I don’t like using the word “racism” at all because it’s use is downright Orwellian in its significance and usage. Calling people racist is just giving power to the left.
But for a moment, let me use the word by first giving it a more narrow and meaningful definition. I will define racism (for the purpose of this post) as hatred, hostility, and bad intentions directed at one or more races. This means that hating a race or wanting them to suffer would be racism, but saying that you favor your own race or that a certain group is better at music isn’t.
So by the above definition of racism, both the right and the left in the modern USA have a racism problem. They both have a racism problem and the racism in both cases is directed at white people, both the right and left have an anti-white racism problem.
For the left, this is obvious. The left openly admit that they dislike whites, that whites are the source of the world’s problems, they openly call for government and private policies to discriminate against whites, support disenfranchisement of whites, and celebrate whites becoming oppressed and scapegoated minorities in every nation where whites live, including European nations. Anti-white racism is the primary goal of the left, all other issues are of secondary or tertiary importance.
What about the right then? Well, their racism isn’t as overt. The mainstream of the American right will advocate for color blind polices, non-discrimination, and integration. They will advocate for white people especially to pursue these polices in a world and political climate where every other ethic group pursues their own internet first and foremost at the expense of white ethnic interests. Furthermore, the mainstream of the right will viciously attack any white people who suggest that they advocate for their own ethnic interests, or even opposing anti-white racism, while only expressing mild opposition to other ethnicities doing the same. This is even assuming that the right wing person is even an actual right winger, because a high percentage of them are just more moderate leftists who advocate for the same policies as leftists do (above) in a more moderate way.
The right wing racism problem amounts to seeing Bob attack John and standing by passively watching, maybe commenting about how it’s wrong of Bob, until John punches back and then jumping on John and savagely attacking him and admonishing him for being violent against Bob. Could you really say that this person is just against violence for attacking John or would you say that doing this would in fact be showing a dislike of John? This is the anti-white racism that pervades the modern right. It’s actually pretty similar to how the police act with regard to BLM and Antifa too.
There is a widespread war against whites in the modern West. A movement to demonize us, destroy our culture, scapegoat us for the world’s problems, pass laws to discriminate against us, turn us into despised minorities in every nation, and ultimately far worse if South Africa is any indication for what the future holds. The left says that you’re a horrible racist Nazi if you aren’t actively helping this to happen, the right says that you’re a horrible racist Nazi if you want to stop this from happening.
So yes, both sides have major racism problems, if we are even to use the word “racism” which I’d rather not. More accurately, I would avoid the R-word and just say that both sides are anti-white in their intentions and policies.
So, are there actual white racists among the right? Sure, a few, but they have little to no influence in the mainstream right of any Western nation. Why are they there? Well, if you’re an actual White Nationalist would it be better to support a mildly anti-white party or a staunchly anti-white party? It might be reasonable to regard the GOP as a lesser evil and worth voting for, though that conclusion may be incorrect.