The motivations for sex and the consequences

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
It’s my belief that simps have always been around, and by always I mean that women exploiting simps is an evolutionary strategy that likely goes back to before we could be considered human. Though that relationship, with simps supporting women who themselves pursued the alpha males, had to be quashed in order for civilization to develop. To maintain a healthy functional civilization, you need to have monogamy, male dominance, and female submissiveness. This is why if we look back at early civilizations, there was zero tolerance for that kind of thing. Now, despite all of our technology and knowledge, we are socially reverting back to precivilizational barbarism and that will have (and already has) consequences.

To go back to the evolutionary aspect of the simp and his female counterpart. A few years back this weird artist girl made little comics of humans if they had the breeding/sexual characteristics of certain kinds of animals. One species of animals stood out to me, the side-blotched lizard.

There are three different kinds of males with this species. Alpha males who have harems, beta males who are essentially monogamous, and then you have extremely feminine males who can pass for females and skulk around the outskirts of the alpha male’s territory to try to have sex with his females. The last one is the simp equivalent. Of course the female (likely human and lizard both) would rather have the alpha male‘s offspring, but the one alpha male likely can’t provide enough resources and so the harem females get additional resources from those omega males and occasional sex with them too. Humans, like lizards, can fall into those categories but harems and simps destroy social cohesion and so must be minimized through upbringing, laws, and social pressure. In the modern era, not only have we eliminated those methods of reducing simping, but we have put in place upbringing, laws, and social pressure that encourages it.
I do not know what this path will be when we got shit like onlyfans, twitch and porn sites but when sex dolls are slowly accepted we're going to go another way when simps can afford sex dolls. The day artifical wombs become real is when marriages we know today truly change.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
I do not know what this path will be when we got shit like onlyfans, twitch and porn sites but when sex dolls are slowly accepted we're going to go another way when simps can afford sex dolls. The day artifical wombs become real is when marriages we know today truly change.
One thing'd be for sure, feminists will try to ban and outlaw that kind of technology.
 
Not sure where you oughta put it, I think it could go here or be it's own thread. But, either way, I'm legit curious to hear your thoughts on the matter.


long story short I'm not sure if honestly they would help, but it's at least become clear that despite the for all the talk about the free love revolution America only seems to embrace sex so long as it's beneficial to Hollywood and elites. Once it no longer benefits them, then anyone who expresses open sexuality is considered perverted at best, or a rapist if you happen to be a man. meanwhile stuff like Cuties is not only considered AOK it's considered empowering.

At least when sex was considered evil outside of making new converts for the church it was at least a consistent view even if it made no since outside of a religion.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Not a problem for the happy merchant. She gets a guaranteed baby maker and get to take care of the poor baby who has a granny as a mom.
Yet another generarion of directionless children who have not been taught how a real man acts and thinks. Jay-sus, any older civilization would be aghast at how much power women have over our societies. They'd conclude the treatment of their own women is correct, and I can barely find it in myself to disagree.
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Yet another generarion of directionless children who have not been taught how a real man acts and thinks. Jay-sus, any older civilization would be aghast at how much power women have over our societies. They'd conclude the treatment of their own women is correct, and I can barely find it in myself to disagree.
Such is the time we live in. No going back just ever forward.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Yet another generarion of directionless children who have not been taught how a real man acts and thinks. Jay-sus, any older civilization would be aghast at how much power women have over our societies. They'd conclude the treatment of their own women is correct, and I can barely find it in myself to disagree.
Such is the time we live in. No going back just ever forward.

Europe’s Muslim Migrant population that will replace them all in maybe 1-2 decades, will probably enforce a much more “traditional” sort of lifestyle on all the women.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Or they end up degenerate themselves.

Possibly a mix, hypocrisy abounds and many are punished by those with extremely hedonistic desires that are repressed and done via the black market and deep web

Those who are more Western will be a secret fringe that is upset with how much they have to hide in fear of punishment

Course even that level of repression may vary from place to place
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
I think they are already trying that, now that sex dolls slowly become more elaborate and life-like.
Well, in sweden the feminists are demanding a pre-emptive ban of sex-dolls as they "could lead to dehumanizing of and more violence against women".

... it's funny how feminists made a full 180° turn about how only women can cook, clean, and raise children. Like: "Can a sex bot cook you food? Can it clean the house? Can it raise your children?" Well, the obvious counter is "Can you do any of these?"
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Well, in sweden the feminists are demanding a pre-emptive ban of sex-dolls as they "could lead to dehumanizing of and more violence against women".

... it's funny how feminists made a full 180° turn about how only women can cook, clean, and raise children. Like: "Can a sex bot cook you food? Can it clean the house? Can it raise your children?" Well, the obvious counter is "Can you do any of these?"

Only way they’d approve of Monstergirls is if they can become them via Monsterization and even then they’ll be aghast at the heightened desire for a lifemate and progeny

Our evolutionary instincts clash with everyday civilization, these ladies are just eliminating those who may take away potential mates
 

Culsu

Agent of the Central Plasma
Founder
Well, in sweden the feminists are demanding a pre-emptive ban of sex-dolls as they "could lead to dehumanizing of and more violence against women".

... it's funny how feminists made a full 180° turn about how only women can cook, clean, and raise children. Like: "Can a sex bot cook you food? Can it clean the house? Can it raise your children?" Well, the obvious counter is "Can you do any of these?"
Heh, the real interesting kicker will be when the question realistically becomes "Can you do any of these better?" 😆 PS: The answer with that kind of woman is most likely "no".
 
Last edited:

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Heh, the real interesting kicker will be when the question realistically becomes "Can you do any of these better?" 😆 PS: The answer with that kind of woman is most likely "no".
I wonder what kind of society would form from that point. The only story that even remotely alluded to that was Armitage III, and that focussed on action mostly. Maybe something like the ancient greeks, but with blatant favoritism shown towards female automatons? Would be a weird turnaround.
 

Lord Sovereign

The resident Britbong
Yet another generarion of directionless children who have not been taught how a real man acts and thinks. Jay-sus, any older civilization would be aghast at how much power women have over our societies. They'd conclude the treatment of their own women is correct, and I can barely find it in myself to disagree.

Women are sovereign human beings like the rest of us. To deny them rights that are guaranteed to men is hardly fair, but only a fool would deny that feminism has taken us all for a ride. The problem is, once again, the naive liberals of yesteryear let the communists into the institutions. Thus the Marxists have brainwashed and turned many women into a weapon against the society they seek to overthrow: they have weaponised the female sex right under our noses (It should be noted, however, very many women are most certainly not onboard with this).

Get them out of the goddamn schools, and a lot of these problems would be gone within two generations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top