For the third time and it isn't like an entire county wasn't caught covering up transgender serial rapists and it isn't like there's actual AP memos telling journos to cover up troon rapists or the Cali thing with the condoms.
Okay groomer
Transgender Rights
- Thread starter almostinsane
- Start date
-
- Tags
- debate trans transgender
For the third time and it isn't like an entire county wasn't caught covering up transgender serial rapists and it isn't like there's actual AP memos telling journos to cover up troon rapists or the Cali thing with the condoms.
Okay groomer
"Durr you believe in an LGBT illuminati."
No, I think institutions, especially academic and government ones by their very nature attract people who are either mediocre and dysgenic or highly driven but extremely predatory.
I also recognize deconstructivism and communism exist and are absolutely evil ideologies that have infested our societies across the west.
You combine the two and you get what you get. Namely a group of people who realize that it's easy to keep a society distracted from its own disenfranchisement when you target its children and shove absurdity in its face.
The trans movement has been a spectacular engine of diversion and division.
But while we are on the gay illuminati.
MLK, Elijah Mohhamed, Richard Nixon, John F Kennedy, Jim Garrison, Billy Graham and a few FBI directors all were absolutely convinced that it not only existed but caused both world wars and Nixon believed it killed Kennedy lol.
As far as whacky conspiracy theories go, fabulous men prancing in the shadows is not only one of dumbest conspiracy theories but its one of the more amusing ones.
No, I think institutions, especially academic and government ones by their very nature attract people who are either mediocre and dysgenic or highly driven but extremely predatory.
I also recognize deconstructivism and communism exist and are absolutely evil ideologies that have infested our societies across the west.
You combine the two and you get what you get. Namely a group of people who realize that it's easy to keep a society distracted from its own disenfranchisement when you target its children and shove absurdity in its face.
The trans movement has been a spectacular engine of diversion and division.
But while we are on the gay illuminati.
MLK, Elijah Mohhamed, Richard Nixon, John F Kennedy, Jim Garrison, Billy Graham and a few FBI directors all were absolutely convinced that it not only existed but caused both world wars and Nixon believed it killed Kennedy lol.
As far as whacky conspiracy theories go, fabulous men prancing in the shadows is not only one of dumbest conspiracy theories but its one of the more amusing ones.
Last edited:
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
That's because they artificially separate cases of child prostitution out from child sexual abuse.
There are around 60,000 cases of child sexual abuse.
There are around 100,000 cases of child prostitution.
So unless all these trusted male authority figures are, for some reason, paying their own children for sex something's obviously wrong with those figures, and it's because they don't call prostitution cases of children sexual abuse for some reason. Of course, there's no reason to presume that a majority of child prostitution cases are trans, I'm not aware of any studies suggesting nor checking for that, but it is apparent that "child abuse" numbers are getting massaged to condemn the nuclear family via excluding prostitution.
How about by proportion since Trans people make up a single digit percentage of the population?
Despite being 0.2% of the population.....
Lazer Raptor
Marxist-Lesbianist
I'm sure you have a source for that then? Or am I simply to believe you that actually trans people and not say, skeevy athletic coaches are the real threat to children?
King Arts
Well-known member
Ahh a Marxist "lesbian" Yup definite tranny radar signs going off. First off let me say you will never be a woman.
Secondly yes the "educated" classes are heavily political and the decision to remove transexuals from the DSM despite them obviously having body dysmorphia is obviously political. But then again removing homosexuality from the DSM was done for political reasons as well there wasen't some brand new discovery that showed it wasen't a mental illness.
Lazer Raptor
Marxist-Lesbianist
Like, trusted male authority figures are the primary perps not because men are inherently pedos or some bullshit, but because of their unrestricted access and power over children. Although to be fair, I'd wager a female teacher could get away with quite a bit simply due to cultural biases.
Edit:
Thank you for the obligatory "you'll never be a woman" comment and usual "people not getting that my title is a joke about "marxism-leninism" moment.
I guess the psychologists were all in cahoots with the gay mafia in *checks notes* 1973, that year in which psychology was famously politically correct.
