"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

Hence the rise of "doggy mommies",they'll deny it but that annoying purse puppy is a proxy infant.
wish that social engineering had been used to create amazons and Valkyries. I think both the military and nationwide health would be thankful. Many of the issues that have arisen started with the bigotry of low expectations, then those women fell into those low expectations, and then they started molding society into the image of said low expectations.
 
wish that social engineering had been used to create amazons and Valkyries. I think both the military and nationwide health would be thankful. Many of the issues that have arisen started with the bigotry of low expectations, then those women fell into those low expectations, and then they started molding society into the image of said low expectations.
Most women literaly can't be that. They don't have the temperament, the physical ability, the capacity for violence.

It's just not possible. Attempting to do so is, in part, the biggest problem we have.



The number of women who are happy with being masculine is very, very low.
 
Women were cruelly propagandized into believing that working 9-5 in a shitty office as a middle-man HR department slave, was equally important to their biological function.
Give a man a hammer, some wood, and some nails, and he'll happily build a shack because that is what he's been hardwired to do for thousands of years.
Give a man a pen, paper, and obscure tax paperwork and he'll consider suicide as a superior alternative.

Women are built the same way, make them do stuff they aren't supposed to do, and no SHIT their happiness is universally plummeting.
 
Most women literaly can't be that. They don't have the temperament, the physical ability, the capacity for violence.

It's just not possible. Attempting to do so is, in part, the biggest problem we have.



The number of women who are happy with being masculine is very, very low.

first of all these women aren't masculine they are Primadonnas playing at being masculine.

Second of all, those positive traits we attribute to being Masculine are just virtuous traits period just as negative feminine traits are just straight-up vice periods. What's between the legs is irrelevant which leads to...

third of all I'm more concerned about the quality of people as opposed to the quantity. Just because that number is very very low doesn't mean I shouldn't want that very very low number to flourish and become a higher number. The ONE positive thing about a social collapse/Great Reset is it tests the meddle of a person. "Hard times create..." and all of that.
 
Second of all, those positive traits we attribute to being Masculine are just virtuous traits period just as negative feminine traits are just straight-up vice periods. What's between the legs is irrelevant which leads to...

What men are almost always focused on, and what women are almost always focused on, they're not the same.


Men want fitness, for the physical capability, and appearance after that. For women, it's the other way around.



When things go to shit, I'm expecting that men will take over, and women will not lead, not at all.



After all, they never have before.
 
The number of women who are happy with being masculine is very, very low.
Men are not women and women are not men. We are not blank slates.

That does not make either inferior or superior and there’s more fluidity than the separate spheres obsessed victorians would have thought, but those are the way of things.

Edit: I would strongly disagree with the idea that women can’t lead. They have a different way of doing it. In the presence of Elizabeth I, Good Queen Bess herself, we’d all be bowing and scraping.
 
he'll consider suicide as a superior alternative
Be careful, we are already seeing suicide encouragement in places like Canada. I'm half-expecting both the American left and the American right to come up with philosophical reasons for why "undesirables committing sucide is actually a good thing." heck the statement I made above?
first of all these women aren't masculine they are Primadonnas playing at being masculine.

Second of all, those positive traits we attribute to being Masculine are just virtuous traits period just as negative feminine traits are just straight-up vice periods. What's between the legs is irrelevant which leads to...

third of all I'm more concerned about the quality of people as opposed to the quantity. Just because that number is very very low doesn't mean I shouldn't want that very very low number to flourish and become a higher number. The ONE positive thing about a social collapse/Great Reset is it tests the meddle of a person. "Hard times create..." and all of that.
I'm sure someone will accuse me of supporting eugenics by pointing out my last point completely ignoring my first two points
 
first of all these women aren't masculine they are Primadonnas playing at being masculine.

Second of all, those positive traits we attribute to being Masculine are just virtuous traits period just as negative feminine traits are just straight-up vice periods. What's between the legs is irrelevant which leads to...

third of all I'm more concerned about the quality of people as opposed to the quantity. Just because that number is very very low doesn't mean I shouldn't want that very very low number to flourish and become a higher number. The ONE positive thing about a social collapse/Great Reset is it tests the meddle of a person. "Hard times create..." and all of that.
He was only saying "most" because he did not want to deal in absolutes.

