'Climate Change' and the coming 'Climate Lockdown'

While this is old news for... well... anyone who pays attention, it's still a good thing. The "whistleblower" (lol) is a Californian. I'll take it.
 
Does nobody here remember the scandal at the Climate Research Unit in East Anglia University?

Where leaked e-mails showed they'd lied about what the data indicated, and were now actively working to destroy the data to keep it from being used against them?
I do, this is why I said "tuesday". It is a meme reference to something that happens all the time.
This is not the first whistleblower. We get a constant parade of them.
But the tech cartels and corpo media just memory hole it.
 
Yeah @mrttao is right, this shit happens every other month.
"Breaking news, Climate cabal has been changing historical data!"
"This just in, newest temperature readings do not pass peer review!"
"Renowned climate scientist admits its all a hoax, loses job immediately"
At this point I feel bad for some of the more normie whistle-blowers. They don't know that it's all bullshit and it's always been that way, they think that they are reporting on a unique aberrant situation. They then get really confused when all the practiced memory hole and unperson tools get deployed on them.
 
I will never understand why people here hate the idea of walkable cities. Commuting from city to suburb and back by car everyday sucks.
Because when leftists say "walkable cities" they think it's some sort of commuist utopia where fruit trees line the streets and your job is right next door with everyone smiling and waving.

When any reasonable person with working brain cells hears "walkable cities" and notices it's megacorps pushing for them, we know it's a tyrannical techno-future hellhole straight out of a bad 80's sci fi movie, except with even more crime and bullshit.

And if these 'walkable cities' are so great, how come everyone keeps fleeing them? Are they afraid of how great and superior they are? How odd that you never see Bill Gates or elite banksters wandering walkable cities without an armed detail.
 
I will never understand why people here hate the idea of walkable cities. Commuting from city to suburb and back by car everyday sucks.
They want to ban cars and ban private farms.
The idea is that oligarchs will own all the farmland through blackrock.
Oligarchs will own all the housing.

You will be a wageslave that wake up in your rented pod-house, walk 15 minutes to work, walk 15 minutes back home. And you cannot even get into a car and run away from this hellhole because cars are illegal "to save the planet"
 
I will never understand why people here hate the idea of walkable cities. Commuting from city to suburb and back by car everyday sucks.
Commuting sucks, period.

From suburb or village to city and inside of a "walk-able" city, too.

Me, I am no farther than 10 -15 minutes from 3 major stores, one hypermarket, one discount, one mall and 2 large electronics retailers.

That did not help much when I had to commute every so often.
 
AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories. Well that an operating under the assumption that buying a house in the suburbs is realistic for many people and and not realizing that increasing number of people living in suburbs rent their housing there rather than owning it.
 
AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories.
facepalm.
we literally have videos of the worlds oligarchs gathering up in the world economic forum and outlining their plans exactly and specifically.
it is not conspiracy theories. it is conspiracy facts.

Also, you must have been living under a rock somewhere if you have not noticed the "for the environment" ban craze.
They say it is a conspiracy theory until the very moment they go through with the ban.
Like how they repeatedly said nobody wants to ban gas stoves and then they started banning gas stoves.
 
AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories. Well that an operating under the assumption that buying a house in the suburbs is realistic for many people and and not realizing that increasing number of people living in suburbs rent their housing there rather than owning it.
Protip, 'conspiracy theory' doesn't mean it's nonsense.
It just means there's a theory of a conspiracy, and conspiracies are real/existing things.

And they openly talk about this shit on live TV, it's not nonsense at all.

You WILL live in the pod.

You WILL eat the bugs.

You WILL own nothing.

And YOU WILL BE HAPPY.
 
AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories. Well that an operating under the assumption that buying a house in the suburbs is realistic for many people and and not realizing that increasing number of people living in suburbs rent their housing there rather than owning it.
If it is something a few rich assholes like the Gates foundation and the WEF are pushing then you probably don't want any part of it.

My 2 cents, I have been living in a much denser urban environment, there are positives as well as negatives.

The commie execution was certainly quite bad in places, but having a 24/7 type store that mostly sells beverages and sweets and a bunch of other shops in walking distance is nice, cabling up the internet is also easier.

There is a world of difference between this:

847_rsz-Dom-1---900x600.jpg


And this:

epk.jpg
 
AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories. Well that an operating under the assumption that buying a house in the suburbs is realistic for many people and and not realizing that increasing number of people living in suburbs rent their housing there rather than owning it.
Here is a video released by world economic forum, a yearly meeting in Davos resort in switzerland.

The minimum requirement to be invited to WEF is to make over 5 billion dollars a year with your business. almost all the oligarchs from western nations are members of the WEF.

On November 10th, 2016, Danish MP Ida Auken published[1][4] an essay "Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better," for World Economic Forum. In the essay, Auken makes a prediction for year 2030, writing that in 2030 one doesn't own a house, a car, appliances or clothes, instead renting everything. The essay also predicts mass surveillance and a society split in two. As of 2022, the essay is no longer available on the World Economic Forum's website.

The essay was summarized in the "8 Prediction for the World in 2030" article by the World Economic Forum,[2] published on November 16th, 2016 (extract shown below).

"I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes," writes Danish MP Ida Auken. Shopping is a distant memory in the city of 2030, whose inhabitants have cracked clean energy and borrow what they need on demand. It sounds utopian, until she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate vision of a society split in two.
Together with the article, World Economic Forum posted a video "8 Predictions for the World in 2030" to its website,[2] Facebook[3] and Twitter[5] (tweet no longer available). The first prediction in the video, based on Auken's essay, states "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy. Whatever you want you'll rent and it'll be delivered by a drone." The video (shown below) accumulated over 9,900 reactions and 766,000 views on Facebook in five years.


You might say "well clearly this is just a single random moron"... except the WEF itself decided to push the "you will own nothing and be happy" on their website, facebook, and twitter.

 
I will never understand why people here hate the idea of walkable cities. Commuting from city to suburb and back by car everyday sucks.

If you want to live in one, that's your choice. But don't try to force everyone else into it.
Does "I will never understand" really mean "I refuse to understand" ?

AKA a bunch of nonsensical conspiracy theories. Well that an operating under the assumption that buying a house in the suburbs is realistic for many people and and not realizing that increasing number of people living in suburbs rent their housing there rather than owning it.

The answer to that is that we need to make it be realistic for Joe Normal to outright own his suburban or rural home. The sort of plan I have vaguely in mind involves a big pile of dead oligarchs.

Anyway, before you sound of on "I don't understand why..." or suchlike, maybe educate yourself a little on what is actually being discussed. Lean about the type of existence the Important People intend for everyone else, and ask yourself sane questions like:
"Is this the sort of environment in which anyone would want to try to raise children?"
 
Last edited:
Dang!

Those crazy conspiracy theorists have been right about everything for years now!

And the media and political leaders always call them liars before admitting they were the ones lying and the conspiracy theorists were right the whole time several months later.

Are the conspiracy theorists more well researched and investigative than main stream journalism? Am I truly so out of touch?

...

No. It's the children conspiracy theorists that are wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top