Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

how many Rothschild were killed in the Holocaust?

Zero.

The Nazis even captured a Rothschild

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild - Wikipedia

but they let him go for a ransom

instead the Nazis choose to kill the legit, Orthodox Jews, which the Rothchilds and Co. used as a sacrifice to save their own skins

Rothchilds and Co. are not real Jews. That is why we must use the term Zionist instead of Jew to differentiate between the two.

They only use Judaism and the term Jew as cover for their nefarious activities.

And Israel is their resort/money laundering center/army.

But what they don't know is that when their deception is revealed, the real Jews in Israel will turn against them alongside the rest of the world.


Uh-huh, ranting more conspiracies about the Rothschilds?

Cool story, “bro.”
 
conspiracies about the Rothschilds?
Most likely, this family, like many great families, conspired for many years, but not in the way many people imagine a conspiracy, well, and of a much smaller intensity and scale. Much more popularly, we call them pressures in a person's or organization's dream direction, and it's done by anyone who wants something.

Here, on the other hand, we have a typical donkey who believes in great conspiracies on a global scale that supposedly would be easily observable by ordinary mortals.
 
Weeklong Threadban for Violation of Rule 2A
when you learn the hard way that Ukrop fascists are only one step up from African and Middle Eastern rapefugees



pity

Mr. Piggie was a better creature than most Ukrops

He did not deserve this.

RIP Mr. Piggie
 
Most likely, this family, like many great families, conspired for many years, but not in the way many people imagine a conspiracy, well, and of a much smaller intensity and scale. Much more popularly, we call them pressures in a person's or organization's dream direction, and it's done by anyone who wants something.

This is it. Oh my God, if I could bash a certain segment of the Right over the head with this the discourse would be much improved.

The Rothschilds are a wealthy and powerful aristocratic dynasty. They've got skeletons in the closet, but they are so far from out of the ordinary. And yet some people obsess about them to an autistic extent.

Mr. Piggie was a better creature than most Ukrops

You are a disgrace to your forefathers.
 
when you learn the hard way that Ukrop fascists are only one step up from African and Middle Eastern rapefugees



pity

Mr. Piggie was a better creature than most Ukrops

He did not deserve this.

RIP Mr. Piggie


Comparing Ukrainian refugees to be lower than pigs.

Calling African and middle eastern refugees “rapeugees.”

You are a sick and disgusting piece of work. You keep ranting about Nazis, but going by your statements, pretty clear who’s emulating them here.
 

Well, I can't say I predicted this step on the sliding scale of cope, but it's certainly an amusing one. Of course, it's from Yahoo, so it might be a bogus story, but I'm really just posting it for the entertainment value anyways.

TL;DR: Some Russian officials are now claiming US biolabs have turned Ukrainians into super-soldiers, and that's why the war is going the way it is.

Ahem.


Care to reconsider your statement?

Looks like those Unbeatable Russian SAMs are actually just that considering they just shot down an enhanced 4.5 Generation Strike Aircraft... You know... the same Aircraft that most of NATO's Air Forces are made up of. If they can do this to an Aircraft that only first came out in 2014... imagine what they'll do to those far older NATO aircraft.

The SU-34 first flew in 1990. That it took the Russians another 24 years to put it into service is not an accolade.

Further, it's a development of the SU-27, which is a design harking back to 1977. So it's more comparable to either the Hornet or Super-Hornet, at best. Given how Soviet aircraft have historically actually performed compared to US-built designs, this at best indicates the Russian SAMs would have a chance at shooting down era-equivalent US aircraft.

And of course, that doesn't get into the fact that standing US doctrine is to use the cutting edge, more survivable equipment, to wipe out air defenses, then send in the older aircraft in as more cost-effective bomb trucks to pulverize the now-exposed ground forces.
 
Comparing Ukrainian refugees to be lower than pigs.
Calling African and middle eastern refugees “rapeugees.”
You are a sick and disgusting piece of work. You keep ranting about Nazis, but going by your statements, pretty clear who’s emulating them here.
Well, I'll just say this much: he's just a totally fucked up Canadian.
And when he started ranting that Russia is good, a light already went on for me. Oh fuck, Russia good?
This monster?
This is it. Oh my God, if I could bash a certain segment of the Right over the head with this the discourse would be much improved.
Then whack every such person over the head with a stick until they wise up.
It can't be done otherwise, simply put.

Further, it's a development of the SU-27, which is a design harking back to 1977. So it's more comparable to either the Hornet or Super-Hornet, at best. Given how Soviet aircraft have historically actually performed compared to US-built designs, this at best indicates the Russian SAMs would have a chance at shooting down era-equivalent US aircraft.
This reminds me of how every Polish communist-era aircraft project that wasn't meant to be purely training, mysteriously resembled American machines.
And strangely none made it beyond the drawing board stage.
 
