Megadeath
Well-known member
You and I define "occupy" rather differently.Oh, so West is using the war as a golden opportunity to occupy Ukraine.
How shocking.
You and I define "occupy" rather differently.Oh, so West is using the war as a golden opportunity to occupy Ukraine.
How shocking.
You and I define "occupy" rather differently.
I didn't realize that democracy and de-oligarchization were bad things.
You and I define "occupy" rather differently.
If we look at what has happened in Croatia, "democracy and de-oligarchization" as well as the "civil society" etc. are nothing but code words for infiltration of the country by foreign oligarchs.
There is no democracy, no de-oligarchization, merely a replacement of one set of tyrannical oligarchs by another set. And that latter set is far worse because, being a caste of international magnates, they do not have even a passing concern for the country they are robbing and mutilating.
And democracy is a bad thing - modern democracy at least, and for multiple reasons:
Argument for Monarchy, Part 1 – Tyrannical Nature of Democracy
This started from posts by Libertus, but with expansion and commentary. Tyrannical nature of democracy Democracy is a self-destructive political system for several reasons. Democracy formalizes pol…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comArgument for Monarchy, Part 2 – Democracy as Failure of Human Nature
Democracy and professional psychopathy What is even more frightening than size of democratic government is the quality of the same. In democracy, politicians are under constant pressure to gain and…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comArgument for Monarchy, Part 3 – Issue of Centralization
Centralization of government has led to greatest evils in history. Going by demicides, it is exactly strong governments which caused greatest mass murders in history. Communism killed 107 mill…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comArgument for Monarchy, Part 4 – Cult of Democracy
Cult of democracy Democracy today – much like other modern things – is a cult. Democracy is perfect, and cannot be damaged by evidence. When society does well, it must be a result of democracy; but…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comThe Democracy Disease
“Bad is the dominion of the multitude” Homer, Illiad 2.204. Robert Bisset (1759-1805) was a Scottish writer who abhorred democracy and earned his conservative chops as the first biographer of Edmun…orthosphere.wordpress.comImmigration – How Democracy Leads to Demographic Replacement
Democracy is evil for many reasons, but important one is that it promotes a form of genocide known as population replacement. The Left claims that it supports mass immigration for various reasons. …politicalreactionary.wordpress.comLeftist Political Dominance as a Consequence of an Infantile Society
“A boy of fifteen who is not a democrat is good for nothing, and he is no better who is a democrat at twenty.” Problem is, even people of sixty are good for nothing today. Thanks to the…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comImportance of Subsidiarity
Introduction Subsidiarity is the principle which holds that issues should be solved at the most local or immediate level that is consistent with their resolution. Oxford lexicon defines it as ̶…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comBasic Tenets of Progressivism Are Wrong
Progressivism is a religion, and its foundation are the Seven Progressive Commandments, or else basic tenets. These were compiled at the Monkey House: Western Liberal Democracy is the only legitima…politicalreactionary.wordpress.comTolkien’s Ideal of Monarchy
JRR Tolkien’s love of monarchy is seen through his work. Last third of the Lord of the Rings has return of the King to Gondor, and restoration of the monarchy – and this is linked inexorably …politicalreactionary.wordpress.comWestern Europe Is A Tyrannical Dystopia
Western Europe is not a free society. In fact, it is a tyrannical, multicultural dystopia pretending to be a democracy, and this is obvious on both external and internal plan. European Parliament&#…politicalreactionary.wordpress.com
Occupation can have many forms.
You can argue for monarchy all you want, and I'll just point at basically all the documents the US's founding fathers wrote.
Croatia doesn't have population replacement.
Nor is Croatia that corrupt
You can argue for monarchy all you want, and I'll just point at basically all the documents the US's founding fathers wrote.
Sure. Coz word's can mean whatever you'd like them to. I thought it was the silly, evil lefty types who were supposed to redefine words to suit themselves?Occupation can have many forms.
Sure. Coz word's can mean whatever you'd like them to. I thought it was the silly, evil lefty types who were supposed to redefine words to suit themselves?
No, but they were certainly correct about monarchs and aristocracy. One should not rule over others based on accident of birth, and I'm really not a fan of protected classes. This is why SJWs earn my ire as well. It's frankly the same attitude of being better than and above others.Yeah, because they were gods and thus automatically correct about everything.
