Given there are reports the first retalitory strike used one:
I find that the ideas they weren't available to be kinda sus, and more kneejerk defense of military decisions on your part.
You also don't seem to have anything to say about it possibly being our own allies that were hit.
You think we just have those sitting there where those drones are stationed ready to be put on? They would be special requested way ahead.
Because, you can not be 100 percent sure when you pull out so much if your intel infrastructure.Maybe if we’re not sure that we’re going to hit the enemy with the rockets, instead of uninvolved civilians, we shouldn’t fire the rockets?
Civilian casualties are a thing and are sometimes unavoidable, I get that. But I’d think that the US military could at least make sure they’re getting some actual terrorists in the strike instead of just uninvolved civilians.
A 9 civilians to 0 terrorists kill tally isn’t exactly what I’d call acceptable losses.
Blame this on thier ineptitude