We have seen the worlds strongest woman lose arm wrestling to just random out of shape fat everydude that does not even exercise.

We have seen the worlds greatest female soccer team lose repeatedly to random highschool teams of 15 year old boys.

The amazons and valkyries are both fictional. neither has existed, ever.
In history we had one case of real women fighters...
tribal steppe nomads where 100% of non slave-males and 2/3rd of non-slave women were warriors (all actual work was done by slaves which they captured on their raids).

even then they relied on being horse archers who engaged solely in guerilla tactics using 15 lbs draw extra-short-bows that were only even effective at all because they used venom tipped arrows.

The fact is, social engineering WAS used to try to turn all women into amazons. and it failed catastrophically because of how anti biology it is.

A more realistic and healthy goal would be to aim at trying to get women to be healthy-fit rather than Amazonian.
Where they are encouraged to do track, swimming, yoga, etc because it is healthy to be thin instead of a land whale? that would have been nice. (instead we got the anti fat shaming nonsense that women themselves always start)
But we shouldn't encourage them to be men
 
The fact it, social engineering WAS used to try to turn all women into amazons. and it failed catastrophically because of how anti biology it is.

I have a hard time buying that was social engineering's attempt because if it were I would have thought crying all over social media would have gotten you ridiculed and potentially slapped, not called stunning and brave.

A more realistic and healthy goal would be to aim at trying to get women to be fit rather than Amazonian. Where they are encouraged to do track, swimming, yoga, etc because it is healthy to be thin instead of a land whale? that would have been nice.

yeah as much as I overexaggerated with the whole amazons and Valkeries thing the above would be more of an end goal. Tomboys are liked for a reason.
 
Be careful, we are already seeing suicide encouragement in places like Canada. I'm half-expecting both the American left and the American right to come up with philosophical reasons for why "undesirables committing sucide is actually a good thing." heck the statement I made above?
Well, specifically Canada is asking for its White population to commit suicide. None of the ads depict any other race, despite the usual ad being like 50% non-White.
 
He didn’t “help”, he full stop put an end to it. Napoleon takes much that is worth salvaging from the Revolution and codifies it, whilst settling the horror in the Vendee.

He could have been Charlemagne Mk II, but he was a bit too war happy and the Revolution so spooked the rest of Europe that he was essentially trapped with its baggage.

On the subject of the thread, Bonaparte had some interesting things to say about women, none of which I think he’d have dared to say in the presence of his mother!
Not rest of Europe,but England which keep making coalition against him,till he finally lost.
Dude really should invade them with steamboats.After finishing off their attack dog,Prussia,first.
Only then he could rule - becouse England organized wars against anybody who was strong enough to unite Europe since they defied their rightfull Kings.

So,only reasonable politic for any strong country after 1688 was kill Prussia and invade England next.

And i agree,that womens should be muscle tomboys !;)
 
Last edited:

When even Sydney Watson is pointing out that female characters in media are becoming more and more masculine and, frankly, fucking ugly.

Well, she's not wrong -- Tanya in the latest Mortal Kombats looks like a caricature of a Black person with an ape. So, yeah -- even a bit of racist undertone with that particular example, lol.
 
Women were cruelly propagandized into believing that working 9-5 in a shitty office as a middle-man HR department slave, was equally important to their biological function.
Give a man a hammer, some wood, and some nails, and he'll happily build a shack because that is what he's been hardwired to do for thousands of years.
Give a man a pen, paper, and obscure tax paperwork and he'll consider suicide as a superior alternative.

Women are built the same way, make them do stuff they aren't supposed to do, and no SHIT their happiness is universally plummeting.

Plenty of guys like tax work.


When even Sydney Watson is pointing out that female characters in media are becoming more and more masculine and, frankly, fucking ugly.

Well, she's not wrong -- Tanya in the latest Mortal Kombats looks like a caricature of a Black person with an ape. So, yeah -- even a bit of racist undertone with that particular example, lol.


