anymore.

 

[Iconoclast]

I want to take your argument seriously but it's very difficult when you put Foucalt there, one who, as far as I remember, perfectly encapsulate the term "pedo-enabler", because Michel Foucault argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations.

He was one of the founding post-modernists.

One of the vanguard of the modern nonsense, CRT, DEI, etc, is all based out of this school of thought, which was created by bitter and spiteful marxists once the truth about the Soviet Union got out, and they couldn't make 'factual' arguments in favor of socialism anymore.

Oh, trust me, I agree 100%. However, regardless of his other beliefs, the concept of biopolitics is still broadly applicable to what’s happening. We could just call it eugenics, though, because the whole concept of the ruling elite picking and choosing what sort of “human stock” they want is the central issue.

 

[Bassoe]

Agree.But alternatives which could be made by us are worst - muslims,China,or green gulag.

I think the point being made is, why should we consider alternatives worse? Name any horrible dystopian policy of the CCP and it's a safe bet some WEF wannabe bond villain is quite openly trying to implement their own version against us.

Why should I care about your propaganda of China wanting to turn their population into servitors when you want to do it to us through servitorization? Why should I care about the spooky Chinese Social Credit system when American oligarch Larry Ellison is building his own good old all-American version? Why should we care about their genociding the Uyghur Muslims through forced sterilizations while we genocide Palestinian Muslims through carpet-bombing and deliberately induced famine from logistics blockage? They don't get to elect their leaders? Statistically speaking, neither do we. And so forth and so on.

Nobody Fights for a World Economic Forum Flag

October 15, 2024 by J.B. Shurk

edwin797.substack.com

 

[Zachowon]

I think the point being made is, why should we consider alternatives worse? Name any horrible dystopian policy of the CCP and it's a safe bet some WEF wannabe bond villain is quite openly trying to implement their own version against us.

Why should I care about your propaganda of China wanting to turn their population into servitors when you want to do it to us through servitorization? Why should I care about the spooky Chinese Social Credit system when American oligarch Larry Ellison is building his own good old all-American version? Why should we care about their genociding the Uyghur Muslims through forced sterilizations while we genocide Palestinian Muslims through carpet-bombing and deliberately induced famine from logistics blockage? They don't get to elect their leaders? Statistically speaking, neither do we. And so forth and so on.

Nobody Fights for a World Economic Forum Flag

October 15, 2024 by J.B. Shurk

edwin797.substack.com

Except there is no genocide of Palestinian Muslims. If so why sre thier numbers INCREASING, not decreasing

 

[ATP]

I think the point being made is, why should we consider alternatives worse? Name any horrible dystopian policy of the CCP and it's a safe bet some WEF wannabe bond villain is quite openly trying to implement their own version against us.

Why should I care about your propaganda of China wanting to turn their population into servitors when you want to do it to us through servitorization? Why should I care about the spooky Chinese Social Credit system when American oligarch Larry Ellison is building his own good old all-American version? Why should we care about their genociding the Uyghur Muslims through forced sterilizations while we genocide Palestinian Muslims through carpet-bombing and deliberately induced famine from logistics blockage? They don't get to elect their leaders? Statistically speaking, neither do we. And so forth and so on.

Nobody Fights for a World Economic Forum Flag

October 15, 2024 by J.B. Shurk

edwin797.substack.com

You are both right and wrong.Right,becouse "our" elites made hell on Earth for us,if they win.
Wrong,becouse chineese ,real leftists,and at least some muslims would still be worst.

 

[DarthOne]

"Most people will be willing to give up their privacy in exchange for... 24 hour monitoring of what's happening inside their bodies."

WEF "agenda contributor" Yuval Noah Harari: "Very soon, people will walk around with biometric sensors—on, or even inside their bodies—and will allow Google, or Facebook, or the Chinese government, or whoever, to constantly monitor what's happening inside [their] body."

 

[Jormungandr]

Yeah, at this point if some nutter or Islamist blows up the WEF with them all in it, they'd be praised by most people than condemned, the globalist scum are that much hated.

 

[Iconoclast]

It's so much worse than what he's saying.

So. Much. Worse.

 

[Lord Sovereign]

(Sigh)

To be charitable, I'm sure he's thinking more "can keep a constant eye on the body for when things go wrong and to enhance the body" and less "I'm a comic book villain, lolololol." His lot get caught up in the theory of it all, and don't quite understand how technology can bring about dystopia instead of utopia.

It's why technocracy is a nightmare. It is a scientist's job to think, not to govern.

 

[DarthOne]

(Sigh)

To be charitable, I'm sure he's thinking more "can keep a constant eye on the body for when things go wrong and to enhance the body" and less "I'm a comic book villain, lolololol." His lot get caught up in the theory of it all, and don't quite understand how technology can bring about dystopia instead of utopia.

It's why technocracy is a nightmare. It is a scientist's job to think, not to govern.

I'm not so sure in the slightest.

 

[Vyor]

he very much is talking about the chronically ill.

 

[Typhonis]

he very much is talking about the chronically ill.

Uh huh and how soon will it go from 'the chronically ill' to 'everyone with a pulse'?

