Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Yeah.
Military get it when heading to korea or middle east, basically anywhere it could be used as a weapon.
Same with Anthrax

Yes, but the military mandated the use of the anthrax vaccine even though that was actually an experimental vaccine at the time, and the use of it "only when deploying to risk areas" was a policy change that happened only because the manufacturer wasn't able to deliver enough vaccine to continue the original policy which was mandatory full vaccination service--wide.
 
Yes, but the military mandated the use of the anthrax vaccine even though that was actually an experimental vaccine at the time, and the use of it "only when deploying to risk areas" was a policy change that happened only because the manufacturer wasn't able to deliver enough vaccine to continue the original policy which was mandatory full vaccination service--wide.
Not it is for all FORSCOM
 
And with smallpox, it was justified as smallpox was something that had no other truly effective treatment except vaccination and it did save millions of lives from a disease that had ravaged humanity for thousands of years.
Sure. But I think the point being made is that contrary to what you said:
If a bug is bad enough to justify it, the vax safe enough, and you can prove this to the public, people won't *need* to be coerced to get a vax against a disease like that.
if you forget for a second about the specific case of COVID where you think mandatory vaccination is not justified, history shows that when mandatory vaccination is justified, the mere fact of said justification being publicly available is not always enough to convince people to get said vaccine.
 
Like literally dozens if not hundreds of SUVs are being donated to Ukraine.








ZOMG Convoys of Luxury SUVs being imported for Billionaires to Joyride around in a warzone instead of the three thousand Abrams tanks Biden promised!!!!1

Putin Please Bomb Us! I'm outraged!


I thought ever victorious Ukraine was flush in vehicles siezed from the fleeing Russians?
 
I thought ever victorious Ukraine was flush in vehicles siezed from the fleeing Russians?

Well there you go thinking again...

strawman-argument.jpg
 
Yeah, I mean im told the russians are losing, yet they are advancing, im told the ukrainians are full of NATO wonderwaffe and captured Russian equipment and are winning winning winng, yet they are forced to beg for civilian vehicles to move supplies and convert into technicals.

There you go thinking again. Who exactly told you this because it wasn't me yet you quoted me when I was discussing something completely unrelated. 🤔
 
Yeah, I mean im told the russians are losing, yet they are advancing, im told the ukrainians are full of NATO wonderwaffe and captured Russian equipment and are winning winning winng, yet they are forced to beg for civilian vehicles to move supplies and convert into technicals.
Because civilian vehicles and all of this are being sent to support the ever growing amount if troops the Ukrainaisna re getting.
Much more tjem the Ruskies
 
That's even worse.
The US doesn't even have any Mothballed M60s for Active duty.
Only few Guard units still have a few mothballed M60s that have never seen maintenance since.
We still have M1A1s and M1s before we go M60s
I know the Colorado Dept of Transportation actually has at least 1 M60 it uses for avalanche control work in the San Juans.

It's a lot nicer working conditions than backpacking charges in, and cheaper than dropping them from a helo.
 
That's even worse.
The US doesn't even have any Mothballed M60s for Active duty.
Only few Guard units still have a few mothballed M60s that have never seen maintenance since.
We still have M1A1s and M1s before we go M60s

We were still using M60's in desert storm, The modernized versions are still pretty good tanks.
 
We were still using M60's in desert storm, The modernized versions are still pretty good tanks.
Turkey does make a pretty awesome upgraded version that is probably better than the Abram's for urban fighting, with the 25mm secondary turret giving it a way to clear rooms or take out light vehicle's without needing a main gun round or burning up a lot of machinegun ammo.
 
Turkey does make a pretty awesome upgraded version that is probably better than the Abram's for urban fighting, with the 25mm secondary turret giving it a way to clear rooms or take out light vehicle's without needing a main gun round or burning up a lot of machinegun ammo.


There was also this proposed version back in the day, Although the Sabra is probably better.

pq6G1Hb.jpg
 
Because civilian vehicles and all of this are being sent to support the ever growing amount if troops the Ukrainaisna re getting.
Much more tjem the Ruskies
The problem is what the Ukrainians need is SPAAGs and air power; the Donbas is getting hammered because they have no AA protection at the moment.

They need those Polish MiGs, and they need them yesterday.
 
Those MiGs would be too little. They would also need a full air defense network to back them up as their exiting ADS got badly attritted. And even that wouldn't turn the tide in Donbass as the biggest killer there is artillery, while Ukrainian artillery is still strong enough to take a toll, the Russian artillery still outguns them by several orders of magnitude and the catch is that between their stocks and production, the Russians can keep up their artillery ammo consumption indefinitely, while Ukrainian depots are getting depleted and the NATO stocks and production just can't keep up.
Another factor is that while every time Russians replace a frontline unit, sure it is good to celebrate it on the internet as glorious Ukrainian victory, but the cruel reality is that while Russia can afford to pull units off the frontline for R&R, Ukraine can't. Shattered platoons and companies are amalgamated into scratch units and continue their service on the frontline without break, worn out survivors waiting for their turn to be torn apart by artillery, just like their comrades before them.
 
between their stocks and production, the Russians can keep up their artillery ammo consumption indefinitely, while Ukrainian depots are getting depleted and the NATO stocks and production just can't keep up.
Could you elaborate on Russia's ammo production being more than all of NATO?
 
I know the Colorado Dept of Transportation actually has at least 1 M60 it uses for avalanche control work in the San Juans.

It's a lot nicer working conditions than backpacking charges in, and cheaper than dropping them from a helo.
Makes sense.
We were still using M60's in desert storm, The modernized versions are still pretty good tanks.
M60s were used by Marines then, and the M60 has been fully replaced by all forces with a few NG units still having them
The A3 TTP and the A1 Rise are also good modern updatedvarients of the M60.
More comparable to a T72 then a T62 though.
Turkey does make a pretty awesome upgraded version that is probably better than the Abram's for urban fighting, with the 25mm secondary turret giving it a way to clear rooms or take out light vehicle's without needing a main gun round or burning up a lot of machinegun ammo.
Eh, the 25mm isn't always the best, when the Abrams has 3 machine guns one being a 50
 
I can't find the article anymore but there was a mention some years ago that russian peacetime production of artillery rounds from 120-152 mm outstripped production of artillery ammo in NATO countries from 105 to 155 mm by four times (don't know about rockets). Russia also still has considerable stockpiles, despite number of depots exploding and disposing of much of improperly stored ammo, while stockpiles in NATO countries are minuscule.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top