True, but also misleading. ALL soldiers go through training, not all soldiers go to war. Rate is higher for the soldiers in war.Mire US Soldiers died in training then in the middle east
True, but also misleading. ALL soldiers go through training, not all soldiers go to war. Rate is higher for the soldiers in war.Mire US Soldiers died in training then in the middle east
that's a nice thought, but the tools of war generate risk...ESPECIALLY when you use them.Generally speaking, hazard is supposed to come from the enemy.
I won't speak for others, but I am fully aware of this. I am not saying non-nuclear WW3 is impossible; but neither do I think it's impossible to avoid, especially in a timeframe of the next 50 years. There is a space in between those two options, you know.World war 3 can invovle combat in a non nuclear state between nuclear states. And that is what they don't understand
lol, Noodles gave the game away by bringing up radiation when no one else did. You need to update your talking point flowchart, or at least pay enough attention to realize when things are going off script.Its not the radiation, ITS THE HEAVY METAL POISONING. Care to look up what that does? Dont. It will haunt you. And unlike a flooded river the effects will last centuries. But thats okay as long as we get to kill some Russians huh? The Rainbow Empire accepts no limits on its escalation.
I mean, as an ideal, sure. But practically speaking there's just boat loads of hazard generated by a soldier's own side. Back blast from a rocket launch, friendly fire, improperly marked or communicated mine fields, some rando trooper digging a defensive ditch you didn't expect on your night time patrol, the guy in your enclosed fox hole with a three pack a day habit, Bob the bungler who's improper maintenance produced a slipping gear in his m203.Generally speaking, hazard is supposed to come from the enemy.
Yes, but the rate is still staggering how many die in training from things that should not have happend, but still did even eith proper safetyTrue, but also misleading. ALL soldiers go through training, not all soldiers go to war. Rate is higher for the soldiers in war.
2030 will be either when or after the next world warI won't speak for others, but I am fully aware of this. I am not saying non-nuclear WW3 is impossible; but neither do I think it's impossible to avoid, especially in a timeframe of the next 50 years. There is a space in between those two options, you know.
lol, Noodles gave the game away by bringing up radiation when no one else did. You need to update your talking point flowchart, or at least pay enough attention to realize when things are going off script.
P.S. Iron harvest.
Thank you for your courage with such a concrete prediction. And conveniently for everyone it's a short time frame. What will you reevaluate, epistemologically, if the world-shaking cataclysm you were so certain would happen does not come to pass?2030 will be either when or after the next world war
I know it's not actually incorrect usage, and I can just about get my head around it but the exclusionary triple negative at the end there really does my head in. There's gotta be a better way to phrase that?Thank you for your courage with such a concrete prediction. And conveniently for everyone it's a short time frame. What will you reevaluate, epistemologically, if the world-shaking cataclysm you were so certain would happen does not come to pass?
As for me, I think the odds are pretty low, but non-zero, that a world war will happen by or before then. I presume you believe it will involve a US-China conflict. I would go so far as to say I'm certain there won't be a non-nuclear world war before 2030 that doesn't revolve around that.
The Russians have endless reserves of the most ecologically conscious and more importantly sustainably sourced main gun tank ammunition in the world, carefully removed from environmentally secured long term storage and transported to the front in a stringently professional and ethical manner. And unless Ukraine surrenders immediately it will all be unleashed in a responsible and surgical manner upon their lands!
Considering everything else in McDonalds' foodstuffs, providing that food to people in war should be considered a war crime.Well, given the amount of salt in McDonalds' foodstuffs, I guess they could be considered "preserved rations", lol.
I am just confident in my opinion based off what I see on my jobThank you for your courage with such a concrete prediction. And conveniently for everyone it's a short time frame. What will you reevaluate, epistemologically, if the world-shaking cataclysm you were so certain would happen does not come to pass?
As for me, I think the odds are pretty low, but non-zero, that a world war will happen by or before then. I presume you believe it will involve a US-China conflict. I would go so far as to say I'm certain there won't be a non-nuclear world war before 2030 that doesn't revolve around that.
IIRC I've seen many photos of such storage from WWI and WWII by British army.not casually stacking them like lumber.
Well, their Cokes taste nice, as do their chocolate milkshakes; their fries are nice when fresh, and don't forget the ice-creams e.g. McFlurries.Considering everything else in McDonalds' foodstuffs, providing that food to people in war should be considered a war crime.
With great care - all salt go into tears of their workers and customers !Well, their Cokes taste nice, as do their chocolate milkshakes; their fries are nice when fresh, and don't forget the ice-creams e.g. McFlurries.
But yeah, I remember ordering a breakfast wrap from them a few years back, on the way to the hospital -- it was a tortilla wrap with bacon, sausage, and egg. Oh, and ketchup.
It was fucking flavourless. Seriously, I couldn't even taste the goddamn salt.
How do you remove the taste from fucking salt of all things?
this destroyed McDonalds.... it actually looks repairable.
But why would you?
Read again what I wrote. Issue is not that it is heavy metal penetrator. Issue is that it is penetrator made with heavy metal which essentially pulverizes itself when doing its work, and therefore presents a major environmental hazard.
When tungsten penetrator strikes a tank, it mostly remains in solid form. It is just a big lump of metal.
Issue is, soldiers often have to come close to said tanks:
Depleted uranium: Courts accept cancer risk denied by army
Courts across Europe have ruled that depleted uranium can cause cancer among troops. Yet the British army insists it is safe to supply Ukraine with the toxic tank shells.declassifieduk.orgIncidence of haematological malignancies in Kosovo—A post "uranium war" concern
During the Kosovo War (1998–99) approximately 31,000 rounds with Depleted Uranium (DU) were fired on 85 targets in Kosovo. The number of haematological malignancies (HM) increased after the war and the concern was the use of DU during the war. ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Russians have endless reserves of the most ecologically conscious and more importantly sustainably sourced main gun tank ammunition in the world, carefully removed from environmentally secured long term storage and transported to the front in a stringently professional and ethical manner. And unless Ukraine surrenders immediately it will all be unleashed in a responsible and surgical manner upon their lands!