 

[Iconoclast]

(Sigh)

To be charitable, I'm sure he's thinking more "can keep a constant eye on the body for when things go wrong and to enhance the body" and less "I'm a comic book villain, lolololol." His lot get caught up in the theory of it all, and don't quite understand how technology can bring about dystopia instead of utopia.

It's why technocracy is a nightmare. It is a scientist's job to think, not to govern.

Of course he is. But this tech is dual-use. One man's nanomedicine is another man's perfect surveillance tool.

Uh huh and how soon will it go from 'the chronically ill' to 'everyone with a pulse'?

Pretty much immediately.

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Man these fucks are determined to make Deus Ex and Cyberpunk 2077 prophetic rather than works of fiction.

 

[Typhonis]

The Mark will be in the hand or the forehead.

 

[mrttao]

Man these fucks are determined to make Deus Ex and Cyberpunk 2077 prophetic rather than works of fiction.

Cyberpunk 2077 was not a work of fiction. it was social commentary about the inevitable end state of the current policies.

 

[Vyor]

Uh huh and how soon will it go from 'the chronically ill' to 'everyone with a pulse'?

He's a doctor, he's talking about real patents and real technology being worked on.

Did you know there are already blood glucose meters implanted in people? No? Well that's because you don't have diabetes.

Catastrophizing everything is retarded, stop doing it.

Of course he is. But this tech is dual-use. One man's nanomedicine is another man's perfect surveillance tool.

In the following year, according to Katherine Watt, the Congress repealed and replaced a 1977 public law that had — bizarrely — granted DoD permission to experiment on soldiers without their consent with a new law[19] that transferred authority through the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act[20] to the FDA. As Watt observes, while these two legislative manoeuvres were but a public pretense to simulate Congressional interest in protecting "military servicemen and women from forced submission to biological and chemical weapons experiments", what they really did was to transfer the weapons research and development to the Department of Health and Human Services.

This is a blatant and outright lie. And then later he pulls from this article which has this gem in it:

Information, of course, implies cyberthreats and information distortion or manipulation. And a connected brain, in particular a soldier's connected brain, will lead to offensive and defence forms of "cognitive warfare." Many writers have already imagined what threats might emerge. Most of them remain science-fiction, but some projects are benefiting from real resources, programmed and in some cases tested, using, for instance, neurocomputing implants and perception-augmenting technical hybrids (vision and hearing), or even genomic modifications.

The entire fucking thing is scifi. There is not a single neurocomputing implant and the only perception augmenting implants that exist are for blind and deaf people, they certainly don't improve vision or hearing for people who aren't those two things!

Or the paper 'Medical Micro/Nanorobots in Precision Medicine', which reviews a wide range of micro- and nanoscale robots and their uses in medical sensing, imaging, drug and DNA delivery, and surgical operations throughout the body's tissues and inside cells.[45] Indeed, searching the term nanorobot on Google Scholar yields some 19,000 results. Once again, these technologies, some of which, dubbed microdrillers, can perform actions including travelling at high speeds inside the body and penetrating tissue or deforming cells[46], have dual military potential as weapons, surveillance tools, genetic engineering devices, components of cyborg systems, and/or wireless human networks.

They have literally 0 use for that. Nanorobots can't even be complex enough to have a wifi signal, let alone network with other fucking systems in other people's bodies. And no, that broken citation isn't on my end: that's their problem.

Nanorobots are, effectively, artificial viruses. They go in, do the one thing they are built to do, and fall apart in doing it.

As an example of overlaps between medical and military technologies, the following illustration reinterprets the cover image on the November 2020 issue of the journal Advanced Science, titled Medical Robotics: Medical Micro/Nanorobots in Precision Medicine. The cover offers an artist's concept of a biohybrid / cyborg micro-organism receiving input from a tower to capture a coronavirus in the bloodstream. In keeping with Harari's earlier "prophecy" that surveillance would go "under the skin" with Covid-19, did the public get its first look at how surveillance might be operationalised one month after the journal's issue with the release of the injectable gene therapy in early December of 2020?

So which is it, schizo? Is it gene therapy or is it micro/nano bots? It can't be both!

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Cyberpunk 2077 was not a work of fiction. it was social commentary about the inevitable end state of the current policies.

Actually while that is sort of true that was really more of Deus Ex's hate. Least the original game anyways.

 

[TheRejectionist]

He's a doctor, he's talking about real patents and real technology being worked on.

Harari is a doctor of History and he is competent in that as much as I am competent with engineering with me being a doctor in foreign languages.

Did you know there are already blood glucose meters implanted in people? No? Well that's because you don't have diabetes.

Catastrophizing everything is retarded, stop doing it.

While you are optimising pro-establishment arguments and not very good at doing so.

This is a blatant and outright lie. And then later he pulls from this article which has this gem in it:


The entire fucking thing is scifi. There is not a single neurocomputing implant and the only perception augmenting implants that exist are for blind and deaf people, they certainly don't improve vision or hearing for people who aren't those two things!

So which is it, schizo? Is it gene therapy or is it micro/nano bots? It can't be both!

It can.