Well, I'll just say this much: he's just a totally fucked up Canadian.
And when he started ranting that Russia is good, a light already went on for me. Oh fuck, Russia good?
This monster?

His views are definitely strange for a Canadian, though. Canadians are supposed to be liberal.

Interestingly enough, Canada also has some Ukrainian-plurality counties:

Censusdivisions-ethnic.png
 
how many Rothschild were killed in the Holocaust?

Zero.

The Nazis even captured a Rothschild

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild - Wikipedia

but they let him go for a ransom

instead the Nazis choose to kill the legit, Orthodox Jews, which the Rothchilds and Co. used as a sacrifice to save their own skins

Rothchilds and Co. are not real Jews. That is why we must use the term Zionist instead of Jew to differentiate between the two.

They only use Judaism and the term Jew as cover for their nefarious activities.

And Israel is their resort/money laundering center/army.

But what they don't know is that when their deception is revealed, the real Jews in Israel will turn against them alongside the rest of the world.

1.Some polish wealthy aristocrats was spared,too - when average polish gentry was killed when germans genocided our elites.
Money could speak.

2.How many money those orthodox jews have?

3.Rotschild did exactly the same like Morgans and other gojims from Wall Street.They are responsible for terrible things,but as member of Wall Street,not jews.

4.fake Izrael as Wall Street army? WHY? they had USA for that.With bigger and better army.

5.Assuming that you are right - jews was sell by their elites to german for slaughter,and rarely fought.Why this time it would be different?
 
Canadians are supposed to be liberal.
To quote the Polish animated series, Kapitan Bomba (Captain Bomb)
There are only two rational explanations
1 The physics of the Black Hole
2 Witchcraft

Canada also has some Ukrainian-plurality counties:
Ukrainians in the 19th century colonized en masse what they could.
Have you heard of Green Ruthenia?
It's where Vladivostok and Outer Manchuria are.
Until the massive Russification of the Ukrainians, the entire region was mostly Ukrainian, and during the civil war they tried to rebel and build their far eastern Ukraine.
 
Ukrainians in the 19th century colonized en masse what they could.
Have you heard of Green Ruthenia?
It's where Vladivostok and Outer Manchuria are.
Until the massive Russification of the Ukrainians, the entire region was mostly Ukrainian, and during the civil war they tried to rebel and build their far eastern Ukraine.

Yep, Green Ukraine:


There's also Grey Ukraine:


A Ukrainian hyper-nationalist will insist on not only the recovery of all of Ukraine's 1992 territories, but also on the recovery of th Kuban, Grey Ukraine, and Green Ukraine! :D ;)
 
As I understand it, whilst the Ukrainians are the same people as the Russians (East Slavs) they do have a distinct culture of their own. This war has brought home just how different they are, and I think victory in this war shall put them on the road to greatness.

Because if Ukraine wins, they become the foremost military force in Eastern Europe. Tremendous power and influence would come with that.
 
As I understand it, whilst the Ukrainians are the same people as the Russians (East Slavs) they do have a distinct culture of their own. This war has brought home just how different they are, and I think victory in this war shall put them on the road to greatness.

Because if Ukraine wins, they become the foremost military force in Eastern Europe. Tremendous power and influence would come with that.

Whether Ukrainians and Russians are one people is beside the point; two people can belong to a single family and yet one of them can prefer to associate with another family instead because they treat them much better than their own family does, for instance.
 
Indeed.

A classic example of that is the English and the Americans are not quite the same are they?

Or the Americans and Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders. Or the Czechs and Slovaks. Or the Spanish and Portuguese. Or the Thais and Laotians. Or the Danes, Swedes, and Norwegians. Or the Germans and Austrians. Or the Bulgarians and Macedonians. Et cetera.
 
As I understand it, whilst the Ukrainians are the same people as the Russians (East Slavs) they do have a distinct culture of their own. This war has brought home just how different they are, and I think victory in this war shall put them on the road to greatness.
Also their own language, and somewhat divergent historical heritage - for few hundred years most of today's Ukraine was ruled by Lithuania while Russia was under Mongol management, and then joined PLC with Lithuania. Few hundred years of separate history and different foreign influences of course had to cause some cultural differences.
Because if Ukraine wins, they become the foremost military force in Eastern Europe. Tremendous power and influence would come with that.
That's not how it works, Poland wasn't in 1921, and Finland wasn't in 1940.
 
Also their own language, and somewhat divergent historical heritage - for few hundred years most of today's Ukraine was ruled by Lithuania while Russia was under Mongol management, and then joined PLC with Lithuania.

That's not how it works, Poland wasn't in 1921, and Finland wasn't in 1940.

The Polonkadonks (Poles) did not have the US as an ally in the interwar era. Neither did the Finns in 1939-1940.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top