Russian Invasion of Ukraine 2022

Well that and right now this is a war of propaganda, expecting to get actual information is like checking 4chan and expecting a good idea, there are some there, but it is an ocean of sewage.
Both side also seems to have some Opsec, unlike most conflict in recent years.
 
The one positive thing about this Russian invasion might be that Stepan Bandera statues will likely soon be coming down throughout all of Ukraine. :)

Amen.Pity,that Putin would replace it with some soviet butchers.Althought...those who survived gestapo and was taken by soviets told,that they were worst - but even soviets do not personally tortured children to death.UPA did so.

P.S it would be nice,if UPA and soviet lovers killed each other.
ON ANOTHER TOPIC - did anybody knew what kgbstan really take except Charnobyl? for now,we have propaganda on both sides.
 
We have yet to see the proof of that.

Of course, the Russians also have to win the occupation as well.

Yep, absolutely. Let's see just how much of a resistance, either active or semi-passive (think Solidarity in Poland in the 1980s), the Ukrainians will subsequently put up under Russian occupation.

Anyway, it's quite interesting. Russia has been on a roll over the last 25 years:

2000s: Defeated the Chechen separatists
2008: Crushed Georgia
2014: Annexed Crimea and saved the Donbass separatists from total destruction
2016: Got Donald Trump elected US President
2022: Invaded Ukraine and will likely overthrow the existing Ukrainian government
 
Amen.Pity,that Putin would replace it with some soviet butchers.Althought...those who survived gestapo and was taken by soviets told,that they were worst - but even soviets do not personally tortured children to death.UPA did so.

P.S it would be nice,if UPA and soviet lovers killed each other.

AFAIK, Putin is more of a Tsarist lover than a Soviet lover. He actually dislikes Lenin for giving Ukrainians and other peoples the nominal right of secession:

 
Beyond cnn saying so 2016 wasn’t a win for Russia, they got an unpredictable man who crippled their budget for a few years with sanctions.... during a time of falling oil prices.

Perceptions matter more than reality, as they will in 2024.

But they won and that is all that matters. You can say XYZ, but at the end of the day, Putin is drinking your wine, eating your food, smoking your cigars, and screwing your mistress, all while flipping you off.

Also the Taliban say hi.



A game of Chicken that was irrelevant and Russia wound up winning anyway. Same thing when they had a hot spat with Turkey in Syria as well. Cause while everyone gushed at all the gear Turkish Drones were taking out, the Russian backed Syrian Forces kept all their gains.

Interestingly enough, both Putin and Assad understand the demographic game very well. Putin will be absolutely delighted if millions of pro-Western Ukrainians will emigrate since that means less potential subversives within Ukraine. Ditto for Assad in regards to Syrian Sunni Arabs, whom he is not welcoming back into Syria if they have already fled:

 
No it's not? We're talking about whether Russia is a direct threat to the west, right? What does it matter if they won a few symbolic invasions against very incapable foes, by carpet bombing everything in sight? What meaning does this carry in regards to Russia threatening the West?

And I not American.

The West is much stronger than Russia (excluding nukes), but only if it is united and is actually willing to fight. Nowadays, the West appears to be full of war-weariness.

 
I wish to knew,why they taken Czarnobyl.There is nothing except radiation there.And if something happen,they would be blamed.
Well,maybe really thera are mutants there :unsure:

Maybe they want to study its effects over the last 36 years? Just a guess, though.
 
The West is much stronger than Russia (excluding nukes), but only if it is united and is actually willing to fight. Nowadays, the West appears to be full of war-weariness.

I'm not disputing that, but there's a difference between being war-weary of drawn-out occupations half the world away for some vague strategic goal nobody can even articulate properly (at least from the POV of the population) and defending your own borders or backyard from an invasion force.
 
I'm not disputing that, but there's a difference between being war-weary of drawn-out occupations half the world away for some vague strategic goal nobody can even articulate properly (at least from the POV of the population) and defending your own borders or backyard from an invasion force.

Well, the West isn't willing to fight for Ukraine. That's all that matters to Putin for the time being.
 
I wish to knew,why they taken Czarnobyl.There is nothing except radiation there.And if something happen,they would be blamed.
Well,maybe really thera are mutants there :unsure:
Because they need to take all territory in the route to kiev from Belarus, otherwise if they have troops in and around Chernobyl then they can attack behind the lines.
 
In a straight up conventional war the US military even in its current state will absolutely wreck any potential adversary, Pointing towards things like Afganistan in that regard is being disingenuous in regards to its capabilities at a stand up fight.
Provided the US throws enough resources but it's the US that has to mostly flip it all from afar. And the likes of Russia or China are close by and don't have to lean out, they just have to throw the Americans out. The whole US Doctrine is expensive as hell, while Russia goes for a rather more rational Cost/Effect ratio. It is no longer the USSR which can afford deep operations, it is a country with demography destroyed by communism.
Frankly speaking, Ukrainians can afford losses and protracted war even more than Russia.

Because it's honestly no art to develop a plan for a quiet year or so, then bomb your target to hell because you do. After all, the Russians were playing with the West's noses all the time until they suddenly attacked Ukraine. Surprising almost everyone. And we still don't know what the hell they're talking about, because I don't really believe Putin's gibberish.
 
I'm legit surprised by the level of discipline displayed by the Russian soldiers towards civilians given that they are conscripts.
Did you know it's not hard at all to get discipline into your heads? And especially with the world watching, they can't afford to make stupid mistakes. If he pulls some stupid stunt, they'll probably make an example out of him why it's forbidden to do that.
 
Provided the US throws enough resources but it's the US that has to mostly flip it all from afar. And the likes of Russia or China are close by and don't have to lean out, they just have to throw the Americans out. The whole US Doctrine is expensive as hell, while Russia goes for a rather more rational Cost/Effect ratio. It is no longer the USSR which can afford deep operations, it is a country with demography destroyed by communism.
Frankly speaking, Ukrainians can afford losses and protracted war even more than Russia.

Because it's honestly no art to develop a plan for a quiet year or so, then bomb your target to hell because you do. After all, the Russians were playing with the West's noses all the time until they suddenly attacked Ukraine. Surprising almost everyone. And we still don't know what the hell they're talking about, because I don't really believe Putin's gibberish.
If you mean his justification he is leaning on the fact that groups like the azov battalion a group of neo nazis that are actually connected with atom-waffen had a role in the 2014 revolution/coup and went from being a militia group to an official part of the national guard to claim that by invading he is denzaifying Ukraine. He is playing to his people’s memory of ww2 while mocking our idiots who see hitler under every bed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top