Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum

[Captain X]

Apparently the last video this guy made actually got noticed, and now the WEF-affiliated minister is calling for him to be sanctioned, even though all he did was repeat what they themselves said and had a negative opinion about it, basically.
He's also trying to gaslight the media about excavations have been halted, in spite of everything this guy said in his first video coming right from what had been reported in the media previously.

 

[ATP]

Apparently the last video this guy made actually got noticed, and now the WEF-affiliated minister is calling for him to be sanctioned, even though all he did was repeat what they themselves said and had a negative opinion about it, basically.
He's also trying to gaslight the media about excavations have been halted, in spite of everything this guy said in his first video coming right from what had been reported in the media previously.

Why they bother to hide anytching there? there was no hide alien base there,or human hybrids,so why?
I undarstandt hiding some important knowledge - but,there is no hidden knowledge there.

Well,maybe they are stupid enough to belive to be descendentd of shamans who lived there....

 

[Captain X]

Why they bother to hide anytching there? there was no hide alien base there,or human hybrids,so why?
I undarstandt hiding some important knowledge - but,there is no hidden knowledge there.

Well,maybe they are stupid enough to belive to be descendentd of shamans who lived there....

Because they want to hide our history from us.

 

[Terthna]

Because they want to hide our history from us.

Any part of if that they can't use to promote/glorify themselves and their insane ideology, at least.

 

[Bassoe]

There is no reasonable counter to this argument, at all, other than saying, perhaps, that the majority of human beings on this planet are simply unnecessary dead weight who don't deserve a wage because they're too low-IQ and useless to contribute in any meaningful way to a post-industrial society. Which, in short, is the WEF's exact message.

I don't think it's that exotic at all. What's exotic, to me, is the notion that governments ought to reserve the right to pluck people off the street and do what they wish with their bodies, like we're zoo animals in a cage. That's bizarre.

What degree of biopolitics is okay with you? Or, more to the point, to what degree do you think that citizens are a government's chattel property?

A military draft is, essentially, a declaration that a government has more right to your body than you do, and that you can be conscripted to do things you may not want to do in service of national goals and objectives.

I mean, they admit it. Here, have a war profiteer who just closed a deal selling AI to the US military intelligence community talking about how he expects war with China, Iran and Russia and supports conscription.

"Surely," said Mark, "one requires a pretty large population for the full exploitation of nature, if for nothing else? And surely war is disgenic and reduces efficiency? Even if population needs thinning, is not war the worst possible method of thinning it?"

"That idea is a survival from conditions which are rapidly being altered. A few centuries ago, war did operate in the way you describe. A large agricultural population was essential; and war destroyed types which were then still useful. But every advance in industry and agriculture reduces the number of work-people who are required. A large, unintelligent population is now becoming a dead-weight. The real importance of scientific war is that scientists have to be reserved. It was not the great technocrats of Koenigsberg or Moscow who supplied the casualties in the siege of Stalingrad: it was superstitious Bavarian peasants and low-grade Russian agricultural workers. The effect of modern war is to eliminate retrogressive types, while sparing the technocracy and increasing its hold upon public affairs. In the new age, what has hitherto been merely the intellectual nucleus of the race is to become, by gradual stages, the race itself. You are to conceive the species as an animal which has discovered how to simplify nutrition and locomotion to such a point that the old complex organs and the large body which contained them are no longer necessary. That large body is therefore to disappear. Only a tenth part of it will now be needed to support the brain. The individual is to become all head. The human race is to become all Technocracy."

If you go back to the middle of the 20th century, it doesn’t matter if you’re with Roosevelt in the United States, or in Germany with Hitler, or in the USSR with Stalin. [When] you think about building the future, then you’re building materials are those millions of people who are working hard in the factories, in the farms, the soldiers… you need them. You don’t have any kind of future without them.

And now, fast forward to the early 21st century when we just don’t need the vast majority of the population [...] because the future is about developing more and more sophisticated technology, like artificial intelligence, bioengineering. Most people don’t contribute anything to that, except perhaps for their data. And whatever people are still doing which is useful, these technologies will increasingly make redundant and make it possible to replace the people.

 

[Iconoclast]

All of these ideals converging upon humanity, the far-right's obsession with purity at all costs, the warmongering bugling of neoconservatives, the greed and vain materialism of neoliberals, and the grotesque hive-mind-like collectivism of the far-left, they all have one thing in common; they are all aimed at dismantling the human ego, the human person, making ridiculous demands of us.

Unenlightened self-interest is bad, says the right-winger. Stop masturbating to Pornhub, stop wasting away, go to the gym, get a tradwife, outbreed the immigrants.

Unenlightened self-interest is bad, says the neocon. If you're not enlisting in the military, you're not risking life and limb on behalf of people who hate you and want you dead.