Even Sydney Watson? Lmao, she's a right wing political commentator.
 
Plenty of guys like tax work.



Even Sydney Watson? Lmao, she's a right wing political commentator.
There's been a bit of controversy about her lately, IIRC (not sure what, but I've seen her name pop up a few times in passing videos), and when it comes to women she's always been on the middle road compared to other Right-leaning commentators -- for her to basically say "yeah, this is dumb" is saying something.
How feminine and conventionally pretty do you expect Aloy to be given that she's literally raised in the wilderness by a lone male exile?
A change in lifestyle (such as better food, being exposed more to the sun, et cetera) doesn't subtly change things like bone structure or make you, well, uglier. You can see the changes they made between Zero Dawn and Forbidden West when they're side-by-side.

Additionally, since they basically made her at least Bi in the DLC, a lot of people are saying that they've done the whole "butch Lesbian" stereotype with her (given her love interest is very feminine and pretty).

So, yeah -- it's subtle but there.

Let's not even go into the Baldur's Gate 3 character that looks like if Gollum and a troll fucked and had a kid.
 
How feminine and conventionally pretty do you expect Aloy to be given that she's literally raised in the wilderness by a lone male exile?
Dunno, about anything other than having a case of chubby cheeks worthy of what at least in my part of the world would be considered a stereotypical middle aged butcher/cook/baker woman?
Come on, look at pictures of, for close lifestyle proxy, female third world guerillas, or soldiers. Good luck finding any with similar features as for obvious reasons they trend towards skinny/athletic physique, so the realism argument definitely is applied in the wrong direction here if anything.
 
There's been a bit of controversy about her lately, IIRC (not sure what, but I've seen her name pop up a few times in passing videos), and when it comes to women she's always been on the middle road compared to other Right-leaning commentators -- for her to basically say "yeah, this is dumb" is saying something.

A change in lifestyle (such as better food, being exposed more to the sun, et cetera) doesn't subtly change things like bone structure or make you, well, uglier. You can see the changes they made between Zero Dawn and Forbidden West when they're side-by-side.

Additionally, since they basically made her at least Bi in the DLC, a lot of people are saying that they've done the whole "butch Lesbian" stereotype with her (given her love interest is very feminine and pretty).

So, yeah -- it's subtle but there.

Let's not even go into the Baldur's Gate 3 character that looks like if Gollum and a troll fucked and had a kid.

Aloy? Butch?

Anyone who says that is a fucking idiot.

Their changes were kinda dumb- if they wanted it to be realistic they should've made her a bit more obviously toned around the arms. I don't mind the skin detail on the face, but the chubby cheeks look disproportionate to the fat distribution on her arms and legs.

Also don't you diss Laezel. She looks inhuman because she's not a fucking human. But she's about as hot as a realistic-looking frog-orc humanoid is gonna look.

Also its so bizarre to me that "conservative" gamers are complaining that BG3 isn't horny enough when it's the horniest, most sex appeal obsessed AAA game of the year. Like it's literally a game where you can take all your female companions into battle naked or in lingerie.

baldurs_gate_3_romance_laezel.0.jpg
 
And I can't help but think of Mass Effect Andromeda and how the default male character looks exactly like the male model he was based on, but the default female character looks nothing like the female model she was based on, and how ugly basically every female character in that game is.
 
Aloy? Butch?

Anyone who says that is a fucking idiot.

Their changes were kinda dumb- if they wanted it to be realistic they should've made her a bit more obviously toned around the arms. I don't mind the skin detail on the face, but the chubby cheeks look disproportionate to the fat distribution on her arms and legs.

Also don't you diss Laezel. She looks inhuman because she's not a fucking human. But she's about as hot as a realistic-looking frog-orc humanoid is gonna look.

Also its so bizarre to me that "conservative" gamers are complaining that BG3 isn't horny enough when it's the horniest, most sex appeal obsessed AAA game of the year. Like it's literally a game where you can take all your female companions into battle naked or in lingerie.

baldurs_gate_3_romance_laezel.0.jpg

I'm becoming more and more convinced by the day that millennials and Zers have just straight up lost the plot of life.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top