The War in Afghanistan

Throw in some money and they certainly would be interested.
But what countries would be interested in being the other side of that exchange?

Iran? Syria? Iraq I'm less sure about because they already have a lot of problems with unemployment, electricity outages, and whatnot.
 
Iran? Syria? Iraq I'm less sure about because they already have a lot of problems with unemployment, electricity outages, and whatnot.
Exactly, one already has plenty Afghan refugees and if they wanted more they could just ask (hint: they don't), the other is a place people try to run away from as much as Afghanistan.
 
Exactly, one already has plenty Afghan refugees and if they wanted more they could just ask (hint: they don't), the other is a place people try to run away from as much as Afghanistan.

AFAIK, the main people who are trying to run away from Syria are those who are hostile towards Assad, which are generally Sunnis to my knowledge. In contrast, the Hazara are Shi'ites.

Really, I wouldn't mind having the US accept some of them:


AFAIK, Hazaras are some of the more moderate Afghans out there. I would prefer Hazara refugees to Pashtun refugees, all else being equal.
 
AFAIK, the main people who are trying to run away from Syria are those who are hostile towards Assad, which are generally Sunnis to my knowledge. In contrast, the Hazara are Shi'ites.
Those are certainly more motivated. Doesn't change the fact that even for Shiites Syria can only offer dysfunctional, dictatorial government and poverty.
Really, I wouldn't mind having the US accept some of them:


AFAIK, Hazaras are some of the more moderate Afghans out there. I would prefer Hazara refugees to Pashtun refugees, all else being equal.
That's some textbook damning faint praise.
 
Those are certainly more motivated. Doesn't change the fact that even for Shiites Syria can only offer dysfunctional, dictatorial government and poverty.

At least they won't have to worry about persecution, though.

That's some textbook damning faint praise.

Well, Hazaras are more committed to things such as women's rights, human rights, democracy, freedom of speech, free expression/free press, et cetera than other Afghans are. Though it's all relative, of course. Even Hazaras need to learn to accept Charlie Hebdo cartoons as opposed to rioting over them, for instance.
 
At least they won't have to worry about persecution, though.
It's Syria, yes, they do have to worry about that. One wrong word and Assad's goons will be very unhappy with anyone.

Well, Hazaras are more committed to things such as women's rights, human rights, democracy, freedom of speech, free expression/free press, et cetera than other Afghans are. Though it's all relative, of course. Even Hazaras need to learn to accept Charlie Hebdo cartoons as opposed to rioting over them, for instance.
Exactly, "More than other Afghans" still can mean "less than most of the world".
 
It's Syria, yes, they do have to worry about that. One wrong word and Assad's goons will be very unhappy with anyone.


Exactly, "More than other Afghans" still can mean "less than most of the world".

Well, Yeah, they can get persecuted for their political opinions, albeit not so much for their religion or ethnicity.

Yeah. And this is why one wants to ensure successful assimilation. Take a look at my Canada Hazaras link right above.
 
Well, Yeah, they can get persecuted for their political opinions, albeit not so much for their religion or ethnicity.
That's the thing, in western ideological bullshitry, that's a totally important difference and near sacrosanct status is given to the latter, even though especially in ME politics, the line between religion, ethnicity and politics is blurry at best, for many people in some factions there these 3 are one and indivisible.
On more practical level, persecution is persecution, people don't care much which they are being persecuted for specifically, they care that they are being persecuted.
Yeah. And this is why one wants to ensure successful assimilation. Take a look at my Canada Hazaras link right above.
Well those are handpicked success stories... But what are the statistics?
 
Some Hazara refugee success stories from Canada:

Hazaras?

Last time I heard a Hazara open her mouth, she called the Taliban "our brothers"




and unhchr

really?

do you not know the true purpose of the UN?
 
Hazaras?

Last time I heard a Hazara open her mouth, she called the Taliban "our brothers"




and unhchr

really?

do you not know the true purpose of the UN?


Yeah, she fucked up in regards to this. A little too friendly with the Talibs, if you ask me! And ironically sucking up to them hasn't made them any friendlier in regards to women's rights either!

Also, the Hazaras' plight is mentioned elsewhere as well:



That's the thing, in western ideological bullshitry, that's a totally important difference and near sacrosanct status is given to the latter, even though especially in ME politics, the line between religion, ethnicity and politics is blurry at best, for many people in some factions there these 3 are one and indivisible.
On more practical level, persecution is persecution, people don't care much which they are being persecuted for specifically, they care that they are being persecuted.

Well those are handpicked success stories... But what are the statistics?

Yeah, fair points.

Yeah, I'd like to see the statistics as well. That said, though, what I do know is that Afghans in Canada have an average IQ of around 95:


FCnS7vDX0AUtdCC


But they don't only include Hazaras!

But Yeah, basically, Afghans are a Muslim version of Latin Americans for Canada!
 
Nothing new, with a hint of self-interest bias from the bureaucracy and contractor side who would have preferred the status quo to go on, with all the spending and positions that it implied.

The conclusion is that the existence of Afghan government was based on US air support, flow of US money, and a hope that the former two will continue, giving some shade of stability.
Which is something, but if that is all there is to show after 20 years in terms of "nation building", that's a level of achievement to be expected after 2 years, not 20.

What is lacking there is an argument that it was within US interest to continue floating up the minimal stability of the notably useless Afghan government. Sure, things may go to shit, but whose problem is that? After all, none of US allies neighbor Afghanistan, its a gallery of enemies and frenemies instead.
 
Nothing new, with a hint of self-interest bias from the bureaucracy and contractor side who would have preferred the status quo to go on, with all the spending and positions that it implied.

The conclusion is that the existence of Afghan government was based on US air support, flow of US money, and a hope that the former two will continue, giving some shade of stability.
Which is something, but if that is all there is to show after 20 years in terms of "nation building", that's a level of achievement to be expected after 2 years, not 20.

What is lacking there is an argument that it was within US interest to continue floating up the minimal stability of the notably useless Afghan government. Sure, things may go to shit, but whose problem is that? After all, none of US allies neighbor Afghanistan, its a gallery of enemies and frenemies instead.

Agreed with your analysis here, unfortunately.

 
''Russian-backed claims''

Everything that is bad has Russian appended these days. It was western media that started the tons of cash hauled out of Afghanistan story, now they hide behind claims of Russian disinformation.
rember russia bought the 2016 election for a low 5 digit number. rubles are super powerful.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top