Underestimating the lengths the Dems and their Uniparty allies in the establishment GOP will go to in order to hold onto power in perpetuity is part of why the last election could be stolen.
Have you considered, if you truly believe the election was "stolen" and that you have so much incontrovertible proof, you can bring suit yourself? It's kinda sad that seemingly the majority of posters truly believe the election was stolen and they have tons of "evidence" of it, that it's a terrible, maybe even mortal blow to America, but not one is willing to do more than repeat the same tired talking points in an echo chamber while patting each other on the back for being smart enough to see the "truth".
Better people than me have tried, with cases being brought pretty much continuously from Nov 3rd till Jan 6th, and are still trying, as evidenced by the ongoing audits in multiple states.
Tried... And failed! So, either everyone else trying is an idiot and they've missed litterally all the super damning and obvious evidence, the entire judiciary including members appointed by Trump is part of a vast and powerful conspiracy representing more than half the population and pretty much everyone in any position of power (And at that point it's not so much an evil conspiracy as the democratically expressed will of the people.), or the evidence isn't as strong as you think and doesn't show what you think.
The main problem I have is the courts didn’t even hear the cases but the biggest fly in the ointment to me was when several states broke their own voting laws and jack shit happened to them let’s just focus on that specific issue why didn’t the higher courts take that case there’s no getting around that they broke their own rules and laws but somehow their votes still counts why?
This really is the thing to focus on. All those other anomalies were fishy, and it's very suspicious that they all favored Biden..
Because in the couple of cases where it was a legit thing nobody cared until long after, when it was felt that the changes had hurt a preferred candidate. The changes states made to election laws weren't done the night before the election, or even a few weeks out. It was months before the election. It wasn't done in secret, it was widely known and publicised. Not one single person or group made any judicial complaint at the time it was actually necessary to do so. You can't just let a change slide, then call foul if it doesn't work out well for you.
Those changes make the process less secure, and need to be done with the consent of the people. In other words, by their elected representatives.
Potentially less secure, but there's no reason to believe there was any security issues, and plenty to believe there wasn't. Also, I never said it justified things, but since my argument is that the election wasn't stolen through cheating, the fact that some states broke their own laws about how to hold that election isn't really important unless you can show evidence (Which would make you the first!) that any potential security issues it created were actually exploited.
That's what the ongoing audits are for.
Cool, cool. So you'd be happy in the meantime to acknowledge that at present there is in fact no evidence of any kind of meaningful fraud, cheating or stealing of the election? I promise, if the audits do in fact turn up such evidence I'll be more than happy to acknowledge that in turn.
Not at all.
Not to mention shutting down counting centers for fake leaks, ballots showing up at 3am, mysterious 100% spikes for Biden when counting wasn't supposed to be happening, boarding up windows and not allowing observers, and the fact that dominion machines are stupid easy to manipulate.
That seems to be some chinese telephone game produced propaganda or other media shenanigans. I'm pretty sure you are referring to this one:
en.wikipedia.org
So, it wasn't Obama who said that, the airstrike wasn't even targeted at him, the reason why he died was that he happened to hang out in Yemen around AQ operatives who more likely than not were his dad's buddies. I'd say that hanging out within Hellfire blast radius of AQ operatives in Yemen dramatically increases one's chance of dying in a drone strike.
Thanks MardukThat seems to be some chinese telephone game produced propaganda or other media shenanigans. I'm pretty sure you are referring to this one:
Abdulrahman al-Awlaki - Wikipedia
So, it wasn't Obama who said that, the airstrike wasn't even targeted at him, the reason why he died was that he happened to hang out in Yemen around AQ operatives who more likely than not were his dad's buddies. I'd say that hanging out within Hellfire blast radius of AQ operatives in Yemen dramatically increases one's chance of dying in a drone strike.
The "fake address" claim was raised in a court case by Jesse Binnall, and found to be lacking in actual evidence. Also worth noting, most versions of that claim suggest that it was mail in votes that were effected, but the state could hardly send postal votes to people who don't exist, living at fake addresses, and if there wasn't valid voter registration the votes wouldn't count anyway.