People lying about Trump, or lying about things to because they either wanted to hurt Trump, or simply not be associated with him by agreeing with him, has cost possibly hundreds of thousands of lives.This is getting kinda wildly off topic. I will say that I never think one person or group engaging in bad behaviour ever justifies someone else behaving badly. I'm sure we could argue about who's worse and the reasons why different people did bad things, or about the effects of various things. This isn't really the time or place though, and I was simply posting to disagree with what seemed like an incorrect statement that people only disliked trump for reasons related to China. Since you suggested some yourself, I'm glad we can agree on my point and I'll leave it at that.
Trump did claim it was from a lab pretty early on.Didnt he casll it came from a Lab early on?
Didnt he start the vaccines?
He still should take credit. Because I he doesn't Biden will and that will be used to boost him as the president who ended COVIDPeople lying about Trump, or lying about things to because they either wanted to hurt Trump, or simply not be associated with him by agreeing with him, has cost possibly hundreds of thousands of lives.
The attacks on HCQ were all about going 'Orange Man Bad', the dismissal of the Lab Theory was about not wanting to say Trump was right (and people are straight admitting it now), and you want to pretend that those facts are 'off-topic' for this?!
Trump did claim it was from a lab pretty early on.
However I would not say he should want credit for the vaccines, given all the nasty side-effects that have been noted, and how the vaccines are now being used to increase Dem social control via the 'vaccine passports'.
Well, I guess that is one way to look at it.He still should take credit. Because I he doesn't Biden will and that will be used to boost him as the president who ended COVID
That has always matteredWell, I guess that is one way to look at it.
I guess in the end it is true that all that matters anymore is narrative, and how it can be used for or against a subject or group.
Facts used to matter more than narrative, or at least that was what people were told was how the world was supposed to work.That has always mattered
Look at WW2 Germany.Facts used to matter more than narrative, or at least that was what people were told was how the world was supposed to work.
Wu Flu has killed that too.
That's not something the US should want to emulate.Look at WW2 Germany.
It goes back to before then as well to bulshivik revolution etc.That's not something the US should want to emulate.
Yet we as a society lie to our youth for generations that facts matter more than narrative, that science is apolitical, and that cheaters never prosper.It goes back to before then as well to bulshivik revolution etc.
Propaganda is a useful tool that has existed for centuries
Truth is always subjective to the person speaking it.Yet we as a society lie to our youth for generations that facts matter more than narrative, that science is apolitical, and that cheaters never prosper.
At least the youth of today will grow up with no such illusions.
Ah yes, the old Obi-Wan Corallary.Truth is always subjective to the person speaking it.
What, exactly, am I deflecting from? Someone said people only dislike Trump because of China, I said that whether you agree with it or not there are other reasons, then a third person said "What about these other people, who did other bad things?"Nice deflect.
Still deflecting!
And you can't deflect anymore, so you declare victory and run away.
I mean off topic to anything I had said. Did people lying about what Trump said cause deaths? Sure, you go ahead and believe it, I can't be bothered to argue about that. What I was arguing with was only the idea people only dislike trump 'coz china.'People incessantly lying about Trump and what he said causing deaths' is pretty germane to the subject of the Wu Flu.
Given that is exactly what happened.
Regardless of whether you agree with the reasons or not, you know full well that plenty of people strongly disliked trump for reasons that had nothing at all to do with China.
I'd agree with that last bit but I'd also point out that once again whether it's right or wrong there were plenty of people who suffered from association with trump, sometimes because of him or sometimes because of his opponents.And those seem to be people who can't or won't distinguish between one thing and another. Intelligent, sane humans know that you can dislike someone and still agree with him when he's actually right.
You're trying to sayWhat, exactly, am I deflecting from? Someone said people only dislike Trump because of China, I said that whether you agree with it or not there are other reasons, then a third person said "What about these other people, who did other bad things?"
I mean off topic to anything I had said. Did people lying about what Trump said cause deaths? Sure, you go ahead and believe it, I can't be bothered to argue about that. What I was arguing with was only the idea people only dislike trump 'coz china.
isn't deflecting? Then again, you're not here to debate so much as you are to preach.Triggered much?
I'd agree with that last bit but I'd also point out that once again whether it's right or wrong there were plenty of people who suffered from association with trump, sometimes because of him or sometimes because of his opponents.
Of course. He was getting shat on non-stop by people who are objectively worse than him morally speaking. So much so that scientists were literally refusing to do their jobs either for fear of the people who hate Trump or because they're just as bad as those people. If you want an example of this happening, look at the creator of Five Nights at Freddy's. Because he's a republican and donated to republicans he's been threatened and there are doxx attempts for his home and pregnant wife. In fairness to the scientist, fears of being subjected to similar ordeals may be the primary example they kept quiet and it would be very understandable.And you don't think Trump has ever engaged in harassment or bullying behaviour?
Trump.
And he was banned for false reasons too. He tweeted that he wanted a peaceful, law abiding display and instead the call for a peaceful and law abiding march was ignored for the part where he asked for a march. As we all know, authoritarians don't care about nuance or context. Just whatever tidbit they can spin to give them the results they want.What I found amazing was the amount of it that turned up in Australia. I had to point out to a left leaning friend of mine that the President of the US was blocked from social media , before she realised just how big this was.