China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

You seriously misunderstand what clickbait means. Also, rich of you to think that definition matters anymore. This is the same company pushing a vaccine that doesn't stop you catching or transmitting the virus.
I'd like to know how it isn't clickbait with a title like "Pfizer Is Now Developing A Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill That Must Be Taken Alongside Vaccines" when the actual article goes on to clarify (paraphrased) "... if you get sick with diagnosed Covid-19, because it's supposed to be treatment and not prevention."

The article contradicts its title. Because it's fucking clickbait. And you fell for it.
 
Like I said, the vaccine does not stop you getting Covid. We have seen that. Meaning if you take the shot you can still get sick meaning you will be taking the pills AND the vaccine. It's a matter of thinking about it and using the other information we already have to make sense of the headline.
 
Like I said, the vaccine does not stop you getting Covid. We have seen that. Meaning if you take the shot you can still get sick meaning you will be taking the pills AND the vaccine. It's a matter of thinking about it and using the other information we already have to make sense of the headline.
"MUST be taken ALONGSIDE vaccines"

"Must" is superficially false because it is not designed such that it only works in conjunction with vaccines. If you are desperate to read into it, you could say, "But in the future we will all be required to vaccinate, thus those who get sick who take this drug "must" be taking it as well as the vaccine." This makes "must" a technically accurate but incredibly foolish thing to say.

"Alongside" is superficially false even in the above scenario because there is no requirement of the pills and the vaccine doses being temporally close to one another, or in any particular temporal relation to one another. If you are desperate to read into it, you could say, "I choose to interpret "alongside" as "happening to the same person", even though there is no connection between the two in purpose or application." This would again be technically accurate (according your your idiosyncratic definition) but foolish.
 


So Alex Jones is getting reports of the vax causing cancer, including in Roger Stone's wife, who is supposedly now stage 4 non-Hodkin's lymphoma...with the spike protein being the main driver, according to the doc he's interviewing.
 


So Alex Jones is getting reports of the vax causing cancer, including in Roger Stone's wife, who is supposedly now stage 4 non-Hodkin's lymphoma...with the spike protein being the main driver, according to the doc he's interviewing.

Alex Jones is a rabid anti-vaxer... And that "doctor" he's interviewing is Judy Mikovits, a rabid anti-vaxer who is known for falsifying research and manipulating data...
 
Alex Jones is a rabid anti-vaxer... And that "doctor" he's interviewing is Judy Mikovits, a rabid anti-vaxer who is known for falsifying research and manipulating data...

Rabid? Has Alex Jones bitten anyone yet? /sarcasm
When you say that some one "is known for" - well, known to who? Is anyone who opposes vaccination "rabid"?
 
Some sane words from someone on the net:

The omission is the tell. You know that what they omit shows what they do not want you to see.


No vaccine is risk free. Some vaccines are more effective than others. Some vaccines are more dangerous than others. The smallpox vaccine was extremely effective because it was live virus that was a close relative of smallpox, but considerably less deadly, indeed, quite harmless.


The risk benefit ratio for smallpox vaccination was hugely in favor of vaccination. Before smallpox was exterminated, vaccination was a very good idea.


The risk benefit ratio for polio was less good, but still pretty good. But as ever more vaccines have come out, the risk benefit ratio has been getting worse and worse.


Nothing beats a live vaccination for effectiveness, but it is difficult to find a safe live vaccination.


Big Pharma and the medical industrial complex has an overwhelming bias in favor of vaccines, understating the dangers and grossly overstating the benefits.


The clot shot is by far the most dangerous yet, and not very effective. It does not look to be completely ineffective, but it does not make a very big difference.


If China flu was the end of the world, arguably justified, but it was overstated at the beginning, and has, like ebola, evolved to being less and less dangerous. From the point of view of the virus, killing, or even incapacitating, the host is murder suicide. The virus wants you wandering around coughing up mucus and sneezing snot. It does not want you dead, or even in bed.


There are a lot of close relatives of China Flu wandering around, most of which seem to be fairly harmless, and all of which have substantial cross immunity with China Flu. That is what should have been researched, and was not. That kind of science and engineering is too hard these days.
 


Joe Rogan had/has the Wu Flu, and is using/used Invermectin to beat it.

This has parts of the media and establishment freaking out, because they know trying to smear or suppress Rogan will only back fire, as more people trust him over them these days.
 
This just doesn't seem doable to me.

Australia's got a population of about 25 million, and one officer per 2-300 people. Assuming 1% of the population per day is on the toilet, sleeping, listening to loud music, dead battery, etc. and misses the text*, you're looking at 2-3 checkups per officer per day, actually significantly higher because not all of those officers are going to be on patrol, many are going to be administrative or working other issues and can't be spared to get check that granny forget how to plug her phone in again. So call it 4-5 checks a day.

Presume a check takes an average of 30 minutes of driving, knocking, and scolding granny for forgetting how to plug her phone in again. You're looking at 2-2 1/2 hours a day extra work. Is it really viable to put that much extra on them?

*I actually have no idea what the percentage might really be but go with this for now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top