Edit:
Thank you for the obligatory "you'll never be a woman" comment and usual "people not getting that my title is a joke about "marxism-leninism" moment.
I guess the psychologists were all in cahoots with the gay mafia in *checks notes* 1973, that year in which psychology was famously politically correct.
Asking for a source is inapplicable in this case.
You made a claim which was poorly framed. I merely asked why you framed the question one way instead of another? Hypothetically if there's a hundred and one cases of child sexual abuse coming from half of the population and another one hundred coming from .2% of the population, that would seem to indicate that your framing of the issue is misleading.
Lazer Raptor
Marxist-Lesbianist
I don't bother with a hypothetical like this because its completely worthless. I'm talking about empirical data, not "oh well maybe the proportions skewed if I make them up" of course they're skewed, since you made them up. Without empirical proof of such a phenomenon, there's no point to such a hypothetical.
1973? Hey isn't that the year the gay community started having to break heads to get the government funded and Academia supported NAMBLA types out of their movement?
The most famous amongst those types being a sick old bastard who wore dresses and trained toddlers to strip the moment they saw a pencil?
Isn't that when Zimmer Bradley started letting her male friends rape her daughter because she was mad the girl wasn't L or B or T? And she thought conversion therapy via penetration would fix that?
Damn. Hell of a year to use to deboonk our position.
Okay groomer.
The most famous amongst those types being a sick old bastard who wore dresses and trained toddlers to strip the moment they saw a pencil?
Isn't that when Zimmer Bradley started letting her male friends rape her daughter because she was mad the girl wasn't L or B or T? And she thought conversion therapy via penetration would fix that?
Damn. Hell of a year to use to deboonk our position.
Okay groomer.
ShadowsOfParadox
Well-known member
My own issue is with the "Trans Movement".
That is to say, that thing which at once ever tightens the definition and acceptable behavior for a gender and at the same time insists that "Gender is a Social Construct and Meaningless".
When we were small my mother took us to Church every Sunday, and one day my little brother insisted that the male formal wear was "boring" and that he wanted to "wear the interesting ones" that his sisters got to, my oldest sister convinced him to settle for painted toes, which would, obviously, be under socks and shoes. During the service he shucked his shoes and socks and showed off his painted toes and the Pastor noticed. It ended at the end of the service with a short exchange between the Pastor and my mom that went like this, Pastor: "Were you aware your son had painted toes?" Mom:"Yes." Pastor:"He might be gay, you'll need to be careful.' Mom, to herself: "He's five lol."
Today, that might well go something more like, Paster:"He might be Trans, and if you don't go to a psychologist to confirm that he is you will be sued." Mom: "He's like, five, feck all of you."
I'm not aware of any point where the Gay Movement told little girls who were tomboyish and liked Lego's that they were Lesbians who'd grow up to want to have sex with other women, or little boys who like Barbies that they were Gay and would grow up to want to have sex with other men. But I am aware of instances where the Trans Movement has insisted on both being examples of a child who's "Akshually" the other gender.
I played with Barbies rather a lot when I was young, ball and socket joints were fascinating to rip apart and put back together.
My Sisters quite enjoyed playing House with Lego peoples.
There are perfectly nice Trans People, but the "Trans Movement" is cancer to a liberal society.
That is to say, that thing which at once ever tightens the definition and acceptable behavior for a gender and at the same time insists that "Gender is a Social Construct and Meaningless".
When we were small my mother took us to Church every Sunday, and one day my little brother insisted that the male formal wear was "boring" and that he wanted to "wear the interesting ones" that his sisters got to, my oldest sister convinced him to settle for painted toes, which would, obviously, be under socks and shoes. During the service he shucked his shoes and socks and showed off his painted toes and the Pastor noticed. It ended at the end of the service with a short exchange between the Pastor and my mom that went like this, Pastor: "Were you aware your son had painted toes?" Mom:"Yes." Pastor:"He might be gay, you'll need to be careful.' Mom, to herself: "He's five lol."
Today, that might well go something more like, Paster:"He might be Trans, and if you don't go to a psychologist to confirm that he is you will be sued." Mom: "He's like, five, feck all of you."
