My own issue is with the "Trans Movement".
That is to say, that thing which at once ever tightens the definition and acceptable behavior for a gender and at the same time insists that "Gender is a Social Construct and Meaningless".
When we were small my mother took us to Church every Sunday, and one day my little brother insisted that the male formal wear was "boring" and that he wanted to "wear the interesting ones" that his sisters got to, my oldest sister convinced him to settle for painted toes, which would, obviously, be under socks and shoes. During the service he shucked his shoes and socks and showed off his painted toes and the Pastor noticed. It ended at the end of the service with a short exchange between the Pastor and my mom that went like this, Pastor: "Were you aware your son had painted toes?" Mom:"Yes." Pastor:"He might be gay, you'll need to be careful.' Mom, to herself: "He's five lol."
Today, that might well go something more like, Paster:"He might be Trans, and if you don't go to a psychologist to confirm that he is you will be sued." Mom: "He's like, five, feck all of you."
I'm not aware of any point where the Gay Movement told little girls who were tomboyish and liked Lego's that they were Lesbians who'd grow up to want to have sex with other women, or little boys who like Barbies that they were Gay and would grow up to want to have sex with other men. But I am aware of instances where the Trans Movement has insisted on both being examples of a child who's "Akshually" the other gender.
I played with Barbies rather a lot when I was young, ball and socket joints were fascinating to rip apart and put back together.
My Sisters quite enjoyed playing House with Lego peoples.
There are perfectly nice Trans People, but the "Trans Movement" is cancer to a liberal society.