The problem is, physical strength is not near as necessary for survival as it was. In ancient times-soy boys/weak beta losers would simply not survive-they'd either toughen up or they'd not survive childhood. Even peasants had to have a modicum of strength and self respect.
Those are still the best men, and anyone saying otherwise deserves to be shoved in a locker.
"Rise of" bro simps have always and will always be a thing sorry.
This entire line of argument boils down to. "Father's need to be present to teach manhood or the boy won't get laid." Lack of father's is (drum roll) once again the base issue. Noticing a pattern yet understand why feminism targets the nuclear family yet? Destruction of patriarchal (father's) authority destroys societies.
That's exactly it in order to bully one must by definition be strong. Otherwise how would you actually bully someone. So what's going on is tuat women are attracted to strong men. As well as strong men will become bullies without an older male. To channel thier inherent strength into productive pursuits. The man is still a strong man even if evil basically. Women are attracted to strong men regardless of morality.
That is not true, unless you equate strong with social acceptance. You can be a bully and not be very strong very easily. Depends on the social character of your school. The key part is being socially prominent.
Nope humans ate social animals strong implyies powerful. Not necessarily physically but vin whatever way achieves said power. Also women are absolutely attracted to power period. What the study says isn't overly relevent here. Humans anf thereforewonen are smart tribal apes. Female tribal apes will be attracted to powerful males it's that simple. Honestly believe as you will but frankly your a homosexual. Your advice on women isn't well relevent at all. As you don't actually pursue them I'm going to go ahead and stuck with what gets broads naked. It's worked since 7th grade so yeah. People can do or believe whatever they want but what I'm saying acually works. So yeah
First of all, Bisexual, so my advice on what people find attractive in guys is better than yours, and my thoughts on what makes a female attracted to males is about equal. Like apes, humans engage in dominance games. But although for apes, the game can ultimately be won by physical strength, in the civilized world, different games can be played in different subcultures, for different successes in reproduction. Strength is one possible game. Now, apparently, you've optimized for where you are, but if I popped you in a different subculture, strength might be vastly less important than other attributes, and you'd lose in those dominance games, then be a social outcast there.
Except social power is in fact strength which I litterally said. "Strength" means power not physical prowess. Also believe as you will but what I'm saying is reality. You can play whatever games you like I and those like me. Will figure out the win condition and we'll emulate that and women will get naked. Basically I agree that different factor's will effect "alphaness" in different contexts. The thing is an actual "alpha" will adapt and win regardless of the win condition.
I'm still going to document it if I feel like it.
They aren't. The internet just allows simping to be way easier to do.
And ease of anything will increase the supply. Hence the explosion of simps.
Goes back to at least Courtly Love, 11th century. Just that the trend has its peaks and valleys, and that social flaw gets weeded out through natural selection. Hard to pass on a cultural trait when you leave no legacy and have no children to teach.
I wish you a long, healthy and happy relationship. Suceeds where others who air their issues online fail.
I hate to be the one to tell you this but things can exist to different degrees while still existing in continuity.
Yes I pointed that out in the next post.