I'm not aware of any point where the Gay Movement told little girls who were tomboyish and liked Lego's that they were Lesbians who'd grow up to want to have sex with other women, or little boys who like Barbies that they were Gay and would grow up to want to have sex with other men. But I am aware of instances where the Trans Movement has insisted on both being examples of a child who's "Akshually" the other gender.
I played with Barbies rather a lot when I was young, ball and socket joints were fascinating to rip apart and put back together.
My Sisters quite enjoyed playing House with Lego peoples.
There are perfectly nice Trans People, but the "Trans Movement" is cancer to a liberal society.
Lazer Raptor
Marxist-Lesbianist
Have you considered the hypothetical "What if right wing men committed 53% of all sex crimes while only 20% of the population?"
Really makes you think. Don't bother asking for sources since it's a hypothetical of course, you just need to consider it.
King Arts
Well-known member
What denomination are you where the pastor did not tell you that a man should not wear that which pertains to a woman and the reverse for women?
I never thought I'd see the day where a leftist movement would use the Rumsfeld doctrine as its core being.
"The absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence now put your son in a dress bigot!"
"The absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence now put your son in a dress bigot!"
Eh, press X to doubt here. There is quite simply no good data on this, and many of the studies commonly cited are flawed:
And given that big FBI operations across the country rescued less than 80 child prostitutes (but somehow 104 "pimps", my guess is that a number of the pimps are prostitutes who turned 18 and then drove a kid one time), I'd guess the real number to be smaller.
FBI: Nationwide child prostitution sweep leads to 104 arrests, 79 children rescued | CNN
During a three-day law enforcement sweep targeting teenage prostitution, officers rescued 79 children and arrested 104 alleged pimps, the FBI announced Monday.
edition.cnn.com
But what there is is a habit of trans people telling other trans young adults/teens that the way to fund their surgery is through prostitution (I recall a Blaire White video on her nearly doing this to herself).
This has a lot of truth to it, and I believe the same. I was the same for a little while. Being trans is not about 'identifying as a woman' or 'wanting to be a woman'. I wanted the second part for a while, still wouldn't mind it. Doesn't make me trans. Trans people have a deep gender dysphoria where they hate their body because it doesn't match with their self image. Those people need compassion, and I support them 100% when they get surgery (I have a person I know (haven't talked to in a while, but was a friend) who is in that category).
Found it on the Twitter.
Source (which has replies from the Reddit before said Reddit thread was shut down)
The other people are deluding themselves, and it sucks, because I can't say anything to them.
Lazer Raptor
Marxist-Lesbianist
I frankly don't even know what you're trying to say here except "im mad that the transes exist"
Also lol I'm literally just flipping your arguments on their head, I'm not projecting, I am emphasizing an argument's absurdity.
@Abhorsen has the right of things in regards to child prostitution btw, the data is a mess there, as evidenced even by its wikipedia article, and im reaalllyyy not qualified to talk one way or another seeing as I have no academic or personal experience.
On the other hand, I find the focus on gender dysphoria above all silly, when I would argue the key determinent is often gender euphoria because otherwise it's really really hard to seperate gender dysphoria from more "standard" dysmorphia or even pick it out specifically from severe depression or the like, and I've observed this with at least one friend who thought they might be a boy due to hating their body so much but then hated boyhood just as much and detransitioned before they could go on HRT.
Also note but estrogen actually decreases your sex drive, although ymmv depending on dosage and the individual.
Edit: edit for clarity, my friend has not gone on hrt.
Political realinment Trump basically kicked the neo cons out of the republican party and they went into the democratic one during Bidens attempt to centralize the establishment into the democratic party. Hence why you had cheny talk at a recent democratic event.
Except you didn't bring up empirical data. You made a claim using absolute values without citing them.
Then I asked what about proportion to population?
And you asked me for sources.
You were the one that made the claim. If you got numbers for both groups, feel free to present them.
The "Hypothetical" was to illustrate the pointlessness of your claim, not an actual argument or claim itself. You obviously knew that but want to keep deflecting and misdirecting. So keep on clowning.