Which I don't get. Hell, I'm not even sure I want to get it. I can somewhat see it as a reaction to things like Drag Queen Story Hour and the ever expanding list of genders, but it still looks like a massive over-correction in that context. LGBT is not even that good an umbrella term, and the sins of one group under that umbrella don't reflect the others.
Seriously, what gives?
So this will sound weird, but what the average LGBT person wants out of the LGBT political movement is ultimately conservative. Here me out. We want basically 3 things:
1) The right to marry, form a family, and be less bothered by the government in private life.
2) The ability to work and have a house without being fired or kicked out for who you are.
3) The desire to fulfill gender roles without shame, albeit different to birth gender roles.
Now admittedly 2 is a little iffy on the conservatism, but the goal (have a job and a house) is a conservative, self reliant, good goal.
What you are about to say is that the LGBT movement haven't wanted this, point out how gays have tons of sex, and how all the non-binaries aren't wanting the gender roll, and that this is what the movement is now. But this is not the average LGBT wants, and as LGBT gets more and more rights, LGBTs were able to integrate more and more into society, and become a normal functioning part of it. And you are right, the LGBT
activists hate these things. Some of them were against gay marriage because it would ruin gay culture, not realizing that gay culture exists for the same reason that Irish Cuisine exists: you made due with the shit you had, and pretended it was good. Now that we have a choice, we keep the good bits, and forget about the rest.
I mean just look at Gay culture, then vs now. In the 60s, if you were outed as gay, you got supercanceled. Not just your job and society, but also your family would exile you. You'd frequently end up living in one of the few gay 'Meccas' which were really Gommorahs. The squalor was horrific, and people would have constant meaningless sex because they had no way to set up lasting relationships. If you think now is bad, you just have no concept of how bad it used to be. They were denied renting, denied jobs, denied loans denied anyway out of poverty. Slowly, gays managed to change this by pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, and now gays are having families. Raising children, who would otherwise have been raised by the state. This is a huge conservative win in substance. A whole 5% of society cut down on rampant sex and began becoming contributing members of society.
The problem is the same problem that black culture has. There are activists who won't take the win, and think there's more to fight. There's about 3 types of this. Grifters, who want to make money off of being woker; college activists, who missed out on their opportunity to make a difference because they were born to late, and just refuse to accept that we already won; and finally the worst of all, true believers, who think that gay bathhouses are to be celebrated, and hate the idea of gay marriage. Fortunately, gay culture doesn't really maintain itself well, because it's not inheritable, so gay culture won't be taught to LGBT children, so this would normalize. But LGBT
activists hate this, hence drag queen story hour, etc, and try to teach this to children (in an ultimately futile way). It will die anyway, as public schools are shit at everything, but it will take a lot longer.