More connecting dots in previously seen info, and putting forth a possible reason why armed militias may have been 'hunting FEMA'. FEMA and the Forest Service are both Feds to the locals, so it may be painting both with the same brush.Are you basing the Armed Militias threatening FEMA due to the Forest Service wanting to "close the local forests" and arresting people on something beyond the fact it's allegedly happening or is this just theory crafting motivations?
I'm not convinced that armed Militias genuinely "hunting" or threatening FEMA exists, much less ascribing specific actions to the motivation of their creation beyond broad negative perceptions of the federal government and it's response.
While the federal response has been poor, like in most disaster areas the state is in charge, local authorities are the ones who effect government action the most and federals are only there to advise and support.
I think cultural differences in open carry seem far more likely for the initial cause of tension and the general antipathy and hate directed towards FEMA and the federal government as well documented on social media and local communixations as being a better explanation of this "armed Militias" allegation then one specific thing reportedly enacted by a wholly different agency (the Forest Service).
It can also be someone just coming up with an excuse to pull back personnel/resource for another reason, if the militias are entirely fake.