Unenlightened self-interest is bad, says the neolib. Stop being a protectionist and just accept that there are other people out there willing to do your job for less money, thus making you worthless.

Unenlightened self-interest is bad, says the far-left SJW turd. Stop ogling cute video game character's asses, that's demeaning to women, we need you to be a good ally for the cause.

Unenlightened self-interest is bad, says Klaus Schwab. We need you to eat the bugs and live in a small concrete prison cell to let the planet regenerate from the years of overconsumption that enriched our members, while we scrape all your data, quietly depopulate you, and replace you with AI.

A parade of pointless sacrifices.

The individual comes first. The ego comes first. Society can go fuck itself.

 

[Vyor]

The individual comes first. The ego comes first. Society can go fuck itself.

Ah yes, you wish us to become as apes, a bunch of savage idiots tearing one another's throats out to get ahead.

 

[Cherico]

Ah yes, you wish us to become as apes, a bunch of savage idiots tearing one another's throats out to get ahead.

Human societies are founded on recipical relationships.

This has always been the case, and when a given leadership decides to not compensate the rest of society things go horribly wrong until they are replaced by a new less retarded leadership class. I mean this is civics 101 so yes he has a point about rational self interest and soceity should keep that in mind instead of making blaket demands of people and telling them to suck it up.

 

[Iconoclast]

Ah yes, you wish us to become as apes, a bunch of savage idiots tearing one another's throats out to get ahead.

That’s what we already are. Just because some people have a weird authority fetish, that doesn’t mean we ever actually stopped being savage apes. Look what people do when they don’t get what they want. They loot, en masse. Can’t even go to Target now without watching a horde of shoplifters run out with armfuls of clothing.

Politics is all about deciding how spoils are divided. If you don’t get a share, then you have no reason to contribute. Our elites don’t do a goddamn thing without asking, “What’s in it for me?”, but they love to sell stupid altruism memes like patriotism, self-sacrifice, duty, and courage to little people who are gullible enough to throw their lives away for the sake of hedonistic ingrates who don’t even know they exist.

>thank you for your service!
>you shot that Muslim dude in the sandbox real good!
>thanks to you, we get to buy Chinese plastic dolls and live in a 400-square-foot apartment in San Fran getting pounded in the poopers by our Grindr matches all night
>I mean, I’m sure we still could’ve done all that had you not shot that poor violent non-state actor in a mud hut, but thanks anyway!

Imagine if politicians were honest.

>we need you to become crippled by an IED to prop up a Weimarized shithole debt slave zone
>your life means absolutely nothing to anyone with one iota of real power
>you will never own a single-family zoned home in a quiet suburb
>we’re all a bunch of baby-eating, Ivy-league, skull-and-bones oligarch ball fluffers
>we hate you dumb hayseeds and we want you to suffer
>obey or die

I could at least respect that kind of audacious evil if they had the guts to just come right out and say it to our faces, but they never even come close. It’s always freedom this and democracy that. A nation-building fiction that has produced jack squat, except for turning little babies on the other side of the planet into dead bodies wreathed in concrete dust.



Working for a wage and paying taxes in this shitbox of a society is a waste. What purpose does it serve? Our oligarchs just print themselves great big heaps of counterfeit money and keep gambling as long as they like. The rest of us get utterly screwed by being priced out of long-term goals, like home ownership, starting a family, et cetera, due to inflation. From their perspective, this is a good thing because we breed too much anyway, and they'd rather we didn't hang onto our cash in savings accounts hoping for it to appreciate in value. They'd rather we spent money on the mind-numbingly stupid things their corporations make, instead.

>don't buy a home
>don't settle down
>just keep renting things
>keep paying subscription fees
>keep buying pointless knickknacks
>you don't need plans
>you don't need a future
>you don't need a family, you just need a little dopamine rush from consooming a silly little injection-molded figurine
>here's a game with fifty skin colors and sixty different genders and sexualities in it
>you must buy it along with all the other things you bought
>you must demonstrate your loyalty to your masters by buying
>buy stuff buy stuff buy stuff

The WEF are trying to make this despicable living condition universal across the entire surface of the planet. The only honorable thing you can do, when faced with a society so blatantly immoral and anti-human, is to literally revert to monke and steal and break as much shit as you can in the hopes that you can bleed the oligarchs completely dry. If society wants to completely deny you a rightful share, if you work like a dog at a full-time job and still can't afford to have a house, a wife, and kids, then I say you are well within your rights to revert to total meth-head behavior and rip copper wire out of J-boxes to sell to scrapyards.

Society is meaningless. It's like Burning Man. It's like a mass, organized form of performance art. Eventually, the carnies pack up. We're at that stage again, right now.

 

[Vyor]

Freedom comes from Law.

 

[Iconoclast]

Freedom comes from Law.

