China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

The feds are on the case, making sure to remember the names of whoever speaks against daddy CEO!
I hardly disapprove of them keeping tabs on people sending death threats and I would be beyond shocked if Pfizer hasn't been sent death threats. One hopes the CIA is only involved regarding Pfizer's operations outside the USA and death threats of foreign origin, but ... don't bet money on it.
 
Yeah, I'm real sure this is about death threats. :sneaky:
"I don't really think I need a vaccine and I don't want to give it to my children"

"Death threats!"
Given that one Project Veritas vid showed a guy saying Pfizer was pretty much running completely on Wu Flu money these days, speaking out against their vax is a death threat...to thier companies continued existence now, because of thier dependency on Wu Flu money to stay operational and keep thier stock prices up.
 
Given that one Project Veritas vid showed a guy saying Pfizer was pretty much running completely on Wu Flu money these days, speaking out against their vax is a death threat...to thier companies continued existence now, because of thier dependency on Wu Flu money to stay operational and keep thier stock prices up.

They do still make other products, right?

But the logic of what you're saying tells us right there why one shot of the "vaccine" is not considered enough, nor two, nor three...
 
They do still make other products, right?

But the logic of what you're saying tells us right there why one shot of the "vaccine" is not considered enough, nor two, nor three...
All I know is the vid said Pfizer was effectively running on Wu Flu money now.

Given how the greedy cunts in charge of Big Pharma have acted before, I'm inclined to believe the Pfizer execs decided to hitch their horse to the Wu Flu stuff when it became obvious they would be protected from suites relating to their Wu Flu products.

They can still be sued over other products that go bad or where they hid side-effects.

But the liability protections around the Wu Flu stuff mean they can do anything they want, and not risk civil or criminal liability.
 
"I don't really think I need a vaccine and I don't want to give it to my children"

"Death threats!"
I mean if you wanna say the primary reason the FBI is reading Pfizer's mail is because they're running a 21st century COINTELPRO on antivaxers, I'm not gonna try to stop you. But are you seriously suggesting that in the current political climate a target as big as Pfizer hasn't attracted some actual death threats?
 
I mean if you wanna say the primary reason the FBI is reading Pfizer's mail is because they're running a 21st century COINTELPRO on antivaxers, I'm not gonna try to stop you. But are you seriously suggesting that in the current political climate a target as big as Pfizer hasn't attracted some actual death threats?
I never said they haven't received any death threats whatsoever.

I am saying that this is going to be abused to go after political/business enemies.

I mean we are currently living in times where parents concerned about their children's education are being labeled terrorists. There's no way I believe this won't be abused.
 
No. His entire point is that it's a excuse to run COINTELPRO. Stop giving them so much fair play, they don't deserve it.
I just think it sounds like a pointless waste of effort when there are plenty of school board meetings and such happening right out there in public. It's already a target rich environment. Contrary to the saying, even evil has to take a break now and then.
 
I just think it sounds like a pointless waste of effort when there are plenty of school board meetings and such happening right out there in public. It's already a target rich environment. Contrary to the saying, even evil has to take a break now and then.
No it doesn't, not when it's profitable enough many people have a stake in it.
 


The SEALs are suing Biden over the vax mandates.

On what actual grounds?

Navy SEALS aren't store clerks and I'm pretty sure that if push came to shove a random store clerk who doesn't know how to swim will be a whole hell of a lot sneakier than SEALs are because getting a job as a clerk often requires passing a background check and clerks still manage to steal enough that accountants have to include "shrinkage" (i.e.: employee theft) in the financial statements.
 
They can claim it is unethical to force such a mandate on people.
SEALs, like you and store clerks, are volunteers. They don't have to be there. They're paid to be there and can quit at any time, as can you if you decide to walk away.*

* Breach of contract penalties are part of the enlistment terms. They're not pretty, but you can quit whenever you want to.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top