Unless you want me to dismissively mock you about wanting to poop in a hole and died of a bacterial infection, you might want to define just what it is you mean by "modernity."For what it's worth, I think modernity is actually the real problem, not necessarily democracy as such.
No, but they were certainly correct about monarchs and aristocracy. One should not rule over others based on accident of birth, and I'm really not a fan of protected classes. This is why SJWs earn my ire as well. It's frankly the same attitude of being better than and above others.
Unless you want me to dismissively mock you about wanting to poop in a hole and died of a bacterial infection, you might want to define just what it is you mean by "modernity."
The representative Republican system that they came up with. The problem with our system is that it has become corrupted, not that it is a Republic. Frankly, I see little difference between the unaccountable protected class that has taken root within our system and a system with monarchy.Question: what is the alternative?
Because frankly, "rule by accident" is the best damn political system we can come up with.
I can't say that I agree with either your definition (which is not very concise), nor your rose-tinted interpretation of the past.Powerful state, first and foremost. Modern-day ideologies that have begun with the French revolution and then continued further into the rabbit hole - especially various types of socialism. Inescapable mass media, high levels of urbanization, disappearance of the rural peasantry that actually works on land for the living.
Way to miss the point. Yeah, my ancestors pooped in holes, too. Doesn't mean I want to.Also, my grandparents on maternal side did that whole "poop in a hole" thing - they didn't actually have a toilet, or a bathroom (they did have a shower - which was a massive metallic barrel with a pipe, riveted to the side of the house). They didn't die of bacterial infection - rather, both died of cancer (both were heavy smokers, and grandfather also worked as a painter, so...).
The representative Republican system that they came up with. The problem with our system is that it has become corrupted, not that it is a Republic. Frankly, I see little difference between the unaccountable protected class that has taken root within our system and a system with monarchy.
I can't say that I agree with either your definition (which is not very concise), nor your rose-tinted interpretation of the past.
And I would say look in a mirror. But take those rose-tinted glasses off first.That is because you lack the knowledge of monarchy.
My interpretation of the past is hardly any more rose-tinted than your interpretation of the present. But to each their own, I guess.
And I would say look in a mirror. But take those rose-tinted glasses off first.
Uh, yeah, and that makes them fucking monsters. People with Down syndrome can still lead productive, happy lives and an increasing number of them do just that as treatments improve (with modern medicine someone with Down's can reasonably expect to live to 60, for instance) - it's not an immediately and incurably fatal birth defect like anencephaly. It's not for nothing that the casualness with which countries like Iceland have exterminated their populace with Down's in the womb has become a talking point in pro-life circles.
For all that eugenics is associated with racial supremacy, not even poor whites (who weren't Italian, Irish, or any other sort of 'white ethnic' - they were WASPs who just happened to be born into poverty in the wrong state) were spared. The Carrie Buck mentioned in that article wasn't any sort of 'white ethnic' and was the plaintiff for a case considered to be one of the worst SCOTUS ever handled, right up there with Dred Scott and Korematsu.
Eugenics is a road straight to hell. Inevitably it leads to the conclusion that human life has no innate worth (certain lives being inherently worth more than others is usually just the stepping stone before this conclusion) and those who are unworthy for one reason or another deserve no respect, therefore they can be screwed over or outright snuffed out for the 'greater good' of society's worthies; and these categories are clearly and consistently very flexible & easily expanded ones as has been demonstrated by eugenicists across states, countries and history.
Funny thing, WaPo of all places allowed a negative piece about this very matter a few years ago. Other ghastly extermination-by-abortion stats mentioned in that article include a 90% rate in the UK and 98% in Denmark.If true, then that’s both alarming and appalling in equal measure.
That said, I don’t suppose you have any sources on Iceland specifically? For obvious reasons, I assume it’s not a story NYT or MSNBC would break — or if they did, odds are they’d waffle and obfuscate when it comes to explaining why Iceland has no Down’s Syndrome. Seriously, that sounds like something Hitler might’ve tried, considering that aborting those with birth defects preemptively isn’t that much of a step up from the Reich’s T4 Program and other eugenicist cruelty of the sort.
The Carrie Buck mentioned in that article wasn't any sort of 'white ethnic' and was the plaintiff for a case considered to be one of the worst SCOTUS ever handled, right up there with Dred Scott and Korematsu.
Question: what is the alternative?
Because frankly, "rule by accident" is the best damn political system we can come up with.
We do. We are only in the very beginning stages of it.