You mean the thing that all signs point to Timcast making up and doesn't even have a corroborating quote?
-
The Sietch will be brought offline for HPG systems maintenance tomorrow (Thursday, 2 May 2024). Please remain calm and do not start any interstellar wars while ComStar is busy. May the Peace of Blake be with you. Precentor Dune
China Wuhan Virus Pandemic
- Thread starter Arch Dornan
- Start date
What was that you were saying?
You think they would lie about contacting a gov agency and risk official ire over a truck spill?
You realize that's him trying to use his own article as a source right?
Sobek
Disgusting Scalie
Yes I am sure the fence sitter Tim Pool just casually faked a conversation with a federal agency, not like there would be a dozen people lining up to immediately use this to shut him down. Nigga fuck off.
As for why the DOD clean up, I have heard a theory that they might be scared of the vaxx interfering with wildlife since it has that whole experimental mRNA meme going on. Probably better safe than sorry and get professionals to clean up on hazmat.
As for why the DOD clean up, I have heard a theory that they might be scared of the vaxx interfering with wildlife since it has that whole experimental mRNA meme going on. Probably better safe than sorry and get professionals to clean up on hazmat.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
I do not buy that they are scrambling to keep the vaccine, which has gone into hundreds of millions of human bodies, out of squirrel bodies.
Sobek
Disgusting Scalie
The Ivermectin narrative is picking up more speed. Now the NPC line is entirely about how it is a horse dewormer, how it is all made by one company so any claims it doesn't benefit big pharma are false, and how it has no studies.
1 is blatantly false, it is used in many animals along humans. The main difference between the horse stuff and human stuff is dosage and purity. That is why it is dangerous to take the horse Ivermectin, because some retard is gonna take the full dose and troll his own body. 2 Is also false, most of it is made by one company sure but places like India and Brazil have generic variants made by local companies cheap as well. As for 3 there are studies being done right now, but they only seem to care when they it's their "science"
1 is blatantly false, it is used in many animals along humans. The main difference between the horse stuff and human stuff is dosage and purity. That is why it is dangerous to take the horse Ivermectin, because some retard is gonna take the full dose and troll his own body. 2 Is also false, most of it is made by one company sure but places like India and Brazil have generic variants made by local companies cheap as well. As for 3 there are studies being done right now, but they only seem to care when they it's their "science"
The Judge really picked the wrong woman to try out his judicial activism on...Some good news at least.
It would have been one thing if this were an anti-vaxer, but this woman had an actual health issue preventing her from taking the vaccines. Which means all those happy little discrimination laws would have applied.
Yep, as we've observed, the virus hits the elderly badly, if not given proper therapeutics and care, but the vax's side-effects are most pronounced among the younger people.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
Those are the first numbers I've seen that put an actual scale to the problem that is serious.
In order for this to be genuinely scandalous though, it'll need to be serious myocarditis, not 'take a couple pills and it'll be gone in a week.'
Whether that's the case or not, I can't see from that chunk of data by itself.
Tweet deleted... This is why I say you should always direct copy twitter things...
Dude? You need to check yourself. We all know that Timpool is a fucking Chad. Look at him in his badass reporter vest.
See that? See all the bullets he's taking for your freedom? And he's the real deal, going on Fox News and talking about the left's narrative. HE'S SO GOD DAMN OBJECTIVE AND MIDDLE OF THE ISLE!
He's such a fucking Chad, he wears his beanie to an interview. He's that much of a dedicated, serious journalist. Not because he's a balding, soy-filled VICE reporter who decided he needed some gullible paypigs and thus markets his news to moderate right voters, then using his political position as a leftist to shield himself from all his neighbors and friends in New Jersey.
Oh wait, he is.
Look at all that soy. Why, you'd almost think he was a newscaster for CNN.
I guess that's why he tries to look street tough with his patchy as fuck beard, his beanie, his ballistic vest, and the occasional hoodie.
It's not fence sitting when you're exploiting both sides to push your numbers up.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
In the interest of not derailing the other thread, I am bringing this here since it seems topical.
But anyway, I'm not trying to get into the practicalities of whether this or that mask mandate or vaccine mandate is designed in an effective way. I'm asking you if you think the concept of requiring behavior such as doing certain behavior (e.g. washing hands), or refraining from other behavior (e.g. dirty sex), or taking prophylactic medication is something society has justification to do in principle. Or maybe you think it's OK for society to prohibit behaviors in the name of public health, but not to require behaviors in the name of public health, and I'd be interested in your reasoning.
*Context: HIV/AIDS being a gay plague
Is it masks, vaccines, or something else that you think we don't have "centuries of proof" about?
But anyway, I'm not trying to get into the practicalities of whether this or that mask mandate or vaccine mandate is designed in an effective way. I'm asking you if you think the concept of requiring behavior such as doing certain behavior (e.g. washing hands), or refraining from other behavior (e.g. dirty sex), or taking prophylactic medication is something society has justification to do in principle. Or maybe you think it's OK for society to prohibit behaviors in the name of public health, but not to require behaviors in the name of public health, and I'd be interested in your reasoning.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
It's perfectly acceptable for 'society' to have a social expectation that you wash your hands after going to the bathroom. It's not okay for 'society' to pass a law requiring you do so. It's also perfectly acceptable for private institutions to ask you to leave if you don't do so.
If we had an actual, bonified recurrence of something like the black death, such a drastic threat could justify more drastic measures. How drastic? That depends on the morality rate and the transmission vector. There is a point where 'you are practicing bad hygiene' can reasonably be interpreted to be giving people around you a 1/10 chance of dying.
That's the point where you go to 'criminal negligence.'
The Covid hysteria was based on something that didn't come even remotely close. The only quarantine that could possibly have been justified was a quarantine of the elderly, since they were the at-risk demographic, with specific individuals also self-quarantining because of their own personal comorbidities.
This mass lockdown and mask mandate hysteria has been nothing but a power grab from the beginning.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
So you agree that the measures are potentially legitimate depending on the threat being faced, and take the position that in this actual case the threat was not severe enough to justify the measures. That's fine, although I would rather not conflate the lockdowns with the mask mandates. While intrusive, mask mandates are much less drastic in terms of actual impact on one's life and livelihood. I honestly don't understand the anti-mask hysteria except insofar as it may be a battle of virtue signals.