• The Sietch will be brought offline for HPG systems maintenance tomorrow (Thursday, 2 May 2024). Please remain calm and do not start any interstellar wars while ComStar is busy. May the Peace of Blake be with you. Precentor Dune

China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

Vaermina

Well-known member
>Wikipedia

Can you at least TRY and make a point instead of acting like a living parody my guy?

The article reads like a complete character assassination. It repeats "with no proof" like a prayer mantra. And of course the cherry on top is how a bunch of the claims are correct, just not politically so like how children are at more risk from the vaxx than Covid or how the lock downs aren't effective.

"Yes he is a PHD who worked at Pfizer and helped develop many successful vaccines for other things. BUT IT'S ALL A LIE NONE OF IT IS TRUE STOP THINKING LOOK OUR JOURNALISTS HAVE DEBOONKED IT!"

Also fucking love how Wikipedia has changed "Anti-Vaxx" into "Vaccine Hesitancy". Don't think I haven't noticed you fuckers. Changing the term slowly to encompass anyone not 100% on board with everything.
No... He's an actually crazy anti-vaxer... As in he's going around claiming the vaccine turns you magnetic...

Which you would know if you had bothered to read the citations.

Also... You just directly lied... Multiple times... Because the article never said "with no proof", he wasn't a vaccine scientist, and didn't work at Pfizer developing vaccines...

So, don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you just lost any and all credibility in this thread.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
No... He's an actually crazy anti-vaxer... As in he's going around claiming the vaccine turns you magnetic...

Which you would know if you had bothered to read the citations.

Also... You just directly lied... Multiple times... Because the article never said "with no proof", he wasn't a vaccine scientist, and didn't work at Pfizer developing vaccines...

So, don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you just lost any and all credibility in this thread.

He served as the chief scientist and vice-president of Pfizer's allergy and respiratory research unit in Sandwich, Kent, where he oversaw the development of drugs for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Sorry, should have said "life saving medication" instead.

And it does say "with no proof" a bunch of times. Just as it says "without evidence" and "baseless". You know exactly what I meant, don't play dumb you dishonest retard. "Aha! You did not make a perfect 1-to-1 citation! You lose!"

I guess we should ignore everything then because of tbe one magnetic claim, which if you follow the link shows he said once citing a Luxenbourg study and does not make a main plataform of his. Almost like he mentions it as a way to find out more about it. Can't help but notice how you ignore the much more pressing claims with far more data to back it like the uselessness of extended lockdowns and such.

"Don't let the door hit you on the way out" Man fuck you, how about you do a somersault off a building and land face first on the concrete? It's so fucking annoying dealing with the likes of you. The exact same script all the time. "Deboonked! Acshually it was 9.73 not 9.75 so you are wrong! Well you made this one mistake on the quote so all of it can be ignored! What do you mean reading comprehension, you need to perfectly explain everything I am unable to understand meaning or infeer causalitt and meaning unless it is perfectly spelled out to me!"
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
The vaccine turned me magnetic, so that part seems to be true.
Yeah, it made me magnetic, it made me a chick magnet!


Jokes aside, @Vaermina said "So, don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you just lost any and all credibility in this thread."

Pretty sure he lost his credibility 300 pages ago but he's still here lol

Dude literally uses standards to discredit sources, that his own sources don't meet. We discussed this a few days ago.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Yeah, it made me magnetic, it made me a chick magnet!


Jokes aside, @Vaermina said "So, don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you just lost any and all credibility in this thread."

Pretty sure he lost his credibility 300 pages ago but he's still here lol

Dude literally uses standards to discredit sources, that his own sources don't meet. We discussed this a few days ago.


Oh yeah I remember that, his own sources can't handle his standards.
 

DarthOne

☦️
They never cared. They never actually learned the point. They are still good little Prussians deep down and unable to shake the autocratic mindset of "order must be preserved, order must be maintained".

Besides, wouldn't be the first time they have blatantly violated the Nuremberg Code and just gotten away with it. They experimented with children's mental health by putting them to live with pedophiles in the 80's and 90's and when people tried to get justice it was unironically excused as "oh those far right AfD are attacking LGBT people".
Leave the stereotypes out of it, thank you. It’s not like this sort of bullshit is unique to the Germans, historically or now.

And I’d blame the various degenerate and authoritarian left elements for both the pedo bullshit and this.
 

DarthOne

☦️
52TBtDu2NALw.jpeg
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
They never cared. They never actually learned the point. They are still good little Prussians deep down and unable to shake the autocratic mindset of "order must be preserved, order must be maintained".

Besides, wouldn't be the first time they have blatantly violated the Nuremberg Code and just gotten away with it. They experimented with children's mental health by putting them to live with pedophiles in the 80's and 90's and when people tried to get justice it was unironically excused as "oh those far right AfD are attacking LGBT people".

Leave the stereotypes out of it, thank you. It’s not like this sort of bullshit is unique to the Germans, historically or now.

And I’d blame the various degenerate and authoritarian left elements for both the pedo bullshit and this.

@DarthOne is very difficult for me to not believe @Sobek 's steoreotype considering the Reichkanzlerin was in there for longer than funny mustace dude and knowing a bit too many Germans are actually like that, not to mention that Merkel is from her father's side a Prussian, though she is also Polish.

With that said, you are right on it's not exclusive, considering my country is no longer a democracy.
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
@DarthOne is very difficult for me to not believe @Sobek 's steoreotype considering the Reichkanzlerin was in there for longer than funny mustace dude and knowing a bit too many Germans are actually like that, not to mention that Merkel is from her father's side a Prussian, though she is also Polish.

With that said, you are right on it's not exclusive, considering my country is no longer a democracy.

I will give you an hint : it's the first on the left.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Yeah, it made me magnetic, it made me a chick magnet!


Jokes aside, @Vaermina said "So, don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you just lost any and all credibility in this thread."

Pretty sure he lost his credibility 300 pages ago but he's still here lol

Dude literally uses standards to discredit sources, that his own sources don't meet. We discussed this a few days ago.
It seems that Vaermina's bad reputation in the SpaceBattles and Questionable Questing communities is well-deserved, sadly.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
‘Ethical standards’ put whites at back of line for Covid-19 treatment
Minnesota’s revised “ethical framework” for the rationing of medical care was posted late last week, and noted that “race and ethnicity alone, apart from other underlying health conditions, may be considered in determining eligibility” for monoclonal antibody therapies (mAbs). The department cited a finding by the US Food and Drug Administration that race and ethnicity might place Covid-19 patients at elevated risk of progression to severe illness.
Data on such risk provides the “ethical justification” for prioritizing non-white patients, according to the framework. The policy doesn’t reflect “moral judgments about the relative social worth of particular groups or arguments about reparations for historical injustices related to race, ethnicity or disability status,” the department said.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top