Floridaman
Well-known member
yeah those things he did are standard, also the chemical weapons were given to him by us. So if we didn’t intervene in the beginning that wouldn’t have happened.I suspect that the million dead Iraqis is an exaggeration and in any case, Iraq could have been in an even worse shape right now during the Arab Spring had we not ousted Saddam. And wasn't Saddam unusually brutal for a Middle Eastern dictator, such as with him using chemical weapons against the Kurds and brutally crushing the Iraqi Shi'ites and draining their mashes afterwards?
As for what I would consider a failure in Iraq, a total ISIS takeover of the country would be a pretty good example of this. And Iraq is trying to balance Iran and the US against each other rather than being a total Iranian client state. There's some resentment in Iraq against the pro-Iranian Shi'ite militias for crushing protesters during the 2019 demonstrations there.
as for your maybe it could have been worse, I would point out that the Arab spring was another regime change backed by us and europe so again if that made it worse that is also our fault.
Finally the claim well maybe things could have been worse, so we shouldn’t class Iraq as a failure is nuts. That is like me saying Hitler and the Nazis were good for humanity because without ww2 the soviets would have invaded the world..... only with my scenario we at least get a good video game franchise.