"Woke" Franchises

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder

…completely coincidentally Wayne Industries showed a record profit that year after the destruction of competing businesses. Not that any of it filtered down to the actual employees, custom-made bat-themed doohickeys don’t come cheap.
If that comic depicted Batman delivering the wrath of God on these rioters instead, crippling and maiming opponents, showing many antifa- and BLM-goons to be permamently hospitalized, and the rioters fleeing in terror while shitting and pissing themselves, it would have had record sales.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul

Gee, I wonder if it's Orange Man. :sneaky:

I guess one thing I can't help but note is this need to have a villain for the season the begin with. To paraphrase Picard from the beginning of NEM, does anyone remember when they were explorers?
 

posh-goofiness

Well-known member

Gee, I wonder if it's Orange Man. :sneaky:

I guess one thing I can't help but note is this need to have a villain for the season the begin with. To paraphrase Picard from the beginning of NEM, does anyone remember when they were explorers?
I still think that, despite the show's quality, Deep Space 9 did more to damage the franchise than anything Nu-Trek ever has. It introduced so much shit that allowed this more actiony, dramatic Trek incarnation to occur. The show itself was good, but holy fuck I wish they had never introduced things like the Dominion War, Section 31, Star Fleet Intelligence, the Marquis... just... ugh.

Edit: I just wish Star Trek had stayed in its niche of optimistic space exploration instead of the militarized... garbage its become.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
I still think that, despite the show's quality, Deep Space 9 did more to damage the franchise than anything Nu-Trek ever has. It introduced so much shit that allowed this more actiony, dramatic Trek incarnation to occur. The show itself was good, but holy fuck I wish they had never introduced things like the Dominion War, Section 31, Star Fleet Intelligence, the Marquis... just... ugh.

Edit: I just wish Star Trek had stayed in its niche of optimistic space exploration instead of the militarized... garbage its become.
Going to have to disagree with you. The Maquis was entirely B&B's idea, but it was a pretty good one, which naturally B&B never really did anything with. As for everything else, one of the things I liked about all that was that DS9 challenged ideals. Like TNG the entire point was to get the audience to think about things and consider other points of view. DS9 and the people who made it are in no way at fault for nuTrek, which should be pretty apparent as it's obvious that the people making nuTrek have never watched it. :cautious: Even besides that, something fans seem to keep forgetting is that in spite of what they might have thought of the shows, DS9 was the black sheep of the bunch as far as B&B were concerned, because it wasn't something they were directly making, and it did a lot of things they wouldn't have done, whereas VOY was exactly the kind of thing they wanted to make. VOY is also exactly the kind of thing the suits in Paramount wanted to make, and their interference actually stopped B&B from doing some things that actually would have been good. The Temporal Cold War over on ENT was also their fault. And then they acted confused when the audience they just took for granted wasn't there anymore.

ETA: The reason nuTrek is trying to be all dark and edgy is because the people making it think that's what's popular, and Abrams Trek really helped to steer them in that direction. Notice one of the people who wrote for those movies is now running things. For these idiots, Star Trek is just an IP they can use to try to make the generic, action-packed, special-effects-driven sci-fi that's making other studios gads of money. This is why they've ripped off everything popular they can think of, including making the first season of STP a rip-off of Mass Effect.
 

Bassoe

Well-known member

…completely coincidentally Wayne Industries showed a record profit that year after the destruction of competing businesses. Not that any of it filtered down to the actual employees, custom-made bat-themed doohickeys don’t come cheap.
If that comic depicted Batman delivering the wrath of God on these rioters instead, crippling and maiming opponents, showing many antifa- and BLM-goons to be permamently hospitalized, and the rioters fleeing in terror while shitting and pissing themselves, it would have had record sales.
Update, the comic author wrote an Official Complaint™.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Friendly Reminder - Rule 2A: Generalized Use of Slurs
Last edited:

edgeworthy

Well-known member
It turns out that my original fears about the casting of The Children in SKY's adaption of The Midwich Cuckoos may have been excessive. The young actors appear to be carrying off weird and creepy quite effectively. And there were some throwaway lines about DNA that handwaved the domestic drama.

The casting of the adult characters however!

In the opening act we meet the Inter-Racial couple, and then the Inter-Racial couple, and then the Inter-Racial couple.
If your show was set in southern California you would have trouble with plausibility if you had 3 Inter-Racial couples, but this is set in rural Buckinghamshire.
 

TyrantTriumphant

Well-known member
I have long been a fan of Dragon Age, despite leftward tilt of the developer's politics and the most recent title in the game showing early signs of wokeism. So naturally I am worried that the upcoming forth game in the series will be woke.

Recently someone on Twitter expressed similar concerns and the game devs responded that of course their game will be woke and that anyone who objects is an evil bigot filled with hate. Also most of the devs appear to be blue haired non binary or trans people who post their pronouns and think anyone to the right of John McCain is a Nazi.

So much for another beloved franchise.
 

Culsu

Agent of the Central Plasma
Founder
I have long been a fan of Dragon Age, despite leftward tilt of the developer's politics and the most recent title in the game showing early signs of wokeism. So naturally I am worried that the upcoming forth game in the series will be woke.

Recently someone on Twitter expressed similar concerns and the game devs responded that of course their game will be woke and that anyone who objects is an evil bigot filled with hate. Also most of the devs appear to be blue haired non binary or trans people who post their pronouns and think anyone to the right of John McCain is a Nazi.

So much for another beloved franchise.
Given Bioware`s trajectory ever since ME3 that is an utter non-surprise to me.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Dragon Age has always been kinda gay but it was manageable. You could bang a swarthy Elf on Easy Mode without feeling the need to go to the Chantry to purify yourself of the degeneracy. Penny Arcade even created a Rule to put the Gamer psyche at ease.

But the social media whinging by Dragon Age: Dickwolf Game Devs is concerning. They're talking as if they're already being victimized.
 

Stargazer

Well-known member
Given Bioware`s trajectory ever since ME3 that is an utter non-surprise to me.

For BioWare pushing "wokeness" goes back to before ME3. There was the romance between female Shepard and Liara in ME1, and KOTOR even had a cut romance between female Revan and Juhani. It's no surprise that BioWare is woke, they're just getting woke-r in line with progressive politics.

Anyways, "Lightyear" is underperforming at the box office. What Stopped Pixar’s ‘Lightyear’ From Going to Infinity and Beyond at the Box Office?

Of course, mainstream media is doing everything they can to ignore the possiblity that conservative families are staying away because they don't want their kids to see two women kissing. Get woke, go broke.
 
Last edited:

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
So, looks like Netflix is Going Broke.


“Those who have followed Netflix know that I’ve been against the complexity of advertising and a big fan of the simplicity of subscription. But as much as I’m a fan of that, I’m a bigger fan of consumer choice,” he said. “And allowing consumers who like to have a lower price, and are advertising tolerant, to get what they want makes a lot of sense.”

Yeah, they're spinning it as increasing consumer choice, by allowing customers to choose to have their stuff larded with ads. But I don't think anybody's buying it, and between this and the layoffs they've been doing and losing subscribers, it's pretty clear they're really running out of cash.
 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
...Yeah, they're spinning it as increasing consumer choice, by allowing customers to choose to have their stuff larded with ads. But I don't think anybody's buying it, and between this and the layoffs they've been doing and losing subscribers, it's pretty clear they're really running out of cash.
How else could they possibly spin it?

Their plan has failed b/c they 'woke' and forced it on their subscribers...who ditched their shit and ran.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top