AnimalNoodles
Well-known member
/le sigh
how about this then?
how about this then?
I see a bunch of pictures of similar looking men/a man, in locations/times not in the shooting vid./le sigh
how about this then?
If he is it'll get worse they call his opponent "the Anifta Mayor" so yeah Portland is screwed.So he will be out on his ass during the next election or will he still be voted for?
Because BLM demands total submission to their race. Whites are devils who need to get worked to death while the minorities enjoy the fruits of their labors.....Why are they even doing that?
In other news BLM has organised a million people march over in London today based on the idea of defunding the police etc.
I'm not sure how the police will cope with these numbers
Less than nothing. The british empire funded a campaign to end slavery as it was known. The costs were so high, tax-payers only recently managed to pay it all off, in 2016 or so.What the hell does the UK even have to do with BLM?
....Why are they even doing that?
edit: I am also not seeing 1 million peoples here?
What the hell does the UK even have to do with BLM?
There are A LOT of laws that prevent federal forces form being used on American soil. There has to be a lot of steps in between to allow mobilization, let alone drone strikes.
technically that isn’t true, groups can be declared criminal during ww2 we did it with the American branch of the Nazi party. This was also used on the German one by the way during the occupation.There's also free speech and association laws -- even if a group is declared to be a gang or domestic terrorist organization, you *cannot* be convicted of a crime, much less summarily executed, for merely talking about them or wearing a logo. At the point where you've gone this far, you've decided to destroy the Constitution.
Those Communist bastardsTim Pool is also saying he had a Blue Lives Matter patch on, so yeah...
Technically there are states where you can be arrested for gang affiliation. I know this as when I was a jailer you could add charges if someone was in a gang and had tattoos associated with a gang. You can definitely add charges for it. You can definitely charge for it if you need a reason for a warrant. Will it hold up? Maybe not, but if there is evidence to help support it you can.There's also free speech and association laws -- even if a group is declared to be a gang or domestic terrorist organization, you *cannot* be convicted of a crime, much less summarily executed, for merely talking about them or wearing a logo. At the point where you've gone this far, you've decided to destroy the Constitution.
The US can do a lottechnically that isn’t true, groups can be declared criminal during ww2 we did it with the American branch of the Nazi party. This was also used on the German one by the way during the occupation.
This dude is still very much alive; the PPD reported someone killed.
This is a separate incident, unless the PPD was incorrect in their assessment of the victims condition.
technically that isn’t true, groups can be declared criminal during ww2 we did it with the American branch of the Nazi party. This was also used on the German one by the way during the occupation.
Technically there are states where you can be arrested for gang affiliation.
If he is it'll get worse they call his opponent "the Anifta Mayor" so yeah Portland is screwed.
All true.
Yet air strikes were considered when the Killdozer/Marvin Heemeyer tore Granby a new one. And he wasn't even a terrorist, and the only life he took, despite having ample means and oppurutinity, was his own.
So it's not without precedent.
Arresting them and then charging them with further crimes they have been caught committing is just fineMinor point of correction: it's Portland Police Bureau, not Police Department. In Portland, all city departments are "Bureaus".
I didn't say you can't declare a group to be criminal; I said you cannot Constitutionally criminalize mere peripheral association with a group. The closest things come to that is enhanced sentencing for gang associations, and that still requires an *actual crime to be committed*.
You can be arrested for suspected gang affiliation; you cannot be convicted of a crime for gang affiliation alone, and outside of overly aggressive gang task force actions, merely wearing a logo or expressing a positive opinion of a gang does not constitute affiliation.
Who is "they"? I've never heard ANYONE call her that, much less a universal "they", and I live here. This strikes me as an unprovably vague claim, in any case.
Arresting them and then charging them with further crimes they have been caught committing is just fine
Arrest them and try them using the countless hundreds of hours of footageIf they have been caught committing actual crimes, is my entire point. As opposed to the assertion I was responding to, which was that anyone wearing so much as a BLM logo should be summarily executed.
Arrest them and try them using the countless hundreds of hours of footage