Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Ryan McBeth, the former armored infantryman NCO turned OSINT guy did an analysis of the uncensored video on his Substack which is free to see for two weeks or whatever.


Said it was likely Ukrainian Marines, not Special Forces, storming a more recently made trench.

He was more concerned with analysing supposed war crimes that people have alleged occurred within the video. Of which he saw nothing in violation. Shooting unarmed soldiers in combat and double tapping felled soldiers soon after isn't illegal. And if your a journalist, if you pick up a weapon you are in fact then a lawful combatant.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Ryan McBeth, the former armored infantryman NCO turned OSINT guy did an analysis of the uncensored video on his Substack which is free to see for two weeks or whatever.


Said it was likely Ukrainian Marines, not Special Forces, storming a more recently made trench.

He was more concerned with analysing supposed war crimes that people have alleged occurred within the video. Of which he saw nothing in violation. Shooting unarmed soldiers in combat and double tapping felled soldiers soon after isn't illegal. And if your a journalist, if you pick up a weapon you are in fact then a lawful combatant.
Yup. It's soldiers doing this, not policemen, they have no obligation to act like policemen (and softie modern western ones at that), no matter how some screeching bleeding hearts (and some further tactical screeching bleeding hearts) imply it. If such a rule existed and was applied consistently, attacking rear areas of the enemy with long range weapons would be effectively illegal, as most enemy soldiers there would not carry weapons on them at all times.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
If you are talking about a military base in peacetime, that can make sense.
But in wartime, in trenches on the front lines?

I would point out that centralized storage is a historically proven method of maintaining security against both internal and external threats. I mean, it's not as if the Japanese could actually directly attack Pearl Harbor with conventional military forces, the major concern out there is spies and saboteurs.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Yup. It's soldiers doing this, not policemen, they have no obligation to act like policemen (and softie modern western ones at that), no matter how some screeching bleeding hearts (and some further tactical screeching bleeding hearts) imply it. If such a rule existed and was applied consistently, attacking rear areas of the enemy with long range weapons would be effectively illegal, as most enemy soldiers there would not carry weapons on them at all times.
Western police actually use much more aggressive rules of engagement than infantry typically do, based on the idea that police have legal immunity for all good-faith actions and have broad discretion to disregard standing orders and operational procedures if they feel there is any danger to themselves. Soldiers are not employees (as legally defined), and are generally required to follow orders regardless of danger.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Western police actually use much more aggressive rules of engagement than infantry typically do, based on the idea that police have legal immunity for all good-faith actions and have broad discretion to disregard standing orders and operational procedures if they feel there is any danger to themselves. Soldiers are not employees (as legally defined), and are generally required to follow orders regardless of danger.
Infantry in western COIN ops definitely could get very strict with rules of engagement for "optics" reasons, however it is the choice if their leadership, as LOAC do not mandate them to be anywhere near as strict.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Infantry in western COIN ops definitely could get very strict with rules of engagement for "optics" reasons, however it is the choice if their leadership, as LOAC do not mandate them to be anywhere near as strict.
Yes, but that's a command decision, whereas with police, "Hey, I felt threatened by this totally unarmed guy, because, uh, he looked aggressive!!" is totally a valid reason for disregarding orders essentially at will. Never mind the rules on collateral damage...
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Stupid comparison anyways.

We're talking about double tapping fools and shooting unarmed combatants. Not choking out drug addicts. The Ukrainian Marines aren't going to get a tribunal reviewing whether the shooting was legitimate or not whilst placed on administrative leave like a cop would at the bare minimum in the case of shooting an unarmed uhhh combatant lol.

I can't recall any cases of a random cop shooting someone... pausing... and then double and triple tapping their unmoving body just to make sure. Maybe it's super common.

I'm sure we can get gaslit with some random articles/arguments to further derail the conversation though about how policing Portland is like.... comparable to Bakhmut or Stalingrad or something.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Stupid comparison anyways.

We're talking about double tapping fools and shooting unarmed combatants. Not choking out drug addicts. The Ukrainian Marines aren't going to get a tribunal reviewing whether the shooting was legitimate or not whilst placed on administrative leave like a cop would at the bare minimum in the case of shooting an unarmed uhhh combatant lol.
Fair point. That's always been in the rules of war; a combatant who is merely unarmed and/or retreating is not deemed a surrender. Surrender has to be explicitly communicated, and it isn't in that case.

Edit: Note that while raised arms and/or a white flag are the most common means of indicating surrender, there's no *specific* requirement for them.


I can't recall any cases of a random cop shooting someone... pausing... and then double and triple tapping their unmoving body just to make sure. Maybe it's super common.

The pause is the key point here -- police procedure in high stress situations tends to be de facto "empty the magazine then pause to assess while reloading", so the "cold blooded" double tap doesn't happen.
 
Last edited:

King Arts

Well-known member
I saw this in the morning, it's combat footage reportedly released or taken by Ukrainian Special Forces storming a Russian trench. People get shot in this video. It's pretty wild.



I was going to sit on sharing it just because... but now people are reporting one of the people who were killed in the video was the infamous pro-Russian reporter Semyon Pegov or 'War Gonzo' because one of the armed combatants shot on screen was seen wearing blue (ie 'press') clothing and shared some of the prominent features of Sergey like the red beard and potential likelihood of suffering from massive head trauma.

Most people are meme'ing off of his possible death and honestly, it seems unlikely to me at this juncture. I doubt he'd consider using a gun even if the UkroNazis were storming the trench and he had one forcibly super glued to his hands.







Ultimately, it is kind of tragic watching the video to be honest. The people shot and killed in this video, they seemed very unprepared for what was about to happen to them. Russia is shoveling poorly prepared mobilized troops into this War and they are dying every day and it's all preventable if Russia leaves Ukraine.

Anyone got a translation for what they were yelling?
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
I doubt that would work.. it's a bit too far north of the tropics.

You have no idea about the US Biolabs in Ukraine do you?

We were on the verge of greatness. We were this close!

Pandemic spreading birds. Diseases that could target specific ethnicities. Drone deployed temperate climate malaria mosquitos.

All gone now... Like tears in the rain... flood.
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
I doubt that would work.. it's a bit too far north of the tropics.
You have no idea about the US Biolabs in Ukraine do you?

We were on the verge of greatness. We were this close!

Pandemic spreading birds. Diseases that could target specific ethnicities. Drone deployed temperate climate malaria mosquitos.

All gone now... Like tears in the rain... flood.
Just a reminder : the research of the China flu was backed by American dollars given to Fauci.

So it wouldn't surprise me D.C. financed them over there as well.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
I doubt that would work.. it's a bit too far north of the tropics.
It's cover for the disease spread caused by the lack of water going into Crimea and the Kherson region after they blew the dam.

Because all sorts of nasty bugs have been running wild in the Russian trenches since the dam blew, and the Russians effectively cut off their own fresh water supply to their troops in the south.
 

Skallagrim

Well-known member
I doubt that would work.. it's a bit too far north of the tropics.

It's wet enough, and in summer, certainly warm enough. We used to see "swamp fever" (malaria) ubiquitously in the Netherlands -- also very much North of the Tropics. It persisted until the early 20th century, which is when the inpoldering was completed and the country's swampy nature finally came to an end.

It's fucking retarded as a weapon of war; if you're going to use bio-weapons, I can think of countless superior ones, but malaria could thrive in the Ukrainian summer. In marshy enough locations, that is.

Like, for instance, an area largely flooded and turned into a massive swamp after some asshole blew up a big dam.

(To be clear: I'm not implying that the claim about this, uh "malaria-bomb" is true. I think it's utter nonsense.)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top