Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

What are they gonna call Kiev, Lovov and every other city west of the Dneper getting turned into burned out craters, a draw?

"Well ACKSHUALLY Russia won because they mass-murdered tens of thousands of people!" is one hell of a fucking take.

And given how often shit in Russia is catching on fire, and Ukraine likely bringing Belgorod into long artillery range soon, I wouldn't lay good odds on it being all one-sided for long.
 
It's more than that. If they're veterans they're no longer fighting against an insurgency and instead facing a conventional force without their own existing air and artillery support they once had in their service.

True - but Moscov forces never fought modern army with artillery,too.
 
It was omething I saw in...I think it was a Locust Eater's podcast a month or so ago, maybe more.

They said that Putin was told by Trump he'd nuke Moscow if Putin made a move on Kyiv, and given Putin didn't do shit while Trump was in office, while Trump used similar threats on N. Korea...I find it plausible.

Why exactly would a US President who wanted to pull the US out of NATO be willing to risk nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine?
 
It's more than that. If they're veterans they're no longer fighting against an insurgency and instead facing a conventional force without their own existing air and artillery support they once had in their service.

Foreign volunteers are far more useful and impactful in terms of their knowledge than their direct combat contribution. I remember seeing a BBC documentary on UK citizens volunteering to fight with the Kurds against ISIS. They took one look at a particular UK volunteer - a veteran in his 40s - and asked him to forget about dragging his greying ass into high intensity infantry combat and instead help train young Kurdish soldiers on the Milan missile system. They had plenty of missiles supplied by NATO, but the bottleneck was in training new operators. When NATO trains other nations on how to use their weapons, they train not the final operators, but a batch of high-quality guys (officers with some intellect, esp. training officers/warrant officers etc.) to create a training cohort who's job is to train a bigger cohort of trainers while they also train actual end-users of the system. US veteran volunteers are training Ukrainians in the techniques and tactics required to get the most out of the Javelin missile system right now in Ukraine; there's a big WSJ article about it.

So the copenicks can jerk their pricks all day long about one (1) sniper leaving the AO after six weeks in high intensity combat (which means he's definitely due for some R&R,) because it doesn't actually reflect where the real impact of Western support lies. The West is helping Ukraine improve its armies' capabilities at-scale, not with a handful of "special forces" that are only good for propaganda purposes - like those Chechen clowns hipfiring while Aloha Snackbar'ing as their President does drunken livestreams and prays at gas stations in Chechnya or whatever bullshit he's doing now.
 
Why exactly would a US President who wanted to pull the US out of NATO be willing to risk nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine?
Because Trump knew how to deal with strongmen like Putin; they only respect strength and the will to use it.

Remember, it was also Trump who started providing lethal aid to Ukraine, over the objections of the Dems.
 
Because Trump knew how to deal with strongmen like Putin; they only respect strength and the will to use it.

Remember, it was also Trump who started providing lethal aid to Ukraine, over the objections of the Dems.

He also attempted to withhold this aid for political gain:

 
He also attempted to withhold this aid for political gain:

He withheld it to see if the Ukrainians would actually pay for the shit; they did, and the Javelin's started showing up pretty soon after that.
 
He also wanted the Ukrainians to investigate the Bidens for Burisma.
Yes, which he should have, given the grift and corruption connected to the Biden's and Burisma, as the shit on Hunter's laptop, and other evidence, has repeatedly proved.

Pelosi's kid also was part of it, which is why Pelosi pushed the impeachment hoax to cover up any investigations into the corruptions he kid was a part of.
 
"Well ACKSHUALLY Russia won because they mass-murdered tens of thousands of people!" is one hell of a fucking take.

And given how often shit in Russia is catching on fire, and Ukraine likely bringing Belgorod into long artillery range soon, I wouldn't lay good odds on it being all one-sided for long.

These are Russian nationalist Anatoly Karlin's thoughts on the Ukraine invasion:


I view it as a heroic and indeed deeply thymotic roll of the dice to determine whether Russia survives as an autonomous world-civilization pursuing a Cosmic destiny or fades into obscurancy, the twilight phrase of its abortive history.

5,000 deaths or 15,000 deaths or even 100,000 deaths is a modest price to pay for resolving this question sooner rather later.

If it loses, and ends up under either the Western Supremacist or the Chinese yoke if it comes to that, is quite irrelevant. The precise fates of losers are irrelevant and uninteresting in principle. For my own part, I will simply transfer over my allegiance to either the Celestial Empire or the dharmic cause, whichever I judge has the higher chance of smashing Western Supremacism, the prime adversary of all humanity.

I'd be willing to take his claims much more seriously if he himself was personally willing to fight in Ukraine. The idea that it's somehow absolutely crucial whether Russia has 145 million or 180 million people is downright bizarre. By that logic, all that makes the difference between permanent chronic decline and permanent superpowerdom for the US is whether the US successfully manages to conquer Canada, Australia, and New Zealand and their combined 70 million people!
 
Foreign volunteers are far more useful and impactful in terms of their knowledge than their direct combat contribution. I remember seeing a BBC documentary on UK citizens volunteering to fight with the Kurds against ISIS. They took one look at a particular UK volunteer - a veteran in his 40s - and asked him to forget about dragging his greying ass into high intensity infantry combat and instead help train young Kurdish soldiers on the Milan missile system. They had plenty of missiles supplied by NATO, but the bottleneck was in training new operators. When NATO trains other nations on how to use their weapons, they train not the final operators, but a batch of high-quality guys (officers with some intellect, esp. training officers/warrant officers etc.) to create a training cohort who's job is to train a bigger cohort of trainers while they also train actual end-users of the system. US veteran volunteers are training Ukrainians in the techniques and tactics required to get the most out of the Javelin missile system right now in Ukraine; there's a big WSJ article about it.

So the copenicks can jerk their pricks all day long about one (1) sniper leaving the AO after six weeks in high intensity combat (which means he's definitely due for some R&R,) because it doesn't actually reflect where the real impact of Western support lies. The West is helping Ukraine improve its armies' capabilities at-scale, not with a handful of "special forces" that are only good for propaganda purposes - like those Chechen clowns hipfiring while Aloha Snackbar'ing as their President does drunken livestreams and prays at gas stations in Chechnya or whatever bullshit he's doing now.
It does help a lot when governments get fully involved to train them they can train over the border.

The social media reliant veterans I am doubtful of but they're some very fool hardy ones that are eager to get back into the fight after getting a faceful of shrapnel.

 

Trump seemed pretty serious about withdrawing, though:



Yes, which he should have, given the grift and corruption connected to the Biden's and Burisma, as the shit on Hunter's laptop, and other evidence, has repeatedly proved.

Pelosi's kid also was part of it, which is why Pelosi pushed the impeachment hoax to cover up any investigations into the corruptions he kid was a part of.

Which Pelosi kid? Alexandra?
 
Foreign volunteers are far more useful and impactful in terms of their knowledge than their direct combat contribution.
Let's be realistic, they're glorified bait to create pro-intervention propaganda for domestic consumption. “Russia killed ________ citizens, we must retaliate!” Thing is, we’d prefer the entire crowd of marvel-brained nitwits get themselves killed than start a nuclear apocalypse which would kill us.
 
Let's be realistic, they're glorified bait to create pro-intervention propaganda for domestic consumption. “Russia killed ________ citizens, we must retaliate!” Thing is, we’d prefer the entire crowd of marvel-brained nitwits get themselves killed than start a nuclear apocalypse which would kill us.

I couldn't agree MORE !
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top