Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Interesting thing about Moscov politic regarding catholic abbeys.

They stealed all from catholic abbey in Marjunpol,and then turned it into their HQ.

Another catholic abbey,in Worzel near Kiev,was during their occupation robbed of anything useful,they even decapitated figure of Holy Mary which was inside.
In the same time,our great pope is doing everything he can to speak with Putin,becouse in his opinion Moscov was humilitated.
Putin do not found time for him till now.

Well,i would remain catholic.I like History,so i knew tat we have worst popes.

P.S source - polish catholic newspaper "Nasz dziennik" ,issues from 20 and 19.5.2022.
 

Another one in the UK. I'm surprised this time it was a married man and not a bachelor.
 

Another one in the UK. I'm surprised this time it was a married man and not a bachelor.

lol Ukrainian beauties are just so seductive! :D ;)


 
The S-500 is meaningless, just like the T-14 is meaningless, just like the Su-57 is meaningless. The Russians are a paper bear.

Unless it is all feint.Becouse KGBstan is only state which really do not care how many of its soldiers die,as long as they win in the end.
Back to Izrael - interesting case of murdered journalist.
Shireen Abu Akleh was schoot by jews when she wear clothes with "press" - so,they must target her.//she was talking about another jewish atrocity on West Bank/
Later ,during funeral,jewish police beaten people.

Much worst then Poland,when we do not murder people,worst even then France which do not beat people during funerals - but,...
STILL BETTER THEN MOSCOV!
So,it seems,that Izraeli standarts are between Asia and Europe.
 
What a fucking bastard cretin.

Can't blame him for considering Slavic beauties irresistable! :D ;)

Most wars tend to include extremely costly mistakes because the militaries aren't properly prepared.

You fight with what you have. You do not get to pick or choose what you want or need.

Yep. As they say, you play with the hand you're dealt with. Though sometimes the decision to play at all is a voluntary one.
 


Tulsi Gabbard is once again being a Russian shill. I understand the need to help the American people, but why exactly can't this be done simultaneously with helping Ukraine? As for what winning is and how this ends, winning would mean an end to Russia's offensive and having Russia permanently give up on its efforts to conquer Ukraine. At the very least, this would mean preventing Ukraine from losing any or at least much additional territory to the Russians while also ensuring that Russia eventually gives up its effort to try to conquer Ukraine AND DOES NOT TRY doing the same thing again sometime in the future. Would also be nice if Ukraine also had a say in its future choice of alliances, though I suspect that the West might enjoy seeing Russian bled dry in Ukraine and thus might unfortunately be hesitant to offer Ukraine even non-NATO security guarantees. :(
 


Again, Tulsi, victory means an end to Russia's current offensive in Ukraine without Ukraine losing much, if any, additional territory of its and Russia also never attempting to engage in a repeat of what it did this year, whether in Ukraine or anywhere else, such as in Kazakhstan, in Mongolia, or in the Baltic countries.

Ideally, it would be nice to push Russia back to the January 2022 borders in Ukraine, but even halting the situation at the existing front lines would be tolerable just so long as Russia never actually attempts a repeat of this in the form of a Russian Invasion: Act 2.
 
Russia's First Documented Loss of a 2S4 Tyulpan 240 mm self-propelled heavy mortar in Rubizhne. As widely reported on social media, Russian News covered the redeployment of several of these units from Mariupol to the Donbass recently. Apparently this one only lasted a day or so after being redeployed.



To give you an idea of how large a 240mm gun is ... WWII-era heavy cruisers were limited - by treaty - to 203mm.
 
To give you an idea of how large a 240mm gun is ... WWII-era heavy cruisers were limited - by treaty - to 203mm.
It is a mortar, those tend to have very wide bores, relatively short barrel lengths, and much less powder charge than direct fire artillery.
 
Russia is the only one hurting Russia. Russia can stop this invasion at any time and go home.



I haven't seen very many people, outside of Tucker Carlson, "getting bitchy" about our weapons blowing up Russian tanks. Almost like people mind a lot less when their money is actually visibly doing something instead of being sent to a bunch of 5th-century barbarians who capitulate to the enemy immediately solely because the elitist political class can't admit their power and wisdom aren't infinite. Victory is it's own argument.



Do you think nukes are magic death rays, or something? You can indeed fight on a nuclear battlefield and in point of fact most big armies are prepared to do so. There's a reason tanks and AFVs in every significant world power are equipped with full Nuclear, Biological and Chemical protection systems (overpressure to keep the nasty air outside.)

Do you think that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian shill? I do.
 
Considering most of the news we have seen, we can safely say that Russia, unlike Confederacy, does not care much for the well being of its own soldiers.

You're giving the Confederacy too much credit. One of the major contributing factors in their defeat was that they decided they would rather allow tens of thousands of their own soldiers to rot in prisoner of war camps when the United States was entirely willing to engage in prisoner exchanges *except* for the Confederacy's insistence that they would not exchange black prisoners.
 


Tulsi Gabbard is once again being a Russian shill. I understand the need to help the American people, but why exactly can't this be done simultaneously with helping Ukraine? As for what winning is and how this ends, winning would mean an end to Russia's offensive and having Russia permanently give up on its efforts to conquer Ukraine. At the very least, this would mean preventing Ukraine from losing any or at least much additional territory to the Russians while also ensuring that Russia eventually gives up its effort to try to conquer Ukraine AND DOES NOT TRY doing the same thing again sometime in the future. Would also be nice if Ukraine also had a say in its future choice of alliances, though I suspect that the West might enjoy seeing Russian bled dry in Ukraine and thus might unfortunately be hesitant to offer Ukraine even non-NATO security guarantees. :(

TBH it is a bad case of politicians and media obsessing about things without a sense of scale. I've seen many cases of people even bringing up Ukraine related stuff to blame for the current economic struggles, when in reality its not something that is even the right order of magnitude...
But what is?
Well guess what, politicians would rather have you wonder whether a strategic victory over Russia by proxy is worth it, rather than ponder upon their real fuckup with not even an arguable return on investment...
Every month of the economic shutdown has cost the U.S. economy $1.1 trillion, according to leading economists.
Yeah, you read that right, every month of lockdowns has cost about 28x that much. Every single month. If you want a real culprit for any macroeconomic problems, look for stuff with that kind of price tag. Its one hell of a distraction technique to shift the conversation to Ukraine related spending or Russia sanctions, which are almost pocket change on the scale of economic issues.
 
TBH it is a bad case of politicians and media obsessing about things without a sense of scale. I've seen many cases of people even bringing up Ukraine related stuff to blame for the current economic struggles, when in reality its not something that is even the right order of magnitude...
But what is?
Well guess what, politicians would rather have you wonder whether a strategic victory over Russia by proxy is worth it, rather than ponder upon their real fuckup with not even an arguable return on investment...

Yeah, you read that right, every month of lockdowns has cost about 28x that much. Every single month. If you want a real culprit for any macroeconomic problems, look for stuff with that kind of price tag. Its one hell of a distraction technique to shift the conversation to Ukraine related spending or Russia sanctions, which are almost pocket change on the scale of economic issues.

I'd be willing to do an end to the lockdowns in exchange for mandatory vaccinations for everyone. Does that sound fair?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top