Yes. Now, try getting the hundreds of rich, horny degenerates who flew with Jeffrey Epstein on the Lolita Express and fucked teen girls while he filmed them to abide by it.

 

[Zachowon]

Yes. Now, try getting the hundreds of rich, horny degenerates who flew with Jeffrey Epstein on the Lolita Express and fucked teen girls while he filmed them to abide by it.

Easy. You make sure your justice system actually will try them and money won't save them.
Or they become legitimate targets in war and well, free game

 

[Cherico]

Freedom comes from Law.

Much of the 20th century and human history proves this wrong.

 

[Vyor]

Much of the 20th century and human history proves this wrong.

The entirety of human history proves me right.

No laws? Someone will make them, and they won't benefit you.

Laws must exist to protect you from other people and the government itself.

Roper: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law?
More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
More: Oh? And, when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast – man's laws, not God's – and, if you cut them down – and you're just the man to do it – d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.

 

[Cherico]

The entirety of human history proves me right.

No laws? Someone will make them, and they won't benefit you.

Laws must exist to protect you from other people and the government itself.

You litterally just proved my point.

Laws are a neutral thing and do not in and of themselves protect or create rights.

They can and have been used for evil means just as much as for good. Each law must be judged on its own merits and not given acolades just because its a law.

 

[Vyor]

You litterally just proved my point.

Laws are a neutral thing and do not in and of themselves protect or create rights.

They can and have been used for evil means just as much as for good. Each law must be judged on its own merits and not given acolades just because its a law.

When did I say otherwise? I said Freedom comes from Law, I passed no judgement on any specific law, just that they were needed in general.

 

[ATP]

Much of the 20th century and human history proves this wrong.

You have a point.Worst crimes were committed according to existing laws.

When did I say otherwise? I said Freedom comes from Law, I passed no judgement on any specific law, just that they were needed in general.

You also have a point - there is no society without law.


@Captain X , i would undarstandt if they hide our christian heritage,or even some jewish heritage.But why hide heritage of shamans who lived 11.000 years ago?
Unless they belive in Emprah from WH40,it do not have sense.Dude was created in Anatolia after all.....

 

[Iconoclast]

Laws and treaties are absolutely pointless when the ruling class only pretends to abide by them.

The oligarchs have taken it upon themselves to enclose the human commons, to turn all of us into their machine learning data slaves, to keep us around and pay us a dole just long enough for AI to imitate us, at which point, the human person, the human body, becomes obsolete. This is what is meant by biopolitics. It is when the state exerts control over the fundamental biological features of human life. It is eugenics by another name. It is the notion that the state should have the power to decide its composition, what proportion of human bodies fits what role, what model of human, and so on, as if the State were picking what kind of citizens it wanted like someone picking and choosing from different breeds of livestock, or different models of car on a dealer lot.

When some WEF-aligned goon says some creepy shit like, "Maybe we can modify humans to be smaller and use less food", that's biopolitics. Imagine the kind of warped mind one would need to propose modifying people at the germline level just to compensate for society's failures. At that point, the social contract is already null and void. Why shouldn't someone threatened with germline modification to fit societal goals check out completely, go off the grid, and blast any trespassers with a shotgun? This is why natural rights are so important. If you don't believe that the individual is paramount, that humans have an intrinsic right to live in recognizably human lifeways without their essence being perverted by the unethical application of technology, then you open the door to every kind of abuse.

These things should be outside the scope of government. As in, governments should not have a say in any of this. Who we freely associate with should be up to our individual discretion. It is not the government's job to look at you or me and say, "You're kind of like a Holstein cow, I wanted Angus". That's obscene.

What makes it even more obscene is that these biopolitical goals come from private entities that have captured government through private-public partnerships, GONGOs, and so on, so it's not even the government saying they want to pick and choose what human stock they want. It's just some rich psychopaths wearing our government like a skin suit.

Academia Weighs In On Technocracy and Transhumanism

OMNIWAR: A SYMPOSIUM PRESENTED BYTHE STUDY GROUP ON TECHNOLOGY AND POWER RSVP FOR THE LIVESTREAM & NOTIFICATIONS RSVP Your support for the Study Group on...

www.technocracy.news

When are people going to realize that literally everything we have been fed is a fucking lie?

 

[Captain X]

@Captain X , i would undarstandt if they hide our christian heritage,or even some jewish heritage.But why hide heritage of shamans who lived 11.000 years ago?
Unless they belive in Emprah from WH40,it do not have sense.Dude was created in Anatolia after all.....

Because even just the age of the site throws into question the official narrative of the past, and they don't want people thinking too much about that.

 

[ATP]

Because even just the age of the site throws into question the official narrative of the past, and they don't want people thinking too much about that.

But why? older civilizations in stone age existed.So what? whatever heritage they had,it is lost now.
Why hiding existence of old civilizations,when we do not even knew,in what they belived ?