Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Except for the Sietch...I haven't heard a lot of people (where I live) about the situation...Did something big or important happen besides the Istanbul talks?
 
Chiron said:
We can now throw Oryx's work in the trash. He has failed repeated requests to validate his work.
Click to expand...

Everything on his list is linked to photographic evidence of the losses. It's already validated. Why is his "failure" to validate an already validated thing disqualifying? Shouldn't these Kremlin-cum-gargling shills be able to debunk it? Oh, right, of fucking course they can't.

Chiron said:
On why he has so much passion on this. Read his words and then look at Zachowon in a new light for the real danger he actually represents.
Click to expand...

Your cognitive dissonance is not our danger.

Agent23 said:
But what if the enemy has ATGMs.
Click to expand...

Then they're going to use the thermal sights on their ATGM to scan the rest of the convoy as it passes and engage priority targets. That's the whole fucking point of putting direct fire on the enemy or using command-detonated mines instead of just laying mines in the road and fucking off.

I request Russia send us some shills with two IQ points to rub together because this is getting tedious.

Battlegrinder said:
Ok, and all of that could very well be true. But I must point out that this argument has gone from "duh, you should totally put a minivan as the unit in your supply convoy because it's cheap and expendable, just like how I always use Miranda class ships as my lead units instead of Galaxies in STA III" to "well yes obviously putting the minivan out front is a bad idea, but maybe they had to do that/actually didn't do that/whatever" in the course of like an hour of discussion.
Click to expand...

As expected of Russians, even their goalposts are motorized. 😏
 
planefag said:
Everything on his list is linked to photographic evidence of the losses. It's already validated. Why is his "failure" to validate an already validated thing disqualifying? Shouldn't these Kremlin-cum-gargling shills be able to debunk it? Oh, right, of fucking course they can't.



Your cognitive dissonance is not our danger.



Then they're going to use the thermal sights on their ATGM to scan the rest of the convoy as it passes and engage priority targets. That's the whole fucking point of putting direct fire on the enemy or using command-detonated mines instead of just laying mines in the road and fucking off.

I request Russia send us some shills with two IQ points to rub together because this is getting tedious.



As expected of Russians, even their goalposts are motorized. 😏
Click to expand...
You see he is thinking they will Ambush the Russians like the middle east did to Americans. Just go for anything.

Where as in conventional you wait for the right time to do a proper ambush
 
sillygoose said:
Ukraine has too. This isn't a one sided affair. But if Ukraine wants to end the war they need to take the chance. Continuing it will not help Ukraine or result in a better outcome.
Click to expand...
I mean Ukraone won't trust it but Obey it
 
sillygoose said:
Ukraine has too. This isn't a one sided affair. But if Ukraine wants to end the war they need to take the chance. Continuing it will not help Ukraine or result in a better outcome.
Click to expand...
Ukraine has defended themselves when fired upon during cease fire's, yes.

But for the obvious reason of cease fire's ceasing when one side fires on the other, that doesn't matter.
 
Zachowon said:
Drones that we know of today are not the same as those in the past.

They are nothing alike
Click to expand...
Conceptually a modern drone is a really fancy 5 or 6 channel RC plane with an autopilot, GPS receiver, onboard computer, and internet connection.

rudder, elevator, ailerons, motor, Aux 1, and Aux 2. Aux1 is landing gear. Aux2 is flaps.
 
bintananth said:
Conceptually a modern drone is a really fancy 5 or 6 channel RC plane with an autopilot, GPS receiver, onboard computer, and internet connection.

rudder, elevator, ailerons, motor, Aux 1, and Aux 2. Aux1 is landing gear. Aux2 is flaps.
Click to expand...
A lot more then that for any sort of UCAV
 
bintananth said:
Conceptually a modern drone is a really fancy 5 or 6 channel RC plane with an autopilot, GPS receiver, onboard computer, and internet connection.

rudder, elevator, ailerons, motor, Aux 1, and Aux 2. Aux1 is landing gear. Aux2 is flaps.
Click to expand...
Plus sensors, weapon systems, potentially EW capabilities... I mean, conceptually an aircraft carrier and a bireme are both just boats. (Anyone who argues over semantics of ship vs boat will be sent to fight in Ukraine.)
 
Agent23 said:
Um, drones are basically 50s level of tech aside for the fact that they are pilot-less and have some improved guidance tech.
Click to expand...
Plus sensors, IT, weapons and material technology that would make any 50s engineer lose their shit. But, if you're going to downplay that hard, I mean the Wright flyer went up in 1903 so really every airforce are using basically 1900's level tech with just a few improvements and improved tech. :rolleyes:
 
Megadeath said:
Plus sensors, IT, weapons and material technology that would make any 50s engineer lose their shit. But, if you're going to downplay that hard, I mean the Wright flyer went up in 1903 so really every airforce are using basically 1900's level tech with just a few improvements and improved tech. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
No jet engine, no stealth, travels at speeds that would be considered a joke, can easily be taken out